|
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Eastern Tennessee
Posts: 11,971
|
![]() Quote:
Personally I don't feel Carini's car was ever an "award-winning" vehicle but maybe during that era it was. In the 60's, probably $3,500.00+/-. I'm kinda basing that off of my Dad purchasing a restored Deluxe Roadster in 1963 for $2,500. Just remember that back then (-much like today) not everyone viewed a A400 as a car they wanted to own. Yes, they were considered rare, but the popularity is kinda hit or miss on those cars. For my personal taste, I think they look nice with the top up, however they look odd with the top down. Many share my sentiments, ...and if the top is never going to be let down, a Victoria Coupe is seemingly just as desirable. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 2,973
|
![]()
I didn't mean to be ----mean
![]() I too think an A-400 w/ the top down 'ain't' all that attractive. They look 'weird'. A Victoria 'looks' neater if you want that style of A. Again, that's just my opinion. Roadsters look better with the top up. They still look good with the top 'down' but better with it up. Same as 60's convertibles.GM, Ford, Mopar makes no difference. Joop's car was ten times more attractive than the Carini car in my eye. You could tell by Wayne's knee jerk reaction to his father's old car that he felt the same way. |
![]() |
![]() |
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|