Go Back   The Ford Barn > General Discussion > Model A (1928-31)

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-03-2014, 06:20 PM   #1
29spcoupe
Senior Member
 
29spcoupe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Rhinebeck, NY
Posts: 763
Default 7 tooth vs 2 tooth steering

I just replaced the steering balls on my 29 Special Coupe. The steering is much better now that I don't feel the 'flat' spots when turning the steering wheel. My brother has a 31 that seems to steer in such a way that the steering wheel goes back to straight after turning a corner. My 29 doesn't do that. Is this typical of 7 tooth compared to 2 tooth steering? He also has 600x16 wheels and tires and I have 450x21 wheels and tires. Just wondering if I need to look somewhere else or not. Regards, John
29spcoupe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2014, 08:44 PM   #2
glenn in camino
Senior Member
 
glenn in camino's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Camino, CA.
Posts: 3,086
Default Re: 7 tooth vs 2 tooth steering

Your caster is not correct.
glenn in camino is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
Old 11-04-2014, 01:33 AM   #3
Synchro909
Senior Member
 
Synchro909's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 7,564
Default Re: 7 tooth vs 2 tooth steering

If you lower the ball at the back of the A frame, you increase the caster angle. Adaptors are available here but I'm not sure about in the US. They are not hard to make anyway.
Lower the ball by 5/8" equals 1 degree extra caster.
I have done this on the car in which I do long distances - makes it far more pleasant to drive.
Synchro909 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2014, 11:30 AM   #4
P.S.
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: California
Posts: 1,753
Default Re: 7 tooth vs 2 tooth steering

If your 2-tooth steering box is too tight (it's the adjustment on top closest to the firewall), then there will bee too much drag on the bearing, and your box will be too stiff to naturally return to center.

Castor uses the weight of the car to naturally center the steering. However, the force is minimal. Adjusting the castor by screwing up your radius ball setup is not recommended. Unless you have a bent front axle, the 1 degree you gain from monkeying with the radius ball isn't the solution. You already have several degrees of castor as Henry built it.
P.S. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2014, 06:16 PM   #5
29spcoupe
Senior Member
 
29spcoupe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Rhinebeck, NY
Posts: 763
Default Re: 7 tooth vs 2 tooth steering

I will check the steering box, thanks. Checked my caster, its at 5 degrees. I have a 7 tooth steering. Is the adjustment at the same place? Thanks, John
29spcoupe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2014, 07:08 PM   #6
Patrick L.
Senior Member
 
Patrick L.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Largo Florida
Posts: 7,225
Default Re: 7 tooth vs 2 tooth steering

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
The 7 and 2 tooth boxes are different animals. The 2 tooth box has 4 adjustments which need to be made in correct order.

Caster can help with steering wheel return. Lower/less caster helps with that. Higher/more caster helps with high speed tracking. These cars are suppose to have 5º. A degree either way won't hurt anything.

That said, overall steering system condition should have more to do with proper steering than just caster.
Patrick L. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2014, 09:13 PM   #7
SAJ
Senior Member
 
SAJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 518
Default Re: 7 tooth vs 2 tooth steering

I notice the same problem as 29SPCOUPE. My early RHD 1930 roadster has a 7 tooth box and short pitman arm. Wheels off the ground, the steering is light. The balls are all new, ball sockets "easy steer" (plastic but not teflon by the look of them). The weight is on the kingpin thrust bearings, as evidenced by the fact they will not turn when weighted but will turn free when the wheels are off the ground. There is about 1-1/2 inches of backlash at the steering wheel rim.
The steering wheel has to be lugged much more than my late 31 Tudor with 2 tooth box and about 1/2 inch backlash at the steering wheel. the latter self-centres more easily than the roadster too. It is lighter, yet has a full length pitman arm and worn steering balls with steel cups. Steering in the Tudor seems altogether more "lively" than the Roadster's and I too wonder whether this is a characteristic difference of the 7 and 2 tooth boxes. Both boxes have Penrite steering lube in them, full to the top.
Both have steel wishbone balls in good condition and set at correct height with original spacers and springs. I have not measured the caster in either, but I did reset the camber in the roadster to specification (it had only 1/4 degree before I increased it). Tudor camber is about the same as the roadster. Chassis at the front of the roadster is bent about 5/8 inch to the right and whoever installed the front rubber engine mounts (non standard) did so in-line with the engine, so they are off centre on the front chassis member and the crank handle does not fit nicely in the pulley dog because of this. I will fix this some time, and wonder whether this will effect the steering feel somewhat. I guess the car crabs down the road a bit (front and back axles are out of line by about 5/8 inch), but holds a very stable line at speed.
Is the 7 tooth known to steer harder and more "dead" feeling than the 7 tooth?
SAJ in NZ

Last edited by SAJ; 11-04-2014 at 09:15 PM. Reason: changed 3/4 to 5/8 after measuring
SAJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:14 AM.