|
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
05-04-2020, 03:44 PM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: East Coast in CT
Posts: 1,529
|
1932 shock absorber question
On my sons original Deuce Tudor were looking at the stock 32 shocks and are wondering what is the part that look like a bolt with a nut located behind it located in the center of the shocks shaft. Is this an adjustment of some type?
__________________
I use the F word a lot no not that word these words Flathead , Focus and Finish. "Life Member of the Bonneville 200 MPH Club using a Ford Flathead block" Owner , Builder, Driver of the First Ford Flathead bodied roadster to run 200 MPH Record July 13, 2018 LTA timing association 200.921 in one and a half miles burning gasoline. First ever gas burning Ford flathead powered roadster to run 200 MPH at Bonneville Salt Flats setting the record August 7th 2021 at 205.744 MPH |
05-04-2020, 04:40 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: on the Littlefield
Posts: 6,159
|
Re: 1932 shock absorber question
Yes, adjustment,
|
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
05-04-2020, 06:12 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: East Coast in CT
Posts: 1,529
|
Re: 1932 shock absorber question
__________________
I use the F word a lot no not that word these words Flathead , Focus and Finish. "Life Member of the Bonneville 200 MPH Club using a Ford Flathead block" Owner , Builder, Driver of the First Ford Flathead bodied roadster to run 200 MPH Record July 13, 2018 LTA timing association 200.921 in one and a half miles burning gasoline. First ever gas burning Ford flathead powered roadster to run 200 MPH at Bonneville Salt Flats setting the record August 7th 2021 at 205.744 MPH |
05-04-2020, 07:05 PM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: southeastern Michigan
Posts: 10,101
|
Re: 1932 shock absorber question
They were originally designed to be temperature sensitive and there was/is a bi-metal core beneath that oblong threaded plug on the end of the shaft. That core adjusted the size of the internal orifices to better match them to the viscosity of the fluid at any given ambient temperature. They could be fine tuned by adjusting the core.
Many a re-buildable '32-'34 shock with that feature has been destroyed by improper removal of the bi-metal core. |
05-04-2020, 07:08 PM | #5 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: East Coast in CT
Posts: 1,529
|
Re: 1932 shock absorber question
Quote:
Thanks David very interesting.
__________________
I use the F word a lot no not that word these words Flathead , Focus and Finish. "Life Member of the Bonneville 200 MPH Club using a Ford Flathead block" Owner , Builder, Driver of the First Ford Flathead bodied roadster to run 200 MPH Record July 13, 2018 LTA timing association 200.921 in one and a half miles burning gasoline. First ever gas burning Ford flathead powered roadster to run 200 MPH at Bonneville Salt Flats setting the record August 7th 2021 at 205.744 MPH |
|
05-05-2020, 08:41 AM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: on the Littlefield
Posts: 6,159
|
Re: 1932 shock absorber question
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
|
05-05-2020, 12:51 PM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: southeastern Michigan
Posts: 10,101
|
Re: 1932 shock absorber question
Kurt,
On rereading #! or more accurately thinking about what I had read, you're right, it does sound like the externally-adjustable type of shock and not the thermostatically-controlled version. Ford initially released both types of shocks for the '32s with the former intended to be used on four-cylinder chassis and the latter on V8 chassis. That lineup changed shortly after Job #1 and the externally-adjustable type was designated as obsolete with the remaining inventory to be used up on commercial chassis. As a result, the externally-adjustable version of the '32 shock absorber is rarely encountered today. Often it is confused with Model A shock absorbers, but the '32 version (on the left in the photo below) is unique by virtue of its higher fluid capacity reflected by its 1/4" greater height plus the unique-to-'32 casting pattern on the back of the shock. The other photo is of a '32 thermostatically-controlled shock and it was the type I was referring in my earlier post (#4). |
05-05-2020, 02:28 PM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: East Coast in CT
Posts: 1,529
|
Re: 1932 shock absorber question
The 32 Tudor is an early four cylinder model and the shocks look exactly like the one on the left in Davids picture with the external 1/2" hex adjuster. Never looked under my original buried under lots of stuff four cylinder 32 pickup to see what the shocks look like now i will. Once again David your knowledge is amazing i really appreciate the time you take helping us understand what we have or don't have.
Ronnieroadster
__________________
I use the F word a lot no not that word these words Flathead , Focus and Finish. "Life Member of the Bonneville 200 MPH Club using a Ford Flathead block" Owner , Builder, Driver of the First Ford Flathead bodied roadster to run 200 MPH Record July 13, 2018 LTA timing association 200.921 in one and a half miles burning gasoline. First ever gas burning Ford flathead powered roadster to run 200 MPH at Bonneville Salt Flats setting the record August 7th 2021 at 205.744 MPH |
05-05-2020, 03:04 PM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 4,484
|
Re: 1932 shock absorber question
I wonder if the new lever shocks made by Stipes MCI have the same internal features as the originals?
|
05-06-2020, 09:54 AM | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: new britain,ct 06052
Posts: 9,390
|
Re: 1932 shock absorber question
I believe the Stipe shocks are Model A only...................
Paul in CT |
05-06-2020, 10:25 AM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: on the Littlefield
Posts: 6,159
|
Re: 1932 shock absorber question
later parts books list 28-32 as all the same
the stipe shocks may differ in manufacturing details, but not damping function |
05-06-2020, 10:55 AM | #12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: southeastern Michigan
Posts: 10,101
|
Re: 1932 shock absorber question
Increased capacity is not a "manufacturing detail". Model A shocks will fit a '32 chassis, but not function as well as the originals given the increased weight of a '32 compared to a Model A, model to model. When the design of a part is changed, there is always a good reason for the change.
|
05-06-2020, 11:13 AM | #13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 4,484
|
Re: 1932 shock absorber question
I used the Stipes shocks on the front of a chassis I built for a 32 lakester that was finished by Dale Grau in Minn. Be interesting to know how they work when he gets the car on the road this summer.
|
|
|
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|