|
|||||||
| Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
|
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#21 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Masterton, New Zealand
Posts: 4,096
|
Thank you!!
__________________
Unfortunately, two half wits don't make a whole wit! |
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2023
Posts: 10
|
The wheel cylinder appears to be a 1936-1946 Chevrolet (Huck Hydraulic Brakes).
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 2,272
|
>>>Hydraulic brakes already "float".>>>
Bendix yes. Lockheed no. Still hoping for a FlatHeadTed floater conversion kit for Lockheeds. |
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Masterton, New Zealand
Posts: 4,096
|
The way I see of improving your 'modified' 34 brakes is you could replace the original Ford wedge setup with Teds floater kit to the bottom,; this would allow the shoes to 'float', and you'd need to somehow make a fixed anchor above the wheel cylinder to prevent the trailing shoe from moving. Make sense? Alternative to using Teds floater kit, would be to drill out the rivets holding the adjuster mechanism, slot the backing plate holes, and reassemble with bolts and locknuts, to allow the mechanism to float. Teds kit would be preferable.
__________________
Unfortunately, two half wits don't make a whole wit! |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
| Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
|