|
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Oakland County, Michigan
Posts: 562
|
![]()
Guys,
I've got a couple questions about carbs and cranks, parts at opposite ends of the engine. I did a couple quick searchs but it didn't seem to turn very much up. First, what's more desirable to run on an almost-stock flathead, a Stromberg 48 or 97? I just picked up what looks to be a pretty nice 48 for SUPER cheap. My engine's about 251 cubic inches and has a factory cam. It runs well on a stock 97, but would it benefit from the *slightly* better flow of a 48? As for crankshafts, what do you veteran engine builders here on the Ford Barn prefer, earlier cranks with full-floating rod bearings or later-style ones with individual inserts? I just picked up a rusty 8BA for relatively little and was curious which rotating assembly was preferred. Thanks as always, - Craig |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member Emeritus
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Wichita KS
Posts: 16,132
|
![]()
Insert bearings on the crank question.
|
![]() |
![]() |
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
![]() |
#3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Masterton, New Zealand
Posts: 3,998
|
![]()
Whereas...I prefer floaters!
__________________
Unfortunately, two half wits don't make a whole wit! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Oakland County, Michigan
Posts: 562
|
![]()
And now the plot thickens ...
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: oroville calif
Posts: 892
|
![]()
I use inserts, why did ford quit using the floaters and go to inserts, any one know
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Chester Vt
Posts: 8,985
|
![]() Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 2,706
|
![]()
Carb; You probably wont tell the difference with the 48, but give it a try..
__________________
"Came too close to dying to stop living now!" |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 362
|
![]()
I would go with a 94 carb as they work better than than a single 97 or 48. I like the floating bearings, but because they are hard to find in some sizes and a lot of machine shops do not know how to properly resize the rods if they are worn, so if I were building a new engine, I would use the insert bearings.
__________________
TomO |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Member Emeritus
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Fitzgerald, Georgia
Posts: 2,204
|
![]()
For my personal use I prefer FF bearings. However, I recommend the "do-it-yourself" people use inserts.
Someone previously mentioned there is little measurable difference between the 48 and 97. That is true. It is also true, as mentioned above, the Holley 94 does a better job of atomizing and might hold a slight advantage in some situations. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Oakland County, Michigan
Posts: 562
|
![]()
For those of you that favor full-floating bearings, what are the advantages? What is required to set them up properly?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Iowa
Posts: 1,634
|
![]()
An advantage to floaters is they don't require changing of rods to accommodate the inserts. If the original rods have acceptable condition, and the crank is OK, it will cost less than swapping cranks, etc. Your "rusty" 8BA may not be suitable unless it checks out. As to the carb question, if the car is running well with the 97, why change? Swapping carbs seldom produces much, if any, advantage. If the 97 becomes troublesome, I'd go to the 94.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|