|
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
04-30-2016, 04:13 PM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: langley, wa.
Posts: 642
|
Multi-viscosity oil in transmission
Is 95/140 oil ok to use in transmission?
|
04-30-2016, 07:28 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Camino, CA.
Posts: 3,086
|
Re: Multi-viscosity oil in transmission
I'd stick with just the 140. The so called 600W is really 140W.
|
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
04-30-2016, 07:51 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: oroville calif
Posts: 893
|
Re: Multi-viscosity oil in transmission
yes for summer, but 85-90 is best in winter, the heaver gear oil in cold weather makes he trans stiffer and harder to change gears
|
04-30-2016, 08:02 PM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 438
|
Re: Multi-viscosity oil in transmission
Try it. If you don't like it, you can always drain and fill with something else. I dislike that with 600wt it will shift different between cold and warmed up.
|
04-30-2016, 10:50 PM | #5 |
Senior Member
|
Re: Multi-viscosity oil in transmission
The 600W is a brand name not a viscosity. Yes it is confusing.
__________________
What's right about America is that although we have a mess of problems, we have great capacity - intellect and resources - to do some thing about them. - Henry Ford II |
05-01-2016, 06:12 AM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 714
|
Re: Multi-viscosity oil in transmission
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
|
05-01-2016, 07:19 AM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NC
Posts: 2,975
|
Re: Multi-viscosity oil in transmission
|
05-01-2016, 07:49 AM | #8 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: South East NJ
Posts: 3,398
|
Re: Multi-viscosity oil in transmission
Quote:
Here is what was researched out in the past: Posted by Marco Tahtaras from c-24-4-43-195.hsd1.ca.comcast.net (24.4.43.195) on Saturday, August 09, 2008 at 9:38AM : In Reply to: Mobile 636 gear oil posted by Bob from ? (64.237.121.113) on Friday, August 08, 2008 at 10:35PM : Mobil: Mobilgear 636 (Which has been replaced with MOBILGEAR 600xp 680 11/27/2011) BP: Energol GR-XP 680 Castrol: Castrol Alpha LS680 Shell: Omala 680 Texaco: Meropa 680 Here is some more info Re: 600W Thickness -- One (1) Answer Read Follow Ups Post Follow Up Model-A Ford Message Board FAQ Posted by H. L. Chauvin on Nov. 26, 2011 at 16:34:03 In Reply to: Re: 600W Thickness, Transmission Gear Grinding posted by louis on Nov. 25, 2011 at 17:19:35 Hi Louis, Your former question made sense when someone new to this Forum reads "all" of the many "different" former 600W discussions in the attached archives. It appears most "salespersons", (parts suppliers & oil compaies), offer the 1930's 600W substitute, but as Marco noted in the archives in the late 1990's, they are "not" all the same. Many articles appear on experiences of switching to thicker transmission oil; thus eliminating driver's not experiencing grinding of transmission gears. Gear oil thickness, (resistance to flow), is measured by several methods. Kinematic Viscosity per ASTM D445 is one standard method indicating the milimeters squared divided by time in seconds at 40 degrees C, or 104 degrees F, which is closest to trasmission gear oil viscosity after attaining operating temperature. For example, per ASTM 445, water has low viscosity, honey has high viscosity. The recommended BP Energol 680, Shell Omala 680, Mobile Extra Helca Super Cylider Oil 680, have ASTM 445 measured viscosities, (40 C), of a high 680; Texaco Mepora 680 indicates a thinner 646; however, Valvoline 85/140W drops down to 395, & Castrol 85/140W is thiner at 369. One of the "most" scientific test conducted on Ford's 1930 recommended 600W appears to be a gentleman who wrote that he had an old sealed can of Ford's recommended 600W. After trying many gear oil substitutes, his highly scientific lab test indicated that the 600W was extremely thick, almost like melted tar, & equal to the above mentioned 680 viscosities. His test, he dipped his finger in each & watched it flow! It appears if one uses recommended gear oil with a viscosity of 680, & gears continue to grind, begin looking somewhere else. Hope this helps 1930's future 600W research. |
|
05-01-2016, 07:51 AM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 1,868
|
Re: Multi-viscosity oil in transmission
600w oil is probably closer to sae 240w. I find shifting is better in warm weather with the original weight oil.
|
05-01-2016, 11:44 AM | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Westminster, SC
Posts: 188
|
Re: Multi-viscosity oil in transmission
Not to mention, today's gear oil, the #5 that most lubes cover, will eat up brass in the trans. My Ural sidecar bike has straight cut gears, like the model A, and that is where I read about the #5 type.
|
05-01-2016, 05:08 PM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 1,868
|
Re: Multi-viscosity oil in transmission
Shell Omala S2 G 680 is one of the Ford 600w equivalents
|
05-01-2016, 08:42 PM | #12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Central Texas
Posts: 113
|
Re: Multi-viscosity oil in transmission
So using the Shell in the example above, who carries this stuff. Also should we use this in our steering gear box and the rear end, since 600w is recommended for those also.
|
05-01-2016, 09:41 PM | #13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Mpls, MN
Posts: 27,582
|
Re: Multi-viscosity oil in transmission
I found the heavy gear oil at my local Mobil bulk oil dealer listed in the yellow pages.
Yes, use it in all 3 places. |
05-02-2016, 09:58 AM | #14 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Largo Florida
Posts: 7,225
|
Re: Multi-viscosity oil in transmission
I think it will certainly work better than some of the concoctions folks come up with, which I can't/won't recommend. Straight 140 will work fine in cooler weather. We used it for years in all weather before we knew any better. Straight 250 will work fine in warm weather. If it can't be found locally, Lubriplate will have it. 600W is actually in the 200-250 range. |
05-02-2016, 10:23 AM | #15 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Camarillo, CA and Pine Grove, CA
Posts: 2,835
|
Re: Multi-viscosity oil in transmission
If you have ever cracked open a trans or rear end that still had the original Ford Fudge in it you would immediately recoil from the pungent odor. That odor was from the whale oil that was part of the original Ford formula.
__________________
1921 Runabout 1930 Tudor Early 1930 AA Speed costs money. How fast do you want to go? |
05-02-2016, 10:44 AM | #16 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Central, IL
Posts: 3,968
|
Re: Multi-viscosity oil in transmission
smell always reminded me of purple childrens cough medicine...yea that "ford fudge" is exactly that - gets on your skin and you stink like it for a few days, doesnt wash off with anything either... WD-40 ive found works the best but then you smell like WD-40 haha..
__________________
1929 Model AA - Need long splash aprons! |
|
|
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|