Go Back   The Ford Barn > General Discussion > Early V8 (1932-53)

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-01-2019, 04:26 PM   #1
34fordy
Senior Member
 
34fordy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Fort dodge, Iowa
Posts: 825
Default 1936 LB marking

If a 1936 engine has an LB marking, is it visible with the intake manifold installed? Is it always at the front of the left bank?
34fordy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-2019, 04:38 PM   #2
petehoovie
Senior Member
 
petehoovie's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 8,149
Default Re: 1936 LB marking

On the ones I've looked at, the LB marking is visible with the intake manifold in place - front of the left bank....
__________________
The only thing nice about being imperfect is the joy it brings to others....

"Silver rings, your butt! Them's washers!"
"We shot our way out of that town for a dollar's worth of steel holes!" - from 'The Wild Bunch' - 1969

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7NReUd2_0u0
petehoovie is online now   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
Old 05-01-2019, 04:38 PM   #3
Kurt in NJ
Senior Member
 
Kurt in NJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: on the Littlefield
Posts: 6,159
Default Re: 1936 LB marking

I have 3 lb blocks, none marked---- perhaps the oil pan can tell by shape or hammer dents out to clear front main bolts
Kurt in NJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-2019, 06:09 PM   #4
flathead34
Senior Member
 
flathead34's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Oro Valley, AZ
Posts: 435
Default Re: 1936 LB marking

I have a LB engine in my '34 PU. There are no marking (LB) stamped on the top of the engine. Another LB engine we have has the LB stamped on the top of the block. Who knows what Ford did? Mike
flathead34 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-2019, 09:35 PM   #5
Ronnieroadster
Senior Member
 
Ronnieroadster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: East Coast in CT
Posts: 1,529
Default Re: 1936 LB marking

The LB blocks i have seen the stamping on was visible with the intake in place and location of the stamping was near the front but not sure what side.
__________________
I use the F word a lot no not that word these words Flathead , Focus and Finish.
"Life Member of the Bonneville 200 MPH Club using a Ford Flathead block"
Owner , Builder, Driver of the First Ford Flathead bodied roadster to run 200 MPH Record July 13, 2018 LTA timing association 200.921 in one and a half miles burning gasoline.
First ever gas burning Ford flathead powered roadster to run 200 MPH at Bonneville Salt Flats setting the record August 7th 2021 at 205.744 MPH
Ronnieroadster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2019, 12:27 AM   #6
cajunfirehawk
Senior Member
 
cajunfirehawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Ms GulfCoast
Posts: 238
Default Re: 1936 LB marking

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
All I have seen written on these LB blocks I have never seen any pics of the actual LB stamping on a block...
__________________
Regards,
Todd

1936 FORD Tudor Slantback


"cajunhotrodder" on instagram/youtube
cajunfirehawk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2019, 12:04 PM   #7
Chris Haynes
Senior Member
 
Chris Haynes's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Camarillo, CA and Pine Grove, CA
Posts: 2,832
Default Re: 1936 LB marking

I have to ask, what is a LB block?
__________________
1921 Runabout
1930 Tudor
Early 1930 AA
Speed costs money. How fast do you want to go?
Chris Haynes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2019, 12:37 PM   #8
Ron Pilger
Senior Member
 
Ron Pilger's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Camrose, Alberta
Posts: 396
Default Re: 1936 LB marking

Chris, it's a 1936 21 stud flathead with insert bearings versus babbitt. 36 was the first year that the changeover started taking place.
Ron Pilger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2019, 01:26 PM   #9
Teltruck
Senior Member
 
Teltruck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Southern Mass
Posts: 195
Default Re: 1936 LB marking

Does anyone know the correct meaning of the term LB Engine?

LB LATE BLOCK ?
LB LARGE BEARING ?
LB LARGE BLOCK?
I’ve heard different people say different meanings.
Bob
Teltruck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2019, 01:39 PM   #10
JSeery
Member Emeritus
 
JSeery's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Wichita KS
Posts: 16,132
Default Re: 1936 LB marking

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris Haynes View Post
I have to ask, what is a LB block?
One that excepts insert bearings, verses the earlier babbitt bearings.
JSeery is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2019, 02:13 PM   #11
JM 35 Sedan
Senior Member
 
JM 35 Sedan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Near Rising Sun, Maryland
Posts: 10,858
Default Re: 1936 LB marking

Quote:
Originally Posted by Teltruck View Post
Does anyone know the correct meaning of the term LB Engine?

LB LATE BLOCK ?
LB LARGE BEARING ?
LB LARGE BLOCK?
I’ve heard different people say different meanings.
Bob
Another is "loose bearing (s)"

I also have several '36 LB engines that do not have LB stampings on intake deck.
__________________
John

"Never give up on what you really want to do. The person with big dreams is more powerful than one with all the facts". Albert Einstein
JM 35 Sedan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2019, 02:37 PM   #12
V12Bill
Senior Member
 
V12Bill's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Mt. Holly,NJ
Posts: 1,822
Default Re: 1936 LB marking

Quote:
Originally Posted by Teltruck View Post
Does anyone know the correct meaning of the term LB Engine?

LB LATE BLOCK ?
LB LARGE BEARING ?
LB LARGE BLOCK?
I’ve heard different people say different meanings.
Bob
I have heard tthat it means Large Bearing as the cap bolts are farther apart.
V12Bill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2019, 02:39 PM   #13
V12Bill
Senior Member
 
V12Bill's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Mt. Holly,NJ
Posts: 1,822
Default Re: 1936 LB marking

Beware of frauds stamping a reg block to get a better prrice.
V12Bill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2019, 05:07 PM   #14
Willit Stop
Senior Member
 
Willit Stop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Eureka Calif.
Posts: 969
Default Re: 1936 LB marking

From what I've read,the LB main bearing studs are 4-1/4 inches apart on center.
Willit Stop is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2019, 05:42 PM   #15
KiWinUS
Senior Member
 
KiWinUS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Charlotte NC KiWi-L100 available here
Posts: 2,963
Default Re: 1936 LB marking

Okay I hope I get this right but hopefully Brian will chime in to correct me. New Zealand 36 LB engines out of Canada have a hole in the front of oil pan rail about 1/2 diameter at front between water pump & crank seal casting opening in front of block. Very easily distinguished
KiWinUS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2019, 05:56 PM   #16
rotorwrench
Senior Member
 
rotorwrench's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 16,436
Default Re: 1936 LB marking

That sounds like the crankcase vent. The venting was added in 1935 which was the same year that the large bearing change came about in late 1935. Water pumps were in the head unless you mean the engine mount spigot for water inlet to the engine.

Main bearing bolt or stud distance apart is the best way to know for sure.
rotorwrench is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2019, 06:02 PM   #17
KiWinUS
Senior Member
 
KiWinUS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Charlotte NC KiWi-L100 available here
Posts: 2,963
Default Re: 1936 LB marking

Not crank case vent
It’s in casting space between water inlet & crank seal
KiWinUS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2019, 08:01 PM   #18
Yoyodyne
Senior Member
 
Yoyodyne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Lancaster PA
Posts: 535
Default Re: 1936 LB marking

I think it means Liner Bearing.
I also have one with no LB stamp.
Yoyodyne is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2019, 08:40 PM   #19
RobR'35
Senior Member
 
RobR'35's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Upper Peninsula, Michigan
Posts: 604
Default Re: 1936 LB marking

It's been said they were only marked with "LB" if the engine was serviced in a rebuild or such after leaving the OEM factory.
RobR'35 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2019, 10:07 PM   #20
cajunfirehawk
Senior Member
 
cajunfirehawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Ms GulfCoast
Posts: 238
Default Re: 1936 LB marking

Great info guys!
__________________
Regards,
Todd

1936 FORD Tudor Slantback


"cajunhotrodder" on instagram/youtube
cajunfirehawk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2019, 10:25 PM   #21
deuce_roadster
Senior Member
 
deuce_roadster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Shelton, WA
Posts: 3,800
Default Re: 1936 LB marking

The LB marks can be all over the place. Mine is on the RH side in the back by the fuel pump stand and can be seen with the intake on. I always understood that it was for Large Bearing as the crank main are larger then the earlier babbit ones.
And the main studs are 1/4 inch wider then the earlier ones.
deuce_roadster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2019, 02:38 AM   #22
Brian
Senior Member
 
Brian's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Masterton, New Zealand
Posts: 3,834
Default Re: 1936 LB marking

KiWinUS is correct as regards Canadian blocks; all Canadian blocks since and including the 36 LB block, have an approximately 5/8" dia hole in front of oil pan mating surface, behind the pulley. They also have another similar hole at rear of oil pan mating surface which is only visible with the pan removed. I can only assume these two holes were machined to locate the block into fixtures for subsequent machining operations in the factory.Anyway, as that front hole is easy to see/feel, if a early style block, ie pump in head, is found that carries said hole, it is a 100% sure indication that it has liner bearings [LB block]. No babbitted main bearing engines carry this identification.
Again, USA LB blocks do not have this feature, Canadian only!
__________________
Unfortunately, two half wits don't make a whole wit!
Brian is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
Old 05-03-2019, 03:35 AM   #23
RobR'35
Senior Member
 
RobR'35's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Upper Peninsula, Michigan
Posts: 604
Default Re: 1936 LB marking

In the '36 production year babbit and LB blocks were both produced. Who knows the percentages..... It was Oct. of '35 that LB blocks started into production.
With the introduction of '37 production and all the changes involved there who really knows if LB type blocks were produced into the '37 production year.
Interesting subject.
RobR'35 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2019, 06:50 AM   #24
KiWinUS
Senior Member
 
KiWinUS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Charlotte NC KiWi-L100 available here
Posts: 2,963
Default Re: 1936 LB marking

Here is a basket of LB blocks in Christchurch NZ & if you enlarge you will see the hole in pan rail of block front left of pile
Attached Images
File Type: jpg NZ 36 LB blocks.JPG (137.8 KB, 142 views)
KiWinUS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2019, 02:14 PM   #25
richard crow
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 1,770
Default Re: 1936 LB marking

with the intake manafold off if it,s a babbit block you will see holes where the main bearing bolts are held with a squre nut
richard crow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2019, 04:45 PM   #26
Willit Stop
Senior Member
 
Willit Stop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Eureka Calif.
Posts: 969
Default Re: 1936 LB marking

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
Sorry guys. Correction.Main bearing studs, center to center on an LB should be 3-3/4".
Willit Stop is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2019, 06:10 PM   #27
rotorwrench
Senior Member
 
rotorwrench's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 16,436
Default Re: 1936 LB marking

The 78 block was a change for the 1937 engine production with the low mounted water pumps so that would have started with 1937 production. The LBs were started up in late 1935. They likely just had a lot of older blocks to use up in the assembly line process at various assembly plants so both were around in late 1935 and early 1936. This is why they stamped them so they could tell the difference, not that it made all that much difference. Either block would work in that time frame.

Ford of Canada always did things differently even if the differences were subtle.
rotorwrench is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2019, 07:21 AM   #28
RobR'35
Senior Member
 
RobR'35's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Upper Peninsula, Michigan
Posts: 604
Default Re: 1936 LB marking

Thing is though, there are a lot of LB blocks out there with no stamping "LB"
All in U.S. Ford manufacturing were produced at the Rouge. How are so many LB blocks not stamped?
RobR'35 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2019, 07:45 AM   #29
KGS
Senior Member
 
KGS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Schooley's Mountain
Posts: 530
Default Re: 1936 LB marking

Quote:
Originally Posted by RobR'35 View Post
All in U.S. Ford manufacturing were produced at the Rouge.

Where were the Canadian engines made? Did they have a foundry and

an engine plant?
KGS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2019, 10:28 AM   #30
RobR'35
Senior Member
 
RobR'35's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Upper Peninsula, Michigan
Posts: 604
Default Re: 1936 LB marking

I believe they were manufactered in Windsor, Ontario.
RobR'35 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2019, 11:36 AM   #31
rotorwrench
Senior Member
 
rotorwrench's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 16,436
Default Re: 1936 LB marking

Ford of Canada was a separate company from Ford Dearborn. They did things a lot like their counterpart but they made plant changes in a different way than Dearborn did. Windsor or Walkerville was where they set up their own foundry. The River Rough plant was just a ways down and across the Detroit River from there but it was a separate operation in every respect. More aluminum was used for castings and they marked things differently were just a few of the manufacturing differences.
rotorwrench is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2019, 12:13 PM   #32
G32
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 258
Default Re: 1936 LB marking

Quote:
Originally Posted by Willit Stop View Post
From what I've read,the LB main bearing studs are 4-1/4 inches apart on center.
See Thread 5-3-19 titled :

" Re: Engine Block ID pictures " Post # 14

LB main studs are 3 1/4 " center to center ---- poured babbit

21 stud mains are 3" ctr to ctr.

I like all these Flathead Fords! Fun! Keep them running!

Thanks Gene Tulsa
G32 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2019, 12:51 PM   #33
G32
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 258
Default Re: 1936 LB marking

Quote:
Originally Posted by richard crow View Post
with the intake manafold off if it,s a babbit block you will see holes where the main bearing bolts are held with a squre nut
Richard ;

1932, 1933, 1934 only . Stopped in still babbit 1935 - 1936 (need to pull

pan to be sure of LB).


Thanks Gene Tulsa
G32 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2019, 01:31 PM   #34
Willit Stop
Senior Member
 
Willit Stop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Eureka Calif.
Posts: 969
Default Re: 1936 LB marking

Looks like I screwed up again.Please ignore #14 and #26. W-w-w-ong.
3-1/4 inches is correct for LB. Sorry.
Willit Stop is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2019, 02:43 PM   #35
G32
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 258
Default Re: 1936 LB marking

Quote:
Originally Posted by Willit Stop View Post
Looks like I screwed up again.Please ignore #14 and #26. W-w-w-ong.
3-1/4 inches is correct for LB. Sorry.
No sweat man ---happy you're here---happy i'm here too.

I usually figure out something I didn't know or wasn't clear about

when I make a post. Trying to learn.

Nice Ford day in Tulsa.

Gene
G32 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2019, 07:20 AM   #36
50droptop
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Posts: 250
Default Re: 1936 LB marking

Quote:
Originally Posted by cajunfirehawk View Post
All I have seen written on these LB blocks I have never seen any pics of the actual LB stamping on a block...
LB photo
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 1DD95D17-E4F6-40F0-BB02-3C21DCB962C8.jpg (33.7 KB, 110 views)
50droptop is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2019, 07:48 AM   #37
RobR'35
Senior Member
 
RobR'35's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Upper Peninsula, Michigan
Posts: 604
Default Re: 1936 LB marking

That's the usual placement of the stamp.
It's been said that those stamps were placed once an engine was overhauled or some major service work performed after leaving the factory.
It could be why so many aren't stamped to this day.
Food for thought....
RobR'35 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2019, 09:04 AM   #38
Scott/Mn
Senior Member
 
Scott/Mn's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Minnesota, USA
Posts: 138
Default Re: 1936 LB marking

Here is another picture of an LB block stamp, in this ad-
https://www.fordbarn.com/forum/showthread.php?t=181366


My '34 has an "LB engine", however the top of the block is not stamped.
Scott/Mn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2019, 10:45 AM   #39
50droptop
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Posts: 250
Default Re: 1936 LB marking

Quote:
Originally Posted by 50droptop View Post
LB photo
Not sure about the LB being stamped after overhaul, but this engine was std bore from a 40K mile ‘36 5W. Engine was torn down, cleaned, new valves/lifters and new STD rings and bearings added. No machine work was required. The rebuilder even commented what I was doing was overkill as engine was all within tolerances and surfaces were excellent.
50droptop is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2019, 01:12 PM   #40
Bored&Stroked
Senior Member
 
Bored&Stroked's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Central Ohio
Posts: 5,068
Default Re: 1936 LB marking

Beings we're talking about LB blocks - what is the current situation as far as finding bearings for them? Are there any current manufacturer's, or is it a situation of having to find NOS stuff? Are there issues as far as certain sizes being unobtainium?
Bored&Stroked is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2019, 01:49 PM   #41
Yoyodyne
Senior Member
 
Yoyodyne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Lancaster PA
Posts: 535
Default Re: 1936 LB marking

Ebay is a pretty good indication of availability, and I haven't seen squat for 36-38 main bearings for the past half dozen years, except for standard size.



I have 2 pairs of flanged rods bearings .040 u/s, have looked for others to get a price range to sell them, haven't seen any of them either. Lots of std rod bearings, a few .010, not many others.


No new ones that I know of, you'd be one of the people I'd ask to find a source.
Yoyodyne is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2019, 07:01 PM   #42
Talkwrench
Senior Member
 
Talkwrench's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 2,687
Default Re: 1936 LB marking

xxx
__________________
"Came too close to dying to stop living now!"

Last edited by Talkwrench; 06-16-2019 at 07:03 PM. Reason: doubled up
Talkwrench is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
Old 06-16-2019, 07:02 PM   #43
Talkwrench
Senior Member
 
Talkwrench's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 2,687
Default Re: 1936 LB marking

[QUOTE=Talkwrench;1768333]"Beings we're talking about LB blocks - what is the current situation as far as finding bearings for them? Are there any current manufacturer's, or is it a situation of having to find NOS stuff? Are there issues as far as certain sizes being unobtainium?"

Finding flanged bearings are getting much harder. Mains not too bad ..
----------
__________________
"Came too close to dying to stop living now!"
Talkwrench is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2019, 12:20 PM   #44
deuce lover
Senior Member
 
deuce lover's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Southern France
Posts: 5,307
Default Re: 1936 LB marking

Last yr I got the mains from C&G($187),the rods off EBAY.I needed .030 over was the issue On the rods and I had to settle for -.030 and +010 ($147.50 the set) .Some sellers want nearly $500 for the rod bearings.The rod bearings are the hard ones to find-at least for me.Reds is another source.Chuck Kuntz on here is another source.

Last edited by deuce lover; 06-17-2019 at 12:29 PM.
deuce lover is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:22 PM.