|
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2020
Location: northern Maryland
Posts: 73
|
![]()
Electronic fuel injection is complicated. Therefore, case studies are needed to get past the assorted hurdles, physical and psychological. Car magazines have been supplying such stories for quite a few years for hot rod engines. Hopefully, some interested people can supply useful references for us 4-banger fans. Naysayers (aka traditionalists) will tell us their feelings loudly, but I think this thread is long overdue and now quite valid given Terry Burtz's engine foundation and its many adopters. My Burtz engine loves to rev with its modest 6:1 Snyder's head, dual #81 Strombergs, tubular exhaust header, and Honda distributor. As Steve Serr and others can attest from dyno testing, getting air/fuel ratios consistent across cylinders and engine operating conditions is challenging with carbs. Maybe it would be easier with electronic fuel injection.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2022
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,152
|
![]() The new ones are pretty idiot proof. An air/fuel sensor in the exhaust is about all that is needed for the brain to tune itself. There are hose clamp type connectors for the 02 sensor - so no welding. The return line does not have to go back to the tank - only to the low side of the fuel pump. We put one together with a T at the inlet to the pump for the return. I don't see why it wouldn't work as an updraft - there is no float bowl. https://www.holley.com/products/fuel.../parts/550-552
|
![]() |
![]() |
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
![]() |
|
|
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|