Go Back   The Ford Barn > General Discussion > Model A (1928-31)

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-08-2013, 06:58 AM   #1
Mitch//pa
BANNED
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Bucks County, PA
Posts: 11,454
Default tudor top material

according to the judging standards acceptable top material for the 28-31 tudor is either long or short grain. what do you guys prefer and why..
Mitch//pa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2013, 07:14 AM   #2
Tom Wesenberg
Senior Member
 
Tom Wesenberg's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Mpls, MN
Posts: 27,582
Default Re: tudor top material

My 29 Tudor came with a replacement short grain. I think it looks a little better than today's long grain, but I'd be OK with either one. The original has a flatter surface than what's sold today. I don't think I have a picture of the original material.
Tom Wesenberg is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
Old 10-08-2013, 08:46 AM   #3
Steve Plucker
BANNED
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Walla Walla, Washington USA
Posts: 6,066
Default Re: tudor top material

The original top material on my February 1929 Tudor was the long grain material.

Now on the other hand...My September 1929 Standard Coupe had short grain.

Pluck

Last edited by Steve Plucker; 10-08-2013 at 09:06 AM.
Steve Plucker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2013, 10:24 AM   #4
mot
Registered User
 
mot's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Sacramento Ca
Posts: 1,179
Default Re: tudor top material

heres an original
tom
Attached Images
File Type: jpg DSC01265.jpg (56.5 KB, 70 views)
mot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2013, 03:53 PM   #5
Marco Tahtaras
Senior Member
 
Marco Tahtaras's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 3,099
Default Re: tudor top material

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mitch//pa View Post
according to the judging standards acceptable top material for the 28-31 tudor is either long or short grain. what do you guys prefer and why..
That is a common interpretation but not exactly correct. It actually says course "long-short" grain and for the open models is states fine "long-short" grain. That is what they've been called in the industry for at least 65 years. and what George DeAngelis came up with when writing articles for the Model "A" News in the 1960's. It seems most folks want to separate that into two differing words.

There were no options.

__________________
http://www.abarnyard.com/
Marco Tahtaras is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2013, 03:59 PM   #6
Mitch//pa
BANNED
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Bucks County, PA
Posts: 11,454
Default Re: tudor top material

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
marco thanks for clarifying the situation
i would have never figured that out the way its stated in the standards it is confusing.
Mitch//pa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2013, 04:06 PM   #7
John Butts in CT
Senior Member
 
John Butts in CT's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Southeastern Connecticut
Posts: 464
Default Re: tudor top material

Marco's photo could be my Tudor when I bought it in 1967. It was a fresh top (NOS?) then, and it's still going strong.
John Butts in CT is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:49 PM.