|
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
![]() |
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#26 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Hazzard County
Posts: 1,919
|
![]() Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
Quote:
Valid point. By the way, a few years ago, I posted a portion of a video I shot while riding in Marco's roadster. That car is unreal. My tudor sedan is restored with nothing but N.O.S. parts, and it's pretty close to the driving experience but still not quite. It just doesn't "feel" the same as the original car. You're right about the engine internals. I wish it didn't have to get repainted, but the restorer did it thinking he was helping me. Same thing happened to the radiator when I had the radiator shop boil and rod it out. They repainted it. Now you have to look closely to see that it's original. I know opinions run all across the board, but I am still curious to see what middle ground looks like. My opinion is that tires, belts, hoses, etc. can be replaced and a 91 year old car is still original. Where do you draw the line? For me it is a repaint, motor swap, interior material swap or similar. But, I asked because I am trying to learn, not to share my opinions. Thanks for the kind words. I will never know everything about Model A's, but I am enjoying the journey trying to learn as much as possible. It feeds my Asperger's Syndrome. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|