|
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Florida
Posts: 611
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NJ
Posts: 6,915
|
![]() Quote:
In stock form, ZZ4's put out 350 h.p and 400 ft lbs of torque. Hard to walk away from that, even with a 300+c.i. normally asperated flathead. Same trams, same rear, I think that story is an urban legend. Last edited by Tim Ayers; 06-27-2016 at 07:29 AM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
![]() |
#3 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Florida
Posts: 611
|
![]() Quote:
Thinking about it another way, the stock 221" Flatty in my '41 runs darn good for what it is. I doubt a 221" OHV V8 would put all that much daylight between us if the theoretical 221" OHV were similarly equipped induction wise. "Flatheads don't breathe" is the mantra you hear. Maybe at stop light to stop light speeds the L head engine doesn't give up all that much in breathing and make up for it with better fuel mixing and combustion efficiency. Not to mention the 4 3/8" stroke in the belly of that Flatty. That's a dimension that a small block Chevy could never swallow. Just sayin'. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|