32 rearends

[alchemy]

Hank, I know you love rabbit holes. Have you considered Roto-flo shocks?

[3W Hank]

Yes rabbit holes is great for learn.
This cars can be built in many ways so I like look into them, and if one rabbit hole not fit my ideas I can leave but good deal is one has learn something.
The friction shock you show is what came up on how McGee did it and new ones is now made.
Not a bad idea on a 32/34 axle but ’modern’ shocks is better.

Great to see Bored&Stroked design in front of axle..

[s.e.charles]

Originally Posted by alchemy

. . . I know you love rabbit holes. . . .

the very foundation of the internet, those 'holes.

if we couldn't know too much, we'd no nothing at all (sic).

[hueyhoolihan]

the title reminds me an old highlight reel made at Hef's Playboy mansion.

[3W Hank]

A friend of my showed me his, I don’t know if behind or in front of the rear axle.

[petehoovie]

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)

Originally Posted by 3W Hank

A friend of my showed me his, I don’t know if behind or in front of the rear axle.

[hotcoupe]

Hank, your friend does nice work.
Tom

[alchemy]

Mine looks similar to those, but not as artsy. The top mounting required bending the lip on the crossmember up flat for clearance. The angle of my shocks is probably a little flatter than optimal, because my sedan is lowered and I don’t have room to take them up higher.

[Bored&Stroked]

Originally Posted by 3W Hank

A friend of my showed me his, I don’t know if behind or in front of the rear axle.

That setup would put the shock behind the axle . . . which is where all the troubles lie! LOL

[alchemy]

Mine fits. I even use the shocks with covers. Mine were from Chassis Engineering a couple decades ago, and I think they were a part number that was supposed originally from a Vette. But I don’t know what year.