The Ford Barn

The Ford Barn (https://www.fordbarn.com/forum/index.php)
-   Early V8 (1932-53) (https://www.fordbarn.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=4)
-   -   Carb and Crank Questions (https://www.fordbarn.com/forum/showthread.php?t=151275)

Admiral 10-05-2014 07:04 PM

Carb and Crank Questions
 

Guys,

I've got a couple questions about carbs and cranks, parts at opposite ends of the engine. I did a couple quick searchs but it didn't seem to turn very much up. First, what's more desirable to run on an almost-stock flathead, a Stromberg 48 or 97? I just picked up what looks to be a pretty nice 48 for SUPER cheap. My engine's about 251 cubic inches and has a factory cam. It runs well on a stock 97, but would it benefit from the *slightly* better flow of a 48?

As for crankshafts, what do you veteran engine builders here on the Ford Barn prefer, earlier cranks with full-floating rod bearings or later-style ones with individual inserts? I just picked up a rusty 8BA for relatively little and was curious which rotating assembly was preferred.


Thanks as always,

- Craig

JSeery 10-05-2014 07:50 PM

Re: Carb and Crank Questions
 

Insert bearings on the crank question.

Brian 10-05-2014 08:50 PM

Re: Carb and Crank Questions
 

Whereas...I prefer floaters!

Admiral 10-05-2014 09:07 PM

Re: Carb and Crank Questions
 

And now the plot thickens ... :). That's one for inserts and another for floaters.

WestCoast 10-05-2014 09:18 PM

Re: Carb and Crank Questions
 

I use inserts, why did ford quit using the floaters and go to inserts, any one know

Ol' Ron 10-05-2014 09:55 PM

Re: Carb and Crank Questions
 

I think the application would determine the need for floating bearings,however. being Old school I really like them. Unfortunately they were very expensive to make and install at the factury. When Macnamars and his gang of bean counters took over ford in the late forties, they left along with studs and a decent distributor, among other things.rother things

Talkwrench 10-05-2014 11:19 PM

Re: Carb and Crank Questions
 

Carb; You probably wont tell the difference with the 48, but give it a try..

TomO 10-06-2014 09:33 AM

Re: Carb and Crank Questions
 

I would go with a 94 carb as they work better than than a single 97 or 48. I like the floating bearings, but because they are hard to find in some sizes and a lot of machine shops do not know how to properly resize the rods if they are worn, so if I were building a new engine, I would use the insert bearings.

JWL 10-06-2014 10:41 AM

Re: Carb and Crank Questions
 

For my personal use I prefer FF bearings. However, I recommend the "do-it-yourself" people use inserts.

Someone previously mentioned there is little measurable difference between the 48 and 97. That is true. It is also true, as mentioned above, the Holley 94 does a better job of atomizing and might hold a slight advantage in some situations.

Admiral 10-06-2014 12:33 PM

Re: Carb and Crank Questions
 

For those of you that favor full-floating bearings, what are the advantages? What is required to set them up properly?

supereal 10-06-2014 12:53 PM

Re: Carb and Crank Questions
 

An advantage to floaters is they don't require changing of rods to accommodate the inserts. If the original rods have acceptable condition, and the crank is OK, it will cost less than swapping cranks, etc. Your "rusty" 8BA may not be suitable unless it checks out. As to the carb question, if the car is running well with the 97, why change? Swapping carbs seldom produces much, if any, advantage. If the 97 becomes troublesome, I'd go to the 94.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:33 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.