|
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
05-01-2019, 04:26 PM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Fort dodge, Iowa
Posts: 825
|
1936 LB marking
If a 1936 engine has an LB marking, is it visible with the intake manifold installed? Is it always at the front of the left bank?
|
05-01-2019, 04:38 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 8,149
|
Re: 1936 LB marking
On the ones I've looked at, the LB marking is visible with the intake manifold in place - front of the left bank....
__________________
The only thing nice about being imperfect is the joy it brings to others.... "Silver rings, your butt! Them's washers!" "We shot our way out of that town for a dollar's worth of steel holes!" - from 'The Wild Bunch' - 1969 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7NReUd2_0u0 |
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
05-01-2019, 04:38 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: on the Littlefield
Posts: 6,159
|
Re: 1936 LB marking
I have 3 lb blocks, none marked---- perhaps the oil pan can tell by shape or hammer dents out to clear front main bolts
|
05-01-2019, 06:09 PM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Oro Valley, AZ
Posts: 435
|
Re: 1936 LB marking
I have a LB engine in my '34 PU. There are no marking (LB) stamped on the top of the engine. Another LB engine we have has the LB stamped on the top of the block. Who knows what Ford did? Mike
|
05-01-2019, 09:35 PM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: East Coast in CT
Posts: 1,529
|
Re: 1936 LB marking
The LB blocks i have seen the stamping on was visible with the intake in place and location of the stamping was near the front but not sure what side.
__________________
I use the F word a lot no not that word these words Flathead , Focus and Finish. "Life Member of the Bonneville 200 MPH Club using a Ford Flathead block" Owner , Builder, Driver of the First Ford Flathead bodied roadster to run 200 MPH Record July 13, 2018 LTA timing association 200.921 in one and a half miles burning gasoline. First ever gas burning Ford flathead powered roadster to run 200 MPH at Bonneville Salt Flats setting the record August 7th 2021 at 205.744 MPH |
05-02-2019, 12:27 AM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Ms GulfCoast
Posts: 238
|
Re: 1936 LB marking
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
__________________
Regards, Todd 1936 FORD Tudor Slantback "cajunhotrodder" on instagram/youtube |
05-02-2019, 12:04 PM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Camarillo, CA and Pine Grove, CA
Posts: 2,832
|
Re: 1936 LB marking
I have to ask, what is a LB block?
__________________
1921 Runabout 1930 Tudor Early 1930 AA Speed costs money. How fast do you want to go? |
05-02-2019, 12:37 PM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Camrose, Alberta
Posts: 396
|
Re: 1936 LB marking
Chris, it's a 1936 21 stud flathead with insert bearings versus babbitt. 36 was the first year that the changeover started taking place.
|
05-02-2019, 01:26 PM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Southern Mass
Posts: 195
|
Re: 1936 LB marking
Does anyone know the correct meaning of the term LB Engine?
LB LATE BLOCK ? LB LARGE BEARING ? LB LARGE BLOCK? I’ve heard different people say different meanings. Bob |
05-02-2019, 01:39 PM | #10 |
Member Emeritus
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Wichita KS
Posts: 16,132
|
Re: 1936 LB marking
|
05-02-2019, 02:13 PM | #11 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Near Rising Sun, Maryland
Posts: 10,858
|
Re: 1936 LB marking
Quote:
I also have several '36 LB engines that do not have LB stampings on intake deck.
__________________
John "Never give up on what you really want to do. The person with big dreams is more powerful than one with all the facts". Albert Einstein |
|
05-02-2019, 02:37 PM | #12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Mt. Holly,NJ
Posts: 1,822
|
Re: 1936 LB marking
|
05-02-2019, 02:39 PM | #13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Mt. Holly,NJ
Posts: 1,822
|
Re: 1936 LB marking
Beware of frauds stamping a reg block to get a better prrice.
|
05-02-2019, 05:07 PM | #14 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Eureka Calif.
Posts: 969
|
Re: 1936 LB marking
From what I've read,the LB main bearing studs are 4-1/4 inches apart on center.
|
05-02-2019, 05:42 PM | #15 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Charlotte NC KiWi-L100 available here
Posts: 2,963
|
Re: 1936 LB marking
Okay I hope I get this right but hopefully Brian will chime in to correct me. New Zealand 36 LB engines out of Canada have a hole in the front of oil pan rail about 1/2 diameter at front between water pump & crank seal casting opening in front of block. Very easily distinguished
|
05-02-2019, 05:56 PM | #16 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 16,436
|
Re: 1936 LB marking
That sounds like the crankcase vent. The venting was added in 1935 which was the same year that the large bearing change came about in late 1935. Water pumps were in the head unless you mean the engine mount spigot for water inlet to the engine.
Main bearing bolt or stud distance apart is the best way to know for sure. |
05-02-2019, 06:02 PM | #17 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Charlotte NC KiWi-L100 available here
Posts: 2,963
|
Re: 1936 LB marking
Not crank case vent
It’s in casting space between water inlet & crank seal |
05-02-2019, 08:01 PM | #18 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Lancaster PA
Posts: 535
|
Re: 1936 LB marking
I think it means Liner Bearing.
I also have one with no LB stamp. |
05-02-2019, 08:40 PM | #19 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Upper Peninsula, Michigan
Posts: 604
|
Re: 1936 LB marking
It's been said they were only marked with "LB" if the engine was serviced in a rebuild or such after leaving the OEM factory.
|
05-02-2019, 10:07 PM | #20 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Ms GulfCoast
Posts: 238
|
Re: 1936 LB marking
Great info guys!
__________________
Regards, Todd 1936 FORD Tudor Slantback "cajunhotrodder" on instagram/youtube |
05-02-2019, 10:25 PM | #21 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Shelton, WA
Posts: 3,800
|
Re: 1936 LB marking
The LB marks can be all over the place. Mine is on the RH side in the back by the fuel pump stand and can be seen with the intake on. I always understood that it was for Large Bearing as the crank main are larger then the earlier babbit ones.
And the main studs are 1/4 inch wider then the earlier ones. |
05-03-2019, 02:38 AM | #22 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Masterton, New Zealand
Posts: 3,834
|
Re: 1936 LB marking
KiWinUS is correct as regards Canadian blocks; all Canadian blocks since and including the 36 LB block, have an approximately 5/8" dia hole in front of oil pan mating surface, behind the pulley. They also have another similar hole at rear of oil pan mating surface which is only visible with the pan removed. I can only assume these two holes were machined to locate the block into fixtures for subsequent machining operations in the factory.Anyway, as that front hole is easy to see/feel, if a early style block, ie pump in head, is found that carries said hole, it is a 100% sure indication that it has liner bearings [LB block]. No babbitted main bearing engines carry this identification.
Again, USA LB blocks do not have this feature, Canadian only!
__________________
Unfortunately, two half wits don't make a whole wit! |
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
05-03-2019, 03:35 AM | #23 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Upper Peninsula, Michigan
Posts: 604
|
Re: 1936 LB marking
In the '36 production year babbit and LB blocks were both produced. Who knows the percentages..... It was Oct. of '35 that LB blocks started into production.
With the introduction of '37 production and all the changes involved there who really knows if LB type blocks were produced into the '37 production year. Interesting subject. |
05-03-2019, 06:50 AM | #24 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Charlotte NC KiWi-L100 available here
Posts: 2,963
|
Re: 1936 LB marking
Here is a basket of LB blocks in Christchurch NZ & if you enlarge you will see the hole in pan rail of block front left of pile
|
05-03-2019, 02:14 PM | #25 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 1,770
|
Re: 1936 LB marking
with the intake manafold off if it,s a babbit block you will see holes where the main bearing bolts are held with a squre nut
|
05-03-2019, 04:45 PM | #26 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Eureka Calif.
Posts: 969
|
Re: 1936 LB marking
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
|
05-03-2019, 06:10 PM | #27 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 16,436
|
Re: 1936 LB marking
The 78 block was a change for the 1937 engine production with the low mounted water pumps so that would have started with 1937 production. The LBs were started up in late 1935. They likely just had a lot of older blocks to use up in the assembly line process at various assembly plants so both were around in late 1935 and early 1936. This is why they stamped them so they could tell the difference, not that it made all that much difference. Either block would work in that time frame.
Ford of Canada always did things differently even if the differences were subtle. |
05-04-2019, 07:21 AM | #28 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Upper Peninsula, Michigan
Posts: 604
|
Re: 1936 LB marking
Thing is though, there are a lot of LB blocks out there with no stamping "LB"
All in U.S. Ford manufacturing were produced at the Rouge. How are so many LB blocks not stamped? |
05-04-2019, 07:45 AM | #29 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Schooley's Mountain
Posts: 530
|
Re: 1936 LB marking
|
05-04-2019, 10:28 AM | #30 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Upper Peninsula, Michigan
Posts: 604
|
Re: 1936 LB marking
I believe they were manufactered in Windsor, Ontario.
|
05-04-2019, 11:36 AM | #31 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 16,436
|
Re: 1936 LB marking
Ford of Canada was a separate company from Ford Dearborn. They did things a lot like their counterpart but they made plant changes in a different way than Dearborn did. Windsor or Walkerville was where they set up their own foundry. The River Rough plant was just a ways down and across the Detroit River from there but it was a separate operation in every respect. More aluminum was used for castings and they marked things differently were just a few of the manufacturing differences.
|
05-04-2019, 12:13 PM | #32 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 258
|
Re: 1936 LB marking
Quote:
" Re: Engine Block ID pictures " Post # 14 LB main studs are 3 1/4 " center to center ---- poured babbit 21 stud mains are 3" ctr to ctr. I like all these Flathead Fords! Fun! Keep them running! Thanks Gene Tulsa |
|
05-04-2019, 12:51 PM | #33 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 258
|
Re: 1936 LB marking
|
05-04-2019, 01:31 PM | #34 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Eureka Calif.
Posts: 969
|
Re: 1936 LB marking
Looks like I screwed up again.Please ignore #14 and #26. W-w-w-ong.
3-1/4 inches is correct for LB. Sorry. |
05-04-2019, 02:43 PM | #35 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 258
|
Re: 1936 LB marking
Quote:
I usually figure out something I didn't know or wasn't clear about when I make a post. Trying to learn. Nice Ford day in Tulsa. Gene |
|
06-10-2019, 07:20 AM | #36 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2016
Posts: 250
|
Re: 1936 LB marking
LB photo
|
06-10-2019, 07:48 AM | #37 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Upper Peninsula, Michigan
Posts: 604
|
Re: 1936 LB marking
That's the usual placement of the stamp.
It's been said that those stamps were placed once an engine was overhauled or some major service work performed after leaving the factory. It could be why so many aren't stamped to this day. Food for thought.... |
06-10-2019, 09:04 AM | #38 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Minnesota, USA
Posts: 138
|
Re: 1936 LB marking
Here is another picture of an LB block stamp, in this ad-
https://www.fordbarn.com/forum/showthread.php?t=181366 My '34 has an "LB engine", however the top of the block is not stamped. |
06-10-2019, 10:45 AM | #39 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2016
Posts: 250
|
Re: 1936 LB marking
Not sure about the LB being stamped after overhaul, but this engine was std bore from a 40K mile ‘36 5W. Engine was torn down, cleaned, new valves/lifters and new STD rings and bearings added. No machine work was required. The rebuilder even commented what I was doing was overkill as engine was all within tolerances and surfaces were excellent.
|
06-10-2019, 01:12 PM | #40 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Central Ohio
Posts: 5,068
|
Re: 1936 LB marking
Beings we're talking about LB blocks - what is the current situation as far as finding bearings for them? Are there any current manufacturer's, or is it a situation of having to find NOS stuff? Are there issues as far as certain sizes being unobtainium?
|
06-16-2019, 01:49 PM | #41 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Lancaster PA
Posts: 535
|
Re: 1936 LB marking
Ebay is a pretty good indication of availability, and I haven't seen squat for 36-38 main bearings for the past half dozen years, except for standard size.
I have 2 pairs of flanged rods bearings .040 u/s, have looked for others to get a price range to sell them, haven't seen any of them either. Lots of std rod bearings, a few .010, not many others. No new ones that I know of, you'd be one of the people I'd ask to find a source. |
06-16-2019, 07:01 PM | #42 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 2,687
|
Re: 1936 LB marking
xxx
__________________
"Came too close to dying to stop living now!" Last edited by Talkwrench; 06-16-2019 at 07:03 PM. Reason: doubled up |
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
06-16-2019, 07:02 PM | #43 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 2,687
|
Re: 1936 LB marking
[QUOTE=Talkwrench;1768333]"Beings we're talking about LB blocks - what is the current situation as far as finding bearings for them? Are there any current manufacturer's, or is it a situation of having to find NOS stuff? Are there issues as far as certain sizes being unobtainium?"
Finding flanged bearings are getting much harder. Mains not too bad .. ----------
__________________
"Came too close to dying to stop living now!" |
06-17-2019, 12:20 PM | #44 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Southern France
Posts: 5,307
|
Re: 1936 LB marking
Last yr I got the mains from C&G($187),the rods off EBAY.I needed .030 over was the issue On the rods and I had to settle for -.030 and +010 ($147.50 the set) .Some sellers want nearly $500 for the rod bearings.The rod bearings are the hard ones to find-at least for me.Reds is another source.Chuck Kuntz on here is another source.
Last edited by deuce lover; 06-17-2019 at 12:29 PM. |
|
|
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|