|
|||||||
| Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
|
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2022
Posts: 577
|
I just read it is possible to use a 1.72 intake valves and 1.6 exhaust.
I thought 1.6 on both was max. My 41 Merc blick is rather ported but Ill seen bigger and its still has the 1.5 valves. I cant see on my block how a ring that wide can has a material under in the runner ? Here is a picture on 1.72-1.60. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Masterton, New Zealand
Posts: 4,097
|
You need to use a block that does not have valve seat inserts fitted
__________________
Unfortunately, two half wits don't make a whole wit! |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NJ
Posts: 7,226
|
I thought 1.6" fit with the stock seats after a modern valve job. Is that not correct?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Charlotte NC KiWi-L100 available here
Posts: 3,415
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Charlotte NC KiWi-L100 available here
Posts: 3,415
|
I have owned this one block for 35 years out of an only Bonneville car ported to the max 3.375 x 4.250. It has 1.775 intakes and 1.675 exhaust. The valves an almost touching each other.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2022
Posts: 577
|
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
I think I might stay at the 1.5” as it might be issues. Just checking. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Charlotte NC KiWi-L100 available here
Posts: 3,415
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2022
Posts: 577
|
So bring it up to 1.6 from 1.5 on intake might be a idea.
So are you replacing the std rings doing so ? Its 0.05” radially open up. I has little hard to beleive its worth it as this ports is not ideal. I guess the port work is more important than inlet area on valve. But I cant tell as no experiance. All I know my bock is really way bigger than std. What get me worry is 1 cylinder has a crack welded up, its really nice done and comes from the exhaust port ( classic crack place ) I heard a Bonneville no blower not bored over or stroked and both at 1.6” really pirted up and tri-Y headers and .520” roller cam made 400 HP at sealeval. Sounds tuff but car was fast. If I go over and get my carbs to Uncle Max I hope visit him talk FH. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Germany
Posts: 255
|
There is a lot more to good breathing Flathead then just big valves….
A roller cam with high lift and very good ports are needed. Then small displacement and the engine will make power at 6k rpm , nothing below 3k and Idle at 1500 rpm . Sound like the perfect street engine….. :-) |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NJ
Posts: 7,226
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Germany
Posts: 255
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: East Coast in CT
Posts: 1,778
|
Hank wrote
I heard a Bonneville no blower not bored over or stroked and both at 1.6 really pirted up and tri-Y headers and .520 roller cam made 400 HP at sealeval. Sounds tuff but car was fast. Ron says There's no way that kind of power can be made with a normally aspirated stock block Ford flathead burning gasoline using 1.6 valves. If it was true where's the results in the form of a time slip? Ronnieroadster
__________________
I use the F word a lot no not that word these words Flathead, Focus and Finish "Life Member of the Bonneville 200 MPH Club using a Ford Flathead block First Ford Flathead bodied roadster to run 200 MPH Record July 13, 2018 LTA timing association 200.921 First Ford flathead roadster to run 200 MPH at Bonneville Salt Flats setting the record August 7th 2021 at 205.744 MPH reset the record in 2024 to 211.830 running to mile four. Top speed 2024 mile five 220.672 exit speed 221.587 |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2022
Posts: 577
|
Yes it sounds incredible ( my bad notes mentioned it )
I never been a dyno dude, but spend time there most doing nothing on ET ( in my stockers ) Then jetting will nver be there anyway and headers can't realy either be told and then its the dyno settings, dyno room, air inlet etc etc. This is 'just' numbers ( for me ) Don't take this to serious, but the car ( Merc 49 ) was anyway going over 150 MPH 30 years ago at the salt and transmission and rearend eat allot of that HP. |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: ohio
Posts: 1,165
|
I've got some ocean front property in Arizona .......
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2022
Posts: 577
|
Everyone ever used a dyno know a dyno is a dyno.
Scoreboard to tell. |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: South Texas
Posts: 2,135
|
I suspect the car that 3W Hank is referring to is Kenny Kloth's Mercury sedan that raced at Bonneville in 1991, you can see the car at the 30:23 mark in this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zFIF7bQuv_s
Everything I have ever read about the car is it just cracked 140, and was running a very breathed on 267 cubic inch flathead. It was much more modified than the statement above would indicate. The engine was discussed a bit in this thread and was estimated to make 220 to 240 horsepower, which would still be an impressive feat for a naturally aspirated flathead. Last edited by 38 coupe; 09-26-2025 at 09:19 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2022
Posts: 577
|
38 coupe, that's correct.
Out of topics but fun. I has not seen the timeslip but record might be 140 but I think he went over 150, but whatever 150 or not, 400 HP or not this guy I take out my hat for. A very clever guy installed a 55 mm fatcam for big profile and made own roller lifters and over .500" in lift, thin rings and milled and tested own chambers and this is 80's or early 90's. He was over 6.000 RPM and this was not bored or stroked. This is a very heavy car and aerodynamics is not really there and take that to over 7.000 foot and over 100 F and bring on not HP friendly transmission and rearend and 'say' it went +150 ( as I heard ) it can be calqulated what HP it need. As I said I'm not a dyno guy and I know a Swede that builded a Chevy BB low compression street motor in a Master Challange category ( he won ) many years ago, but he died in cancer after that and he always said a dyno is just get a number in apples or pears nothing more. I agree. But back to a FH capable doing that speed one can calqulate HP, even at 'only' 140 MPH, I'm impressed and HP must be over 200 but not maybe 400 even in a dream dyno. Last edited by 3W Hank; 09-27-2025 at 03:53 PM. |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
| Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
|