|
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Administrator
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 681
|
![]()
So there's a lot of drama here... you gotta YouTuber saying he had a bad experience and a manufacturer saying his experience wasn't honest. And they argue every time the subject comes up.
I am not interested in hosting that argument. So feel free to post your own experience, but lets leave that other crap in the past. Thanks fellas. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Reseda, Calif.
Posts: 2,191
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
![]() |
#3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Harpers Ferry, WV
Posts: 109
|
![]()
Just wanted to chime in. I had a Burtz engine installed in my 30 Town Sedan a few months ago. I also had the touring cam, lighter flywheel, and the high compression head installed. The engine has performed flawlessly. It has a very healthy power increase over the original engine, but still has that classic Model A engine look and sound. The other thing I notice is the lack of vibration in the steering wheel. I also have a 30 Coupe, and the rebuilt original engine in that car has about 32K miles on it. The vibration in the steering wheel of the Coupe is at times hand numbing. I also notice that the Burtz engine will drop down to an idle quite fast when you step on the clutch, I guess due to the lighter flywheel. Overall I think the Burtz engine has all of the advantages of the original Model A engine (the look and the sound), but with the added benefits of a modern undated engine. I'd definitely give it a five star rating out of five.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Southern California
Posts: 7,302
|
![]() Quote:
Charlie Stephens |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|