|
|||||||
| Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
|
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 554
|
can anyone explain why an 80# oil sender would not work in all flatheads and what the diff is between the 80 and 50 in practical terms? i have interchanged these over the years with no issues and haven't spent much time thinking about it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Kokomo, Indiana
Posts: 1,731
|
I strongly suspect the different "senders" have different electrical resistance. The sender regulates the current seen by the oil pressure guage. The resistance of the sender would have to be matched to the gauge to get an accurate reading. If I'm wrong, hopefully someone will correct this post - and earn my thanks at the same time.
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 554
|
i contacted a supplier that said they sell 80# senders for all 35-53 flatheads but i am still unsure.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Rockwall TX
Posts: 6,018
|
35-41 use a 50# sender which is difficult to find.I had an 80# sender in my 35 and it did not read correctly.When I found the 50# and changed it ,all was good.I suppose the guage and sender should be compatible.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 7,634
|
The 80# will work, but calibration will be wrong. I'm not sure which, but you'll get either .625 x or 1.6 x the correct reading.
There were two identifying features for a 50# sender, either it was marked 50, or had no mark at all. All 80# senders are so marked.
__________________
Alan |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
BANNED
Join Date: May 2010
Location: stratford,ct
Posts: 5,971
|
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 554
|
i have 2 of these senders left and neither are marked. one came out of my 53 merc motor and one was on my 40 ford motor and they look identical and neither have any marking except for a very small circled number or symbol that looks like a 2.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 7,634
|
Original '35 - '41 senders were not marked. When the 80# senders came in, there was the need to identify the difference, so from that point forward, all senders were marked, at least while the 50's were still being supplied.
F1builder has now thrown a monkey wrench into the discussion, so maybe someone can pick it up from here?
__________________
Alan |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 5,394
|
I agree with ford38v8 that from my experance the early 50# was not marked. I have not seen a 80# unmarked. I also believe the 50# sender was marked upon the introduction of the 80#. It is possible the unmarked sender out of a 53 Merc is a 50# and installed inproperly to give a higher oil pressure reading on the gauge.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: ManchVegas, New Hampshah
Posts: 1,591
|
I agree you need to match the sender scale with the gauge scale. A 50# sender must be used with a 50# gauge and the same with the 80#s. However, I did find that a sender for a 302 in a 1980 F100 does work accurately with the stock 50# guage in my pickup. The sender I was sold for the application is a Standard Motor Products partno PS-60. 3 years ago it cost $25.00, available locally and was made in the USA.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Tucson Arizona
Posts: 301
|
Different senders have different ohms ranges, that is true. Senders must match the gauge. Henry / Kokomo is right on this.
__________________
Building a 29 Sedan on 32 chassis........ very slowly....
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Columbia, SC
Posts: 1,579
|
Possibly "KS," the trademark of King-Seeley who made these units?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 18,006
|
No telling how many "aftermarket" senders were made or whether they were all marked with the psi rating. If they were made by King Seeley they generally always have the trade mark KS in a circle stamped on there.
Kerby |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Windham, CT
Posts: 703
|
Quote:
__________________
[FONT=Comic Sans MS] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Near Rising Sun, Maryland
Posts: 10,876
|
There is a commercially available sending unit that can replace the original 50# sender and works correctly with a 50# gauge. I believe it is/was used on a Jeep/AMC product. I have this info saved in my computer files which I do not have access to at the moment but could post later if anyone is interested.
__________________
John "Never give up on what you really want to do. The person with big dreams is more powerful than one with all the facts". Albert Einstein |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Central Illinois
Posts: 372
|
John,
Please post the Jeep/AMC part number for the oil pressure sending unit. Thanks!
__________________
I've got the old car disease. Thankfully there's no cure! |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Gerrardstown, WV
Posts: 2,303
|
I got one from Kaiser Willys Auto Supply for my '40 pickup, but I have no part #. $36.74
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: ManchVegas, New Hampshah
Posts: 1,591
|
BrianCT,
Yes the system was converted to 12v neg ground, I am running the stock gauges using a 6v Runtz reducer on each. The gauge and sender will operate the same way on either polarity as long as only 6v is applied. |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
BANNED
Join Date: May 2010
Location: stratford,ct
Posts: 5,971
|
Ive looked up the jeep unit in the past,it obviously works but not quite a duplicate of the original. Its taller i remember so would not look right if going for points for those of you who care about that stuff.Probebly a point deduction on it. For me i wouldn't care a hoot. ken ct. This was a good thread,maybe we all learned something.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: ManchVegas, New Hampshah
Posts: 1,591
|
F1builder,
Here is an attempt to answer your original question. From what I've observed by exploring a number of the Ford indicator systems is the gauge units are basically the same. Meaning it takes the same electrical energy to move the pointer from 0 to full scale. The pointer is moved by putting current through a heater wire wrapped around a bi-mettalic arm. More current equals more pointer deflection. The original senders use a similar heater wire bi-metallic strip. The strip is attached to a set of points. One side of these points is tied to the sensor element. In the case of the OP it is a diaphram. The diaphram actually establishes the range for the sensor. So if a 80# sensor is used with the 50# gauge when the sensor sees 50# the guage will show about 30#. Inversely a 50# sensor seeing 50# will show 80# on an 80# gauge. Sorry this got a little long. |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
| Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
|