The Ford Barn

Steve Plucker · 07-23-2013, 11:38 AM

Since Area 23 (Shocks and Shackels) has not yet been revised, but hopefully will be soon, I need to know just which style of shock arms I need for my February/March 1929 Tudor Sedan...IF IN FACT THE DATES HAVE CHANGED.

Would I need the ones that have the "flat" surface OR do I need the ones with the "raised" ring around that area where the arm attaches to the shock itself?...AGAIN, IF IN FACT THE DATES HAVE CHANGED!

According to the current 1997 Standards (that was 16 years ago by the way), I need the one with the "ring" to be correct.

Thanks.

Pluck

Steve Plucker · 07-23-2013, 09:43 PM

Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm...No takers?

Pluck

Steve Plucker · 07-23-2013, 10:46 PM

Got it...Thanks.

Pluck

Tudortomnz · 07-24-2013, 01:38 AM

Are you referring to the extra metal/boss where the adjustment nut is?
I do not know about ''J.S'', but it is mentioned as a new feature during August in US production & in December in the Canadian S.B.'s.
My car had its original untouched shocks on in '69 & one side has the boss, the other is flat. It was produced at Ontario late Oct./early Nov.

Steve Plucker · 07-24-2013, 08:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tudortomnz

Are you referring to the extra metal/boss where the adjustment nut is?
I do not know about ''J.S'', but it is mentioned as a new feature during August in US production & in December in the Canadian S.B.'s.
My car had its original untouched shocks on in '69 & one side has the boss, the other is flat. It was produced at Ontario late Oct./early Nov.

Yes, but have been informed I need the flat surfaced ones for which I have except for one rear arm without numbers

Pluck

Brentwood Bob · 07-24-2013, 01:22 PM

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)

Pm sent. Bob

07-23-2013, 11:38 AM	#1
Steve Plucker BANNED Join Date: May 2010 Location: Walla Walla, Washington USA Posts: 6,066	Shock arms... Since Area 23 (Shocks and Shackels) has not yet been revised, but hopefully will be soon, I need to know just which style of shock arms I need for my February/March 1929 Tudor Sedan...IF IN FACT THE DATES HAVE CHANGED. Would I need the ones that have the "flat" surface OR do I need the ones with the "raised" ring around that area where the arm attaches to the shock itself?...AGAIN, IF IN FACT THE DATES HAVE CHANGED! According to the current 1997 Standards (that was 16 years ago by the way), I need the one with the "ring" to be correct. Thanks. Pluck Last edited by Steve Plucker; 07-23-2013 at 11:51 AM.

07-23-2013, 09:43 PM	#2
Steve Plucker BANNED Join Date: May 2010 Location: Walla Walla, Washington USA Posts: 6,066	Re: Shock arms... Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm...No takers? Pluck

07-23-2013, 10:46 PM	#3
Steve Plucker BANNED Join Date: May 2010 Location: Walla Walla, Washington USA Posts: 6,066	Re: Shock arms... Got it...Thanks. Pluck

07-24-2013, 01:38 AM	#4
Tudortomnz Senior Member Join Date: May 2010 Location: Canterbury, New Zealand Posts: 1,242	Re: Shock arms... Are you referring to the extra metal/boss where the adjustment nut is? I do not know about ''J.S'', but it is mentioned as a new feature during August in US production & in December in the Canadian S.B.'s. My car had its original untouched shocks on in '69 & one side has the boss, the other is flat. It was produced at Ontario late Oct./early Nov.

07-24-2013, 01:22 PM	#6
Brentwood Bob Senior Member Join Date: May 2010 Location: brentwood, ca Posts: 4,420	Re: Shock arms... Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) Pm sent. Bob