|
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
02-19-2011, 12:54 PM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 1,369
|
No Powerhouse gen. bracket?
So, the generator is held in place by just the big bolt through the bottom? I have seen braces that run off a front cover bolt, but those are after-market, right? Seems like Henry and the gang would have thought of something to keep that belt tight.
|
02-19-2011, 01:00 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Lakeville, MN
Posts: 5,165
|
Re: No Powerhouse gen. bracket?
I am pretty sure the first powerhouse generators had a bracket bolted to the generator to attach a long thin bracket to a special bolt in the timing cover. The later powerhouses I believe, just relied on the large bolt in the bottom.
|
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
02-19-2011, 01:04 PM | #3 |
BANNED
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Walla Walla, Washington USA
Posts: 6,066
|
Re: No Powerhouse gen. bracket?
Tom Wesenberg may have some information on this aspect as I think there was a thread about it at one time if my memory is not failing me...Tom?
Pluck |
02-19-2011, 01:05 PM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Detroit
Posts: 288
|
Re: No Powerhouse gen. bracket?
The adjusting arm was used through October of 1928, and mounted to the front of the timing cover using the "special" bolt.
__________________
"Son, there are two ways to do this, your way and the right way." Thanks dad. Looking for a copy or reprint of 1932 A.E.A. Universal Catalog of Genuine Electrical Service Parts
|
02-19-2011, 01:08 PM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: "Live Free or Die!"
Posts: 510
|
Re: No Powerhouse gen. bracket?
Greg from start of production through 10/28, there were two versions of the powerhouse, the first had a short "U" bracket, the second a single arm bracket attached to the front. Both styles used an adjusting arm, first a short one on the first version and a longer one on the second. The specs are in Chapter 2 of the JS. After October, the mount was the same on the third version but the adjusting arm was eliminated. It seems like it should have been kept. If you have the third type and you have a driver, I would recommend installing the long arm per version 2. These brackets that you see are not aftermarket, just not originally installed on version 3 from 10/28 to mid-29.
__________________
"A wet bird doesn't fly at night." |
02-19-2011, 01:16 PM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 798
|
Re: No Powerhouse gen. bracket?
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
came along as well to accomodate this need-----including brackets for use on alternators. I would hate to drive on some of the "washboard" roads of "yesteryear" without a support bracket, JMHO. Jack
__________________
Cincinnati, Ohio |
02-19-2011, 04:09 PM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Mpls, MN
Posts: 27,582
|
Re: No Powerhouse gen. bracket?
I've seen factory photos from November 1928 assembly lines showing the powerhouse with a tension bracket. That would be about the end of them, as they aren't needed.
I'm driving my 28 Phaeton with a temporary engine and 3 brush powerhouse with no bracket. It hasn't come loose in 5 years af driving. The belt doesn't have to be very tight, and I have mine loose enough to easily push and pull at least an inch midway from the water pump to the generator. Last edited by Tom Wesenberg; 02-19-2011 at 04:18 PM. |
02-19-2011, 04:43 PM | #8 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Windy City
Posts: 2,919
|
Re: No Powerhouse gen. bracket?
Quote:
|
|
02-19-2011, 05:25 PM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Jackson Michigan
Posts: 245
|
Re: No Powerhouse gen. bracket?
If you run it to tight it will take the water pump bearing out. it is just a generator not an alternator so it does not have to be that tight....just my 3 cents worth.
|
|
|
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|