|
|||||||
| Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
|
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Cotswolds, England
Posts: 74
|
Hello chaps,
Searching for some information detail here. The 1932 chassis frame rails had the well known swage line and the central K-member. What changes were made for the 1933 model? Swage line? K-member? Anything else? A diagram of the 1933 chassis frame would be great. Hoping ... Neil. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Huntsville Al
Posts: 1,553
|
Just a few I know of, the 33 had no swage line, had a longer wheelbase and had an X inner frame instead of a K member.
You can go to Wescott's web page and see a blue print diagram of both frames.http://www.wescottsauto.com/
__________________
Matt 24:36-41 |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 11,650
|
American Ford or British Ford?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: southeastern Michigan
Posts: 10,670
|
Excluding the powertrain, except for the brake drums, backing plates, and some other brake system and suspension parts, and there are no carryover '32 chassis parts employed in a '33 chassis. This assumes your question pertains to the 112" wheelbase '33 chassis and not the 106" wheelbase '33 Model 14 chassis.
Last edited by DavidG; 03-14-2018 at 08:53 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Cotswolds, England
Posts: 74
|
Got it.
Thank you.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: N.W.England
Posts: 439
|
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
Here you go Neil....all you need. |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
| Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
|