|
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
03-25-2015, 05:59 PM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: New York
Posts: 943
|
Ross pistons vs Stock pistons
would it be a good idea amongst other upgrades of the rebuilding of the motor to install the Ross pistons instead of stock?
|
03-25-2015, 07:30 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: New York
Posts: 943
|
Re: Ross pistons vs Stock pistons
I think the Ross piston is a Chevy 283
|
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
03-25-2015, 08:27 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: 40 Mt.Vickery Rd. Southborough,MA 508-460-0733
Posts: 352
|
Re: Ross pistons vs Stock pistons
The Ross pistons are forged and are more costly than the stock replacements naturally.
It all depends on how much money you want to spend and how you plan on driving the car.? |
03-25-2015, 08:49 PM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: New York
Posts: 943
|
Re: Ross pistons vs Stock pistons
|
03-25-2015, 08:59 PM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 5,963
|
Re: Ross pistons vs Stock pistons
I think the wear would be similar, Use the extra money on good balancing.
|
03-25-2015, 09:13 PM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Wa.
Posts: 5,409
|
Re: Ross pistons vs Stock pistons
|
03-26-2015, 11:38 AM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Temecula, CA
Posts: 4,089
|
Re: Ross pistons vs Stock pistons
Cast pistons are stiffer and usually require less piston-to-wall clearance, therefore the pistons don't rock as much resulting in longer ring wear. Try and get pistons with modern rings as they seal better than original A rings. I use Ross pistons in my race engine and think they are the best for that purpose.
|
03-26-2015, 12:07 PM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: ca.
Posts: 2,522
|
Re: Ross pistons vs Stock pistons
I have ross in my daily driver + aluminum rods . very happy ........ steve
__________________
V4f |
03-27-2015, 03:50 PM | #9 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: South California
Posts: 6,188
|
Re: Ross pistons vs Stock pistons
Quote:
If you are not machinists/engine builder, YOU will have to tell builder/assembler what you have, as parts, and what you want to end up with. As to your question about using Ross pistons ('good idea'). Yeah, if I had 'spare cash', they are said to be excellent quality pistons that I'd liked to have included. But, are they needed..no. I could have bought 2 to three sets of the pistons/pins/rings that I used, for the price of one Ross set. These engines (A/B) are bottomless pits to throw money into..if you have it to throw,eh Here's question back to you....if I had the money to have any BUILDER in the country to build my A/B , who would that be ? IMO, that BEST builder would make you engine work better/longer than any high dollar parts ever could when put together by , say me ! Last edited by hardtimes; 03-27-2015 at 04:04 PM. Reason: ......... |
|
03-27-2015, 07:30 PM | #10 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: New York
Posts: 943
|
Re: Ross pistons vs Stock pistons
Quote:
|
|
03-27-2015, 09:03 PM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Wa.
Posts: 5,409
|
Re: Ross pistons vs Stock pistons
Dan Price at one time made an aluminum head that looked stock and was about 7.5 to 1. They had some problems with hangover but could be welded to work.
Just about any head can be filled and chamber machined to get any compression you want. I filled a Price finned head per his instructions to get 11 to 1. That engine is still running. |
03-28-2015, 06:30 AM | #12 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: New York
Posts: 943
|
Re: Ross pistons vs Stock pistons
Quote:
Last edited by 1929; 03-28-2015 at 06:32 AM. Reason: add more |
|
03-28-2015, 08:12 AM | #13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Upstate South Carolina
Posts: 794
|
Re: Ross pistons vs Stock pistons
I had a motor re-done several years ago with the modern rear seal. I dont think I would go that route again.
I'm sort of puzzled as to how you KNOW you're going to run gapless rings when you dont even have the pistons picked out. I think if it was me I'd go ahead with the Ross pistons and set the deck height at zero....then if you decide down the road you want to make changes most of them will be bolt-ons and you wont have to go back in the bottom end. But as others have said, the cast or hypers are going to be adequate for most people. Good Luck |
03-28-2015, 12:10 PM | #14 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Wa.
Posts: 5,409
|
Re: Ross pistons vs Stock pistons
|
03-28-2015, 05:52 PM | #15 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: New York
Posts: 943
|
Re: Ross pistons vs Stock pistons
|
03-28-2015, 06:40 PM | #16 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Wa.
Posts: 5,409
|
Re: Ross pistons vs Stock pistons
Quote:
Some races were 500 miles. Those engines were turning 5500 twice a lap. Jim Brierley on this forum, has set several records at Bonneville with babbitt engines. Babbitt has gotten a bad rap over the years from people that don't have a clue. |
|
03-28-2015, 06:56 PM | #17 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Australa Melbourne
Posts: 878
|
Re: Ross pistons vs Stock pistons
Ross pistons as are about as good as you will get without going custom and good value for the $
I have used them in A/B engines that double as street/race never had a problem other than noisy cold There are plenty of other pistons that are fitted to A/B engines available in cast , hyper and forged from different manufactures some that come to mind are Chevy Olds and Mopar With any engine it is a balance of the total combination You asked about 8-1 heads there have been heaps Winfield Weiand Simonds and many more in this range piston to head clearance becomes a issue sometimes another reason to chose a piston head combination carefully |
03-28-2015, 11:37 PM | #18 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: santa cruz, calif
Posts: 2,011
|
Re: Ross pistons vs Stock pistons
I have Ross pistons in the sedan. They have been in there for 50K miles and still running strong. One thing you need to know is that the alloy used in them expands more than modern eutectic pistons like are sold by most vendors. That means more clearance. If I remember right, my engine is .060 over and we set the piston/wall clearance to .006. Hence, when cold, the engine is loud. The pistons slap until heated up. If you want a quiet engine, they are not for you. One guy I know set his Ross' to .003 to reduce noise and they stuck on his first hill.
|
03-29-2015, 09:43 AM | #19 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: 34.22 N 118.36 W
Posts: 1,056
|
Re: Ross pistons vs Stock pistons
One fact about having custom pistons made, they can be made to any size. This means that you are not going to have to bore motor out any larger than necessary to clean up, like 030 or 060 over.
Also mentioned was the use of TotalSeal rings. Having the piston made for a specific set is far better than trying to adapt a set to your piston. The radial dimension of the rings is very important and so is tension. I can go on about this, but not necessary. Having used both Venolia and Ross, both are Top notch product and they have survived by providing quality. IMHO, worth every penny. J |
03-29-2015, 10:18 AM | #20 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Eastern Tennessee
Posts: 11,516
|
Re: Ross pistons vs Stock pistons
Just a question or two for you to ponder, ....do you think early Diesel engines were inserts, --and what was their compression ratios?
|
03-29-2015, 10:59 AM | #21 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: New York
Posts: 943
|
Re: Ross pistons vs Stock pistons
Thanks for all the opinions, I guess Ross pistons won the vote from what I heard here for a place in the total rebuild and my wallet lost an extra $400
|
|
|
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|