|
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
12-30-2019, 09:29 PM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Texas Gulf Coast
Posts: 727
|
Looking for a better rear end
I'm wanting to go to a stronger rear end for my 55 Faielane, it has an 8 inch in it now. I rebuilt it to give me some time to find a better one. Some on here have mentioned one from a Ford ranger that is the same width and might get one that has a locking differential. I think it was mentioned that the rear end was an 8.8 inch. If anyone of you have that info. I would like to have it, i'm in no big hurry, but am concerned about the 8 inch may not be strong enough for my engine. It is a 302 c.i., Edelbrock Performer intake with Weber 4 barrel, headers with duels. It has a cam, but I don't know which. It idles kinda rough, so I know it's more than a mild one. I like to get into it once in a while and don't think the 8 inch is going to last, have no idea what the HP of the engine is, but when I shift the C4 from low to 2nd it squells the tire. God that's fun. Al
|
12-30-2019, 10:02 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Detroit suburb, MI
Posts: 3,706
|
Re: Looking for a better rear end
If you get a rear axle from an old Ranger, make sure it had a 4.0L V-6. The 4 cyl. Rangers came with a smaller axle. Pretty sure all of the Explorers came with an 8.8".
Also, if there is still a tag on one of the rear gear cover bolts, it will have the gear ratio on it. If it has an "L" after it, that means it's a limited slip (posi). Sal |
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
12-30-2019, 10:06 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: IN A 'GALAXIE' FAR FAR AWAY
Posts: 6,485
|
Re: Looking for a better rear end
If that is a later 8" FORD rear w/ removable carrier, it should be more than strong enough. Otherwise you should consider a 9". Changing gears under the car makes no sense.
__________________
***** We should have a contest. The player has to start at the very last post of a thread & then try to guess what the OP's original question was about ... |
12-30-2019, 10:51 PM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 525
|
Re: Looking for a better rear end
I am running a 9” under my 56. I put this in many years ago so do not know the year but believe it was a late 50,s so bolted right in. From the axle ends should have 31 spline axles, but hat pulled them to be sure. Finding a early one would be a problem.
|
12-31-2019, 01:29 AM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 104
|
Re: Looking for a better rear end
57-59 Ford 9" is a bolt in. They were orginally 28 spline axels but 31 spline will fit if you want a 31 spline center section. Been running 28 spline for years with no issues. Would take a lot to break a 28 spline. I ran a 300 horse 312 hard for years and finlaly twisted off an orginal axel. Running 400 horse 312 now and haven't broken anything yet.
|
12-31-2019, 11:26 AM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Santa Maria, CA
Posts: 985
|
Re: Looking for a better rear end
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
__________________
Alan 1929 Special Coupe 1941 Pick-Up 1955 Victoria |
12-31-2019, 01:20 PM | #7 |
BANNED
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Utica, Ohio
Posts: 522
|
Re: Looking for a better rear end
Many years ago I ran a '63 Fairlane with a well built 289 and 8" rear end with no failures. The size of the tires determines the load on the rear gears. You can't get big enough tires under a stock bodied '55 Fairlane to hurt a 8". I have a '88 Ranger with a well built 302 and 7.5" limited slip that I punish often with no problem. Have fun!
|
12-31-2019, 03:33 PM | #8 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 525
|
Re: Looking for a better rear end
Quote:
You have better luck with them I did. I had a 66 mustang with a fairly stout 289 and blew the spider gears on a 8". Hit 2nd. gear and kablooy. Got a tow home. |
|
12-31-2019, 08:38 PM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Midland Park, NJ
Posts: 3,982
|
Re: Looking for a better rear end
With the right parts, a 8 inch can be made very stout and handle lots of horsepower. Traction locks are available. Other wise, a 9 inch from a 57/58 (bolt in) are strong, lots of aftermarket stuff for them.
__________________
48 Ford Conv 56 Tbird 54 Ford Victoria |
12-31-2019, 02:29 PM | #10 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Phoenix,AZ
Posts: 1,417
|
Re: Looking for a better rear end
Quote:
|
|
01-23-2020, 10:01 PM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Texas Gulf Coast
Posts: 727
|
Re: Looking for a better rear end
Watched video, makes me want to build one myself. That guy explains things very well.
|
01-27-2020, 10:43 AM | #12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: IN A 'GALAXIE' FAR FAR AWAY
Posts: 6,485
|
Re: Looking for a better rear end
For fans of the 8.8", research C-CLIP ELIMINATORS.
__________________
***** We should have a contest. The player has to start at the very last post of a thread & then try to guess what the OP's original question was about ... |
12-31-2019, 08:47 PM | #13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Texas Gulf Coast
Posts: 727
|
Re: Looking for a better rear end
Thanks JeffB that's what info. I am looking for. Al
|
12-31-2019, 10:49 PM | #14 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: St. Michael, Minnesota
Posts: 1,713
|
Re: Looking for a better rear end
I used a Ranger Supercab 4X4 with a trailer hitch. It had an axle 56 and 5/8 flange to flange, 3.73 traction loc, and I don't remember what year. About 92 or 93 when the cab got wider, the axles did too. Get the narrow one. The small engined Rangers had small brakes, don't go there. I beat on that 8.8 for years with a built 312, and someone else is beating on it now. It never failed me.
|
01-01-2020, 11:19 AM | #15 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: SoCal-Redlands
Posts: 3,024
|
Re: Looking for a better rear end
I have one of the narrower Ranger rear ends that I'm considering for my '54 Ranch Wagon. The WMS to WMS dimensions are just a tab bit less than the original rear end which should make removing the rear tires easier and there is enough back space so the narrower width isn't an issue. The Ranger rear had the smaller brakes but the larger brakes from the later and wider Ranger rear end are a true direct bolt on. I plan on running a stock 302 with an AOD so I'm not worried about the Ranger rear end not being strong enough.
__________________
Making the simple complicated for over 30 years. |
01-01-2020, 11:45 AM | #16 |
BANNED
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Utica, Ohio
Posts: 522
|
Re: Looking for a better rear end
The early Mustang GT had a 7.5" rear end same as Ranger except four bolt axle and drums. They were also limited slip. Had a '83 GT Mustang. Put over 200K trouble free miles on it.
|
01-01-2020, 01:24 PM | #17 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Rathdrum Idaho
Posts: 737
|
Re: Looking for a better rear end
Quote:
|
|
01-02-2020, 02:51 AM | #18 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Phoenix,AZ
Posts: 1,417
|
Re: Looking for a better rear end
Quote:
|
|
01-02-2020, 08:30 AM | #19 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Birmingham, AL
Posts: 815
|
Re: Looking for a better rear end
A 57 - 59 Ford is 57.25" flange to flange. The 95 - 01 Explorer is 59.5" flange to flange, common as dirt, 3.73 and 4.11 all had T-locks, can be narrowed easily by getting a second "short side" axle, all were 8.8 and while not bullet proof will handle most anything a street tire will give it.
__________________
Bill, certified Ford nut. 2016 F-150 2016 Focus 08 Shelby GT500 57 Ford Ranchero 36 Chevy, 351C/FMX, 8", Mustang II |
01-02-2020, 08:39 AM | #20 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Phoenix,AZ
Posts: 1,417
|
Re: Looking for a better rear end
Quote:
Last edited by JeffB2; 01-02-2020 at 02:15 PM. |
|
|
|
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|