|
|||||||
| Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
|
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#21 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 663
|
Some quick photos of the above!
JB |
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 11,643
|
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2018
Posts: 482
|
I bought a set of Cometics for a project. They are super expensive but worth the long wait and $$$.
I ended up changing heads though. |
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 663
|
I hear you on cost, but it’s really not bad. I was going to have to buy 4 new gaskets anyway as I wouldn’t trust reusing these with all the fitting.
The driver side ended up being the same with my smallest quench gap being 0.068, so 0.092 for both sides. JB |
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Orcas Island Washington
Posts: 6,202
|
All in all, looks like you came up with a good solution. We are fortunate that there is a company making gaskets of this nature for an engine family that is coming up on a hundred years old.
__________________
Owner/Operator of 'Jailbar Ranch' on the side of Mt. Pickett. Current stable consists of 1946 1/2 ton pickup turned woodie wagon with FH V8, 1946 Tonner Pickup with 226 H six, 1979 Toyota landcruiser wagon, now wearing 1947 Ford Jailbar sheet metal. 'Rusty ol' floorboards, hot on their feet' (Alan Jackson) |
|
|
|
|
|
#26 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 11,643
|
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#27 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 1,908
|
if you have used merk pistons there is no reason the pistons are above the block as they say something is wrong in demark
|
|
|
|
|
|
#28 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 663
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#29 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Orcas Island Washington
Posts: 6,202
|
All those tin foil balls brings back the angst I was feeling when doing the same thing 18 months ago. I had to carve into the heads and carve some more, The machinist had told me he decked the block just a bit because of a flaw. While it wasn't really apparant to me, others here with more experience pointed out that the pistonns were indeed protruding, 'pop ups' they said.. I perservered and got a quench area that satisfied my online coaches. Fact is I could not possibly be happier with the power this thing has. For me it's actually more about the torque/hill pulling ability. You will be amazed what the extra bore and stroke particularly if you are installing it into the same vehicle like I did. In other words you will be rewarded greatly for the time and money spent on this engine.
__________________
Owner/Operator of 'Jailbar Ranch' on the side of Mt. Pickett. Current stable consists of 1946 1/2 ton pickup turned woodie wagon with FH V8, 1946 Tonner Pickup with 226 H six, 1979 Toyota landcruiser wagon, now wearing 1947 Ford Jailbar sheet metal. 'Rusty ol' floorboards, hot on their feet' (Alan Jackson) |
|
|
|
|
|
#30 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Minnesota, Florida Keys
Posts: 12,132
|
I have gone through this entire thread, and I see a couple places where the O/P says he has Mercury pistons. I don't see which crank he is using, but it has to be a Mercury crank to have this kind of problems. Since Merc pistons have the pins located 1/8" higher to make up for the increased 1/4" stroke, they would be 1/8" low in the bores at TDC with a Ford crank.
Could the O/P definitively identify which crank and pistons he has? |
|
|
|
|
|
#31 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Marana, AZ.
Posts: 482
|
@tubman He's got a thread on the FTE forum as well for this build. Said he has a 4" Merc crank, ground 10/10, .040 over bore on the block with Egge L991 mercury pistons and an EAB cam.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#32 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Minnesota, Florida Keys
Posts: 12,132
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#33 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 663
|
4” mercury crank, egge mercury pistons, EAB heads
JB |
|
|
|
|
|
#34 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Minnesota, Florida Keys
Posts: 12,132
|
I'll go on record by saying this should be approached with head work rather than double or fancy, expensive thick gaskets.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#35 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 663
|
Quote:
The cometic gaskets were ordered today. JB |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#36 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Minnesota, Florida Keys
Posts: 12,132
|
I've seen a bunch of cut up blocks so folks could measure cylinder wall thickness and port wall thickness. Surely someone has cut up a few heads. You've got the gaskets coming, so that's done. I would have cut up a junk head to see exactly where I was. I just don't like the idea of a thin deck and a non-standard gasket.
I'm sure it will work; good luck with your project.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#37 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Minnesota, Florida Keys
Posts: 12,132
|
Sorry for getting all involved in this, but I am having some serious problems with what's going on here. The first thing I have to ask myself, is how did this problem (the piston being at least .040" proud of the cylinder) come about? There are only two ways I can think of that can cause this. The first is there's something funny going on with the crankshaft, rods and pistons. I would think this would be highly unlikely, which leaves my second choice, that the block has been decked excessively. Since no flathead ever left the factory with an ideal .050" quench, the decking must have been .060"-.080". Given the notorious thinness of flathead decks, I would be very wary of this block.
If any of you can come up with a flaw in my logic, I'd like to hear it so we can put the O/P's mind at ease. The way things stand now, I believe it is imperative to find out what the actual cause of this situation is and not just throw a "band-aid" (yes, that's what it is) of non-standard thick gaskets at it. I'd at least want to sonic check the deck to find the actual thickness. This sounds like it's a high class, high buck build that deserves to done right, not finished with a patch. If someone else can tell me what's causing this, lets hear it. If this were my engine and my money, I know I'd sure like to be sure I know exactly what's going on. |
|
|
|
|
|
#38 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: South Texas
Posts: 2,135
|
For different reasons I asked the group here about head thickness and doming to fit. The findings from some very helpful members was there should be enough thickness above the piston. The thread is here: https://fordbarn.com/forum/showthread.php?t=325380
|
|
|
|
|
|
#39 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Solihull, England.
Posts: 9,239
|
If the engine will not run without oversize head gaskets there must be something wrong. I'd be more inclined to see where the error is. Once the anomaly is identified, Then a decision can be made whether to correct it or to live with it and compensate with the thicker gaskets. The things that could be wrong are crank stroke, rod length, Pistons with incorrect height above the pin, pistons with incorrect dome shape, block deck height and head being skimmed or incorrectly cast. There may be other things but that is enough to be going on with.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#40 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: Kansas
Posts: 1,229
|
Quote:
The EAB heads are .260"-.275" thick in the dome area. I cut mine .040" with no ill effects and have driven it another 15K miles since.
__________________
"It don't take but country smarts to solve the problem" (Smokey Yunick) '30 Model A Speedster '41 Merc Town Sedan / 260" 8CM engine '66 Fairlane four door / "warmed up" 302
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
| Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
|