Go Back   The Ford Barn > General Discussion > Early V8 (1932-53)

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-07-2015, 05:57 PM   #1
corvette8n
Senior Member
 
corvette8n's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: 36 miles north of Albany NY
Posts: 2,979
Default 239 OHV vs flathead

Does the 1954 239 OHV share any parts with the 8BA flathead?

Last edited by corvette8n; 08-08-2015 at 09:44 AM. Reason: Spelling
corvette8n is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2015, 06:03 PM   #2
V8COOPMAN
Senior Member
 
V8COOPMAN's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: East Shore of LAKE HOUSTON
Posts: 11,136
Default Re: 239 OHV vs flathead

Not even the bore and stroke. DD
__________________
Click Links Below __


'35-'36 W/8BA & MECHANICAL FAN


T5 W/TORQUE TUBE
V8COOPMAN is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
Old 08-07-2015, 06:22 PM   #3
skidmarks
Senior Member
 
skidmarks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: newark, delaware
Posts: 3,735
Default Re: 239 OHV vs flathead

Pilot bearing. Sparkplugs. I think maybe the points and condenser
skidmarks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2015, 06:25 PM   #4
Walt Dupont--Me.
Senior Member
 
Walt Dupont--Me.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Gardiner Me.
Posts: 4,200
Default Re: 239 OHV vs flathead

I hope your not trying to get parts for that engine. There scarser than hens teeth. That's one year only 1954, Walt
Walt Dupont--Me. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2015, 07:52 PM   #5
skidmarks
Senior Member
 
skidmarks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: newark, delaware
Posts: 3,735
Default Re: 239 OHV vs flathead

Performance wise its rhe lamest of the y block motors.
skidmarks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2015, 08:52 PM   #6
40cpe
Senior Member
 
40cpe's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Star, MS
Posts: 4,032
Default Re: 239 OHV vs flathead

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
When I was a teenager I had a '37 coupe. When the warmed over flathead expired I put a '54 engine in it. I couldn't tell any more more power from the OHV. I traded it to a friend and he put an Edsel 430 in it. That woke it up.
40cpe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2015, 09:04 PM   #7
Tinker
Senior Member
 
Tinker's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: MN
Posts: 7,063
Default Re: 239 OHV vs flathead

I gave away a 54 yblock just last year. Not the best of the yblocks. Lot of odd ball little things. Some can be converted to later stuff though. I'm 99 percent sure the intake manifold is a one year thing, making it a 2 barrel deal. Or maybe a sling shot adaptation. But not 100 percent on the intake.
Tinker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2015, 09:06 PM   #8
Drbrown
Senior Member
 
Drbrown's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Glens Falls NY
Posts: 1,267
Default Re: 239 OHV vs flathead

Had a '54 ohv. Did not like that car or its engine. My experience was that the engine performance was void of any spirit and it had troubles with valve train. The later 289 was a winner .... put a 1965 in my 17 foot ski boat and it really hustled .... still runs too.
Drbrown is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2015, 09:08 PM   #9
skidmarks
Senior Member
 
skidmarks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: newark, delaware
Posts: 3,735
Default Re: 239 OHV vs flathead

Intakes had smaller ports. Edelbrock even made a small port Intake for them. There was a factory 1954 castiron small port 4 barrel used a teapot carb like the 55/56:
skidmarks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2015, 09:13 PM   #10
Tinker
Senior Member
 
Tinker's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: MN
Posts: 7,063
Default Re: 239 OHV vs flathead

Thanks skids for the education.
Tinker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2015, 09:15 PM   #11
Tinker
Senior Member
 
Tinker's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: MN
Posts: 7,063
Default Re: 239 OHV vs flathead

Will the later intakes bolt to the 54?
Tinker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2015, 09:41 PM   #12
paul2748
Senior Member
 
paul2748's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Midland Park, NJ
Posts: 4,017
Default Re: 239 OHV vs flathead

Physically they will bolt up but I going to say no because there is serious port mismatch in the later intakes because of the bigger port size on the later intakes. Some have done it successfully but it really is a hit and miss operation.

The only four bbl manifold that works is the 54 Merc. Pretty rare now a days.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tinker View Post
Will the later intakes bolt to the 54?
__________________
48 Ford Conv
56 Tbird
54 Ford Victoria
paul2748 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2015, 09:47 PM   #13
Tinker
Senior Member
 
Tinker's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: MN
Posts: 7,063
Default Re: 239 OHV vs flathead

I suposse you could do some port grinding but you'd just be putting hard work into a pointless endeavor. Maybe.




.

Last edited by Tinker; 08-07-2015 at 10:03 PM. Reason: Clarify a sentence
Tinker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2015, 10:00 PM   #14
dixiedelux
Member
 
dixiedelux's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Columbia, KY
Posts: 89
Default Re: 239 OHV vs flathead

I had a stock, original 239 in a f-100. It ws so sorry, and tired, it would not pull high gear, if any extended grade, however slight, was encountered.
dixiedelux is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:16 AM.