Go Back   The Ford Barn > General Discussion > Early V8 (1932-53)

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-11-2018, 09:50 PM   #1
Phil Gillespie
Senior Member
 
Phil Gillespie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Christchurch New Zealand
Posts: 1,611
Default 221 cu in 1939 Failed No4 Piston 1

See a few pics of the reason my No4 Cyl was not showing any compression.
Engine is 221 with 80 thou oversized piston.


The reason for this? These pistons have possibly 9 to 10 thousand miles max.
On the plus side, head, Edelbrock is unmarked, bore on this No4 is also unmarked. Intention to remove piston, identify and just get one and a set of rings and refit. However still running the spit valve guides and thinking of maybe replacing as suspect some oii usage is due to valve guide clearance.
When I got it home after a test run whe this happened, couple of good clouds of smoke into compartment. I took a set of compressions next day when cooled down .
!: 140. 2:135. 3: 132. 4: Zero!! 5: 120. 6:120. 7: 115 *: 100.
So figure to check valves at No4 as well as getting hold of a replacement piston and rings. Hope to do this in place wth engine in car.Should be possible?




You just have to move on and attend to it.
Phil NZ
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Resized Coupe Piiston 4 013.jpg (77.5 KB, 265 views)
File Type: jpg Resized Coupe Piiston 4 014.jpg (37.0 KB, 268 views)
File Type: jpg Resized Coupe Piiston 4 015.jpg (34.5 KB, 239 views)
File Type: jpg Resized Coupe Piiston 4 016.jpg (77.3 KB, 270 views)
Phil Gillespie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2018, 10:20 PM   #2
Talkwrench
Senior Member
 
Talkwrench's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 2,687
Default Re: 221 cu in 1939 Failed No4 Piston 1

Ahhh geezus... Better talk to Brian he may have some insight..
__________________
"Came too close to dying to stop living now!"
Talkwrench is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
Old 03-11-2018, 11:23 PM   #3
GEOFFNZ
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Oxford New Zealand
Posts: 177
Default Re: 221 cu in 1939 Failed No4 Piston 1

Hi Phil.That is not good.Any sign of the piston hitting the cylinder head,Geoff
GEOFFNZ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2018, 03:59 AM   #4
Phil Gillespie
Senior Member
 
Phil Gillespie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Christchurch New Zealand
Posts: 1,611
Default Re: 221 cu in 1939 Failed No4 Piston 1

Nope Geoff as the cylinder head is in good order.The pic is of that section of cylinder head above No4 piston. Only idea I currently have is this piston No4 & No1 had a problem with spark plug gaps closing up to almost nothing. Hence combustion would not have been good. Maybe some carbon build up.
I eventually ended up putting an extra seal washer on both spark plugs and they then retianed the spark gap and plugs as checked were a nice tan colour. Previously were showing slightly oily dark.
Once i get the piston out will then begin search for a piston and rings.
These type of valves with the split guides will come out complete once valve guide retainer is removed?
Phil NZ
Phil Gillespie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2018, 04:17 AM   #5
flatheadmurre
Senior Member
 
flatheadmurre's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Sweden
Posts: 3,045
Default Re: 221 cu in 1939 Failed No4 Piston 1

The guides will come out in one piece...and hopefuly without to much bad language.
A K-D valve guide puller is your best friend for that job.
Since thoose pistons arenīt ford finding a weight matched couple might be a challenge...you can just cut so much weight off and if they are heavy slugs itīs even worse.
flatheadmurre is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2018, 05:20 AM   #6
Phil Gillespie
Senior Member
 
Phil Gillespie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Christchurch New Zealand
Posts: 1,611
Default Re: 221 cu in 1939 Failed No4 Piston 1

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
Ok so I can remove, hopefully if all is free, the complete valve and spring, and retainer, by just removal of the horseshoe and then dismantle valve out of engine. These being split guide with mushroom at valve stem? Yes.?
Phil NZ
Phil Gillespie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2018, 05:40 AM   #7
Ggmac
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Lake worth Florida
Posts: 1,100
Default Re: 221 cu in 1939 Failed No4 Piston 1

Did a spark plug electrode let go ?
Ggmac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2018, 05:41 AM   #8
51 MERC-CT
Senior Member
 
51 MERC-CT's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: East Hartford, Ct
Posts: 5,898
Default Re: 221 cu in 1939 Failed No4 Piston 1

Don't remember ever seeing registration marks on top of the pistons that big and deep. Look almost big and deep enough to alter the compression ratio.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg reg m.jpg (166.1 KB, 582 views)
__________________
DON'T RECALL DOING SOMETHING FOR MYSELF BASED ON SOMEONE ELSE'S LIKES OR DISLIKES
51 MERC-CT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2018, 05:44 AM   #9
Ggmac
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Lake worth Florida
Posts: 1,100
Default Re: 221 cu in 1939 Failed No4 Piston 1

Ok , how much nitrous did you use ?
Ggmac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2018, 07:25 AM   #10
tubman
Senior Member
 
tubman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Minnesota, Florida Keys
Posts: 10,319
Default Re: 221 cu in 1939 Failed No4 Piston 1

This may be completely unrelated, but the last time I saw something like that was on a snowmobile we were racing. The leaner you get 'em, the faster they'll go until something like this would happen.
tubman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2018, 07:36 AM   #11
flatford8
Senior Member
 
flatford8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Lyman,ME.
Posts: 2,630
Default Re: 221 cu in 1939 Failed No4 Piston 1

There doesn’t look like enough carbon to cause a plug gap to change. ( If I read the post correctly)....:Mark
__________________
I'm thinkin' about crankin'
My ragged ol' truck up
and haulin' myself into town.
Billy Joe Shaver
flatford8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2018, 07:38 AM   #12
marko39
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: harpursville ny
Posts: 1,040
Default Re: 221 cu in 1939 Failed No4 Piston 1

if valve and guide wont come out as an assembly, pry up spring and remove retainer and then spring. lift valve and tap out guides with a thin punch. take care not to bend spring too much unless you have a spare.
marko39 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2018, 07:45 AM   #13
Admiral
Senior Member
 
Admiral's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Oakland County, Michigan
Posts: 562
Default Re: 221 cu in 1939 Failed No4 Piston 1

Sorry to hear what happened! I wonder what the culprit could be, as everything is pretty spotless in there. Carbon buildup wouldn't be my guess.
Admiral is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2018, 07:52 AM   #14
JSeery
Member Emeritus
 
JSeery's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Wichita KS
Posts: 16,132
Default Re: 221 cu in 1939 Failed No4 Piston 1

If it was me, I would be looking for a set of 8 new pistons.
JSeery is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2018, 07:56 AM   #15
Mart
Senior Member
 
Mart's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Solihull, England.
Posts: 8,754
Default Re: 221 cu in 1939 Failed No4 Piston 1

Would I be completely off base by thinking, if it were me, If I could find a piston, I'd reuse the existing rings? In my mind, the rings are bedded to that bore equally as well as the other 7 piston/ring/bore sets.

It does beg the question, though, why did that one let go? If due to lean mixture, there should be 3 other pistons that might have been getting fuel and air from the same side of the carb. (Assuming single carb). If it is a defective piston, what is to say the others are not on the verge of letting go?

If you can find one piston, all well and good, cross your fingers and carry on. If not it might be worth going with a new set of pistons and rings and a freshen up of the bores with a hone to seat the new rings, or go .100 over on all 8 with a new overbore.

Personally I'm a chancer and would just change the 1 if a replacement could be found, but that might be the clincher. You might not be able to find just 1 and be able to weight match it to the rest.

Good luck with it, though.

Re the valves, you should be able to pull the guide(s) down with the correct tool and withdraw the whole assembly in one go. Remember on the inlets it is often easier to push the guide down with a suitable lever.

You push the guides down just a bit to get the horseshoe clips out.

Mart.
Mart is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2018, 08:10 AM   #16
alanwoodieman
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: upstate SC
Posts: 2,963
Default Re: 221 cu in 1939 Failed No4 Piston 1

if the gaps on the plugs are closing then- too long on the reach of the spark plugs--exam the sparkplug thread area- have they been counterboared? we have used double seal rings on several spark plugs used with aluminum heads to correct this reach
alanwoodieman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2018, 08:23 AM   #17
40 Deluxe
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: now Kuna, Idaho
Posts: 3,779
Default Re: 221 cu in 1939 Failed No4 Piston 1

Could be #4 went lean. check the intake gasket. If it's an aluminum intake, check the exhaust crossover passage for burn through. I'm not sure which cylinder(s) this would affect, but worth checking. A closed-up plug gap wouldn't cause this. A weak or no spark would make that cylinder run cooler, and this is an excessive heat problem.
Also, could two plug wires have been crossed? This could cause extremely advanced timing in #4, resulting in detonation.
40 Deluxe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2018, 08:51 AM   #18
JSeery
Member Emeritus
 
JSeery's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Wichita KS
Posts: 16,132
Default Re: 221 cu in 1939 Failed No4 Piston 1

Very hard to tell much from photos, but that piston and cylinder head doesn't look like it has been that hot. That coupled with the overall look of the pistons (they look like low quality, but again based on a photo!), I would suspect piston failure. It could have been a detonation issue, but the piston seems thin in the failed area. The amount of work involved finding a piston and getting it to match weight wise, etc, it would be simpler to just replace the lot. But then, that is what I would do.
JSeery is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2018, 09:00 AM   #19
Phil Gillespie
Senior Member
 
Phil Gillespie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Christchurch New Zealand
Posts: 1,611
Default Re: 221 cu in 1939 Failed No4 Piston 1

Yes Alanwoodieman that was the case with these Edelbrock heads the 2 plugs in 1 & 4 wennt too far into the head. These were new heads with this finish! Made offshore and not as would expect. That was why i fitted extra washer at those 2 cylinders to reduce distance into combustion space.
Phil Gillespie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2018, 09:03 AM   #20
Seth Swoboda
Senior Member
 
Seth Swoboda's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Southern Illinois
Posts: 3,795
Default Re: 221 cu in 1939 Failed No4 Piston 1

His pistons look like mine. Mine are Egge. I would assume Egge has a good quality piston.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg pistons.jpg (57.3 KB, 191 views)
Seth Swoboda is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:38 AM.