The Ford Barn

JM 35 Sedan · 07-05-2014, 06:27 AM

Sorry....but with all the previous posts on the mechanical and electrical issues with this test vehicle and some of the "fixes" that were made, plus the previous negitive posts that were made by this same person about Skip Haney's and Bob Shewman's products, I would not rely 100% on these test results. Of course this is just my opinion

JWL · 07-05-2014, 06:53 AM

Well, as they say in the movie "Used Cars"---this "blows the hell out of those high prices".

V8COOPMAN · 07-05-2014, 08:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JM 35 Sedan

Sorry....but with all the previous posts on the mechanical issues with this test vehicle and some of the "fixes" that were made, plus the previous negitive posts that were made by this same person about Skip Haney's and Bob Shewman's products, I would not rely 100% on these test results.

Thank you, thank you, thank you!

Could not have said it any better. DD

Old Henry · 07-05-2014, 09:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JM 35 Sedan

Sorry....but with all the previous posts on the mechanical issues with this test vehicle and some of the "fixes" that were made, plus the previous negitive posts that were made by this same person about Skip Haney's and Bob Shewman's products, I would not rely 100% on these test results.

. . . not to mention the very few actual miles the person drives his vehicle.

It's pretty easy to criticize without any contradictory data or even personal experience. Not very persuasive though.

If you don't have any way to refute the message all you're left with is to kill the messenger.

It doesn't take a rocket scientist to do exactly the same thing twice, changing only one thing, record the data and report it. Interpretation of the data may vary but the data itself are facts that can't be disputed.

Old Henry · 07-05-2014, 10:02 AM

Thanks to VeryTangled for graphing the test results for us. I added his graph of the elevations he made for the identical test last year and the numbers were re-aligned by 51 MERC-CT to read a little easier.

07-05-2014, 06:27 AM	#1
JM 35 Sedan Senior Member Join Date: May 2010 Location: Near Rising Sun, Maryland Posts: 10,876	Re: Road Test of Stant vs. Shewman Thermostats Sorry....but with all the previous posts on the mechanical and electrical issues with this test vehicle and some of the "fixes" that were made, plus the previous negitive posts that were made by this same person about Skip Haney's and Bob Shewman's products, I would not rely 100% on these test results. Of course this is just my opinion __________________ *John* *"Never give up on what you really want to do. The person with big dreams is more powerful than one with all the facts". Albert Einstein* Last edited by JM 35 Sedan; 07-06-2014 at 11:16 PM.

07-05-2014, 06:53 AM	#2
JWL Member Emeritus Join Date: May 2010 Location: Fitzgerald, Georgia Posts: 2,204	Re: Road Test of Stant vs. Shewman Thermostats Well, as they say in the movie "Used Cars"---this "blows the hell out of those high prices".

07-05-2014, 10:02 AM	#5
Old Henry Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2010 Location: Orem, Utah Posts: 5,762	Re: Road Test of Stant vs. Shewman Thermostats Thanks to VeryTangled for graphing the test results for us. I added his graph of the elevations he made for the identical test last year and the numbers were re-aligned by 51 MERC-CT to read a little easier. __________________ Prof. Henry (The Roaming Gnome) "It is good to have an end to journey toward; but it is the journey that matters, in the end.” Ursula K. Le Guin in The Left Hand of Darkness Last edited by Old Henry; 07-06-2014 at 10:35 PM.*