Reliability of Early V8 and Highway Driving

[alan_d]

[I hope this is the right place]

I'm interested in and trying to pinpoint what Truck I want to look for. I want one to use, not as my main truck, but as a 2nd truck of such. I want something I can use like a truck, and have lusted for a AA since seeing one a number of years ago. I won't be using it all the time, but I would want to haul lumber/timber and similar cargo with it, using it in the capacity of a flatbed as I use now. My current flatbed is a '97 with a 460 V8, so it's much larger capacity. I don't use my current flatbed to it's limit, so I'm pretty sure the AA/BB would suit me fine power wise. Like all things in life, more power is always welcome on old cars/trucks.

In trying to narrow this search down (no rush on my part), I come to the biggest difference between the AA and BB, that being the engine. Although there are other minor differences, this is the main one.

The simplicity of the 4 cylinder in the AA (and some BBs) seems to be a huge advantage. I do understand the V8 is a slightly more complicated motor, are they as reliable? Is more work often required on them to rebuild? The V8 was huge in Ford being able to turn around the company, and mostly because of the power and speed that most people desired.

In terms of power, the V8 has almost twice the HP, and speed is greatly improved, so I'm tending to lean towards a BB with the V8 in it as it seems better for any type of freeway driving. Another person implied these AA/BB trucks were not designed to run on the freeway, but there are people driving them all over youtube and other places.

Can some of you more knowledgeable folks who are more familiar with both of these engines offer some advice and/or the reliability of the early flathead V8 used in the BB trucks? Possibly a comparison between them and/or how you see both engines. I would appreciate it.

I understand that these are kind of like Apples and Oranges, and why I'm leaning towards the BB with the early V8 in it. There seem to be a LOT less of them though, and I suspect it's because Ford was having such a difficult time meeting the demands of the new V8 cars for a number of years. The V8 was instrumental in saving their company...I guess I'm getting a soft spot for that early V8.

Alan

[Charlie Stephens]

I think a BB with an original V8 engine would be a very rare vehicle, most of them were 4 cylinder.

What year(s) are you considering?

Note that if you insure the vehicle as an antique you might have a clause in the policy that prohibits using it to haul lumber.

Charlie Stephens

[alan_d]

Originally Posted by Charlie Stephens

I think a BB with an original V8 engine would be a very rare vehicle, most of them were 4 cylinder.

What year(s) are you considering?

Well, you don't get a lot of choice on years, but it seems twice as good as original Ford colors...LOL One just sold on ebay for $7500, it was a '34, and there's a '33 not too far from me without the bed, but has all the front cab/fender/rocker panels and V8. And it runs, so said.

I've *READ* that they were also made in '35, but have never seen any on the web in my searches. And in theory you may be able to find them in '32, but it seems the early BBs had the 4 cylinder engine.

I think the answer to your question is '33 or '34.

Originally Posted by Charlie Stephens

Note that if you insure the vehicle as an antique you might have a clause in the policy that prohibits using it to haul lumber.

Not within it's weight limitations? What is considered "hauling lumber" I wonder? If I go fetch a tree down the road that feel in a storm, the insurance won't cover me? I'm sure they could add that on, within the weight limits of the vehicle, even if excluded. Also, I could just get liability on the truck, that's what I do with most of my cars...

Alan

[alan_d]

Originally Posted by alan_d

I think the answer to your question is '33 or '34.

I take that back so soon...here's what appears to be a BB on ebay that says it's a '35.

https://www.ebay.com/itm/1935-Ford-O...l/263478157920

I typically search for 1928 - 1935, since 1928 is pretty much when the AA started production.

Alan

[mrtexas]

You realize with the gearing available probably no more than 25mph due to very tall rear end gears? 5.11-7.25

http://aafords.com/aa-chassis/aa-4000-rear-axle/

[alan_d]

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)

Originally Posted by mrtexas

You realize with the gearing available probably no more than 25mph due to very tall rear end gears?

Is that true of the models with the 2-speed transmission also?

I've seen people saying they get 40mph comfortably on the AA.

I was hoping the V8 would get better speed, say 50-55mph.

The cars were rated much higher I thought and would do about 70-80mph, maybe I'm wrong. I would expect the flatbed to be slower, this is kind of true in general, but 25mph seems a bit conservative...

Could still work for what I want it for, as it won't see freeway per se, it will see some 50mph highways possibly...the immediate roads around my property are all 30 mph AFAIK. My street definitely is. To get to a market I would need to go about 5 miles down the road. Speed limit is 45mph possibly, but it gets out to the Highway that is definitely 50-55mph. Still, could work in that environment. I could drive slower on the 50mph Highway, not an issue. But to get around the lake would require some roads up to 50-55mph. I don't have a house on it now, so no worries. That is where I would end up keeping the AA/BB. I was hoping to be able to fetch trees that be within the 3000 lb. payload.

I need to do more research, hard to find too much on the BB. Not a lot of them, but a nice one just sold on ebay for $7500, with a V8. I know of one not too far from me, no bed, needs some work but runs which I've been thinking about...

Alan

[Bored&Stroked]

The one you listed on eBay is a REALLY nice truck . . . no idea what it will go for, but my guess is quite a bit more than the $7900 it is listed at now. These body/cab styles are very popular and even though it is a big stake-bed truck, somebody could take that whole body and build a 1/2 ton type truck out of it - so it holds a lot of value.

If you could get one in this sort of shape, you'd have an immediate and well sorted out truck to put to use tomorrow - to me that is a big benefit. I'd sure check into it a bit more! (Note, it has a later flathead - and that is probably not a bad thing).

[cas3]

i think the brakes are bigger too on the later models than you will find on a AA

[KDL]

Wouldn't the ebay listing be a model 51?
I'd say top speed would be in the 40 MPH range.

[GB SISSON]

The 1 1/2 ton V8 trucks were called BB's for quite a few years, unlike the cars. I have had 3 AAs and a 32 BB and a 34 BB. I also had a 37 and currently have a 47 2 ton. Everything after the AAs were V8s. My first AA in 1972 had the usual worm drive rear end. 26 mph on the flat with the pedal on the floor. (I was 19). The next AA I was 45 and that had the rare 'high geared ' rear axle. It would do 40, quite handily. My last AA had the Warford 2 speed aux transmission with foot operated pedal. It was more like 'slow, and slower, meaning the split was for more capacity. Somewhere around 50 yrs old I bought a 40 1 1/2 ton. I loved the hydraulic brakes when loaded. At 64 I have settled into the 47 2 ton with 2 speed rear axle (also slow and slower) and HYDRAULIC brakes. This truck does 45 all day, not that I do. I love the V8s. The last pic is my '47 2 ton 59ab V8. They get under your skin, into your soul and you will never be the same. What ever way you go, you will be driving a totally outdated and very wild ride. I hope you are ready for it! It is a blast

[JSeery]

Speed is not going to be much different between a V8 and a 4, the rear axle gear ratio is going to be the biggest factor. The gearing can be changed, but the gearing is going to dictate the speed range. I'm not very knowledgeable on the trucks in these years, if they came from the factory with different gear ratios based on engine type, then that would be a factor to consider.

[alan_d]

Thanks for all of your input, appreciated. So it seems that there is little difference in the AA and BB and rear end would dictate ultimate speed.

Probably a sacrilege question, but can the gears be changed to get a little more speed out the 'ol gals, or is that not advisable?

Also, do any of you know if the BB came with a synchronized transmission, or was it the same as on the AA?

Seems they put a different transmission on the V8, so I wasn't sure about that either as they transitioned over to synchro somewhere in the 30s it would seem.

Alan

[JSeery]

I think they are all "crash box" transmissions (no synchros). If you haven't driven one you will find it interesting.

[drolston]

My brother restored my grandfathers 32 Ford stake body farm truck. It had the four cylinder. Right or wrong, we always referred to it as a Model B. When my granddad hauled a load of firewood from the farm to the cabin, he had to back up the big hill, because reverse was lower than low. Or maybe because the gravity gas flow worked better that direction. It would get to 40 mph on level ground. He got a much stronger International truck in 1949, but used the Ford regularly until he died. It got overhauled about every ten years and finally ran out of cylinder wall. My brother had to replace the engine, but it drives like new now.

My brother can shift without crashing the gears; I have not mastered that art. Even so, it is a joy to drive such a purely functional workhorse with so much family history.

[GB SISSON]

I think synchos came out in 1953. I had a '53 f350 pickup with synchro, but by then I was totally used to the crash box so I double clutched anyways. I still do in my '92 with the ZF 5 speed. Not sure why. It's in my soul.... Oh and your post was about reliability. Personally I have found the V8s far more reliable. The reason could be that by the time I got to the V8s I had more money and more knowledge, therefore I bought rebuilt stuff in advance, before I was stranded beside the road.

[alan_d]

GB

Thanks for the great info, I think I need to step back and re-think this. I had been looking at the early 40s pickups, and that might be something for me to think about, but I'm starting to think that I might be better off just staying with my current '97 F-Super Duty flatbed, and instead look for a 1/2-ton pickup with a V8 to replace the Tacoma I currently drive. It has a 1/2-ton cargo...

The speed could be a deal breaker for me.

What about moving into the late 30s, I saw a truck that was a '38-'39 flatbed, obviously that has the V8, but are they are faster than the AAs/BBs?

I know that there were 1/2-ton pickups from 32 on, are those any quicker than the AAs?

Going into the 50s, the trucks got pretty big, as did the engines. Looking for something with less fuel appetite.

BTW, you seems to do some logging yourself, I don't do too much but want to be able to fetch trees to turn into lumber.

Alan

[Brendan]

Originally Posted by alan_d

GB

Thanks for the great info, I think I need to step back and re-think this. I had been looking at the early 40s pickups, and that might be something for me to think about, but I'm starting to think that I might be better off just staying with my current '97 F-Super Duty flatbed, and instead look for a 1/2-ton pickup with a V8 to replace the Tacoma I currently drive. It has a 1/2-ton cargo...

The speed could be a deal breaker for me.

What about moving into the late 30s, I saw a truck that was a '38-'39 flatbed, obviously that has the V8, but are they are faster than the AAs/BBs?

I know that there were 1/2-ton pickups from 32 on, are those any quicker than the AAs?

Going into the 50s, the trucks got pretty big, as did the engines. Looking for something with less fuel appetite.

BTW, you seems to do some logging yourself, I don't do too much but want to be able to fetch trees to turn into lumber.

Alan

i have a 36 pickup, all pickups back then where 1/2 ton and then you had a Big Truck as i call them. they are 1 1/2 ton. i cant drive my 36 every day. it has a 411 rear in it with 7;50 16 tires. it will do 50 mph all day long. as far as fuel mileage, don't think about it , just put gas in it. my pickup gets about 10 mpg around town and a little more on the back roads. the brakes on it are all stock, mechanical. i will not drive on the freeway around hear, Santa Rosa, because the way people drive around

[51504bat]

I've had a couple of '40 1 1/2 ton big trucks.One I tried to use as a daily driver. It had an 8ba and a 3 speed Watson O/D auxiliary box with 19.5 tubeless radials and it beat me to death without a load. Also it was just too big for around town. I sold it and bought the '39 p/u I have now. That said if you still want a big truck consider brakes over speed. Hydraulic brakes came out in '39 and IMO that's the only way to go.

[alan_d]

Originally Posted by Brendan

i have a 36 pickup, all pickups back then where 1/2 ton and then you had a Big Truck as i call them. they are 1 1/2 ton. i cant drive my 36 every day. it has a 411 rear in it with 7;50 16 tires. it will do 50 mph all day long. as far as fuel mileage, don't think about it , just put gas in it. my pickup gets about 10 mpg around town and a little more on the back roads. the brakes on it are all stock, mechanical. i will not drive on the freeway around hear, Santa Rosa, because the way people drive around

Brendan,

Ditto on the way people drive up there, when I come back from Lake County over 175, as I approach Santa Rosa the traffic is always backed up, but the people drive like maniacs jumping in front of me...I detest that type of driving...maybe it's just my bad timing...I see it by where I live also...people think they deserve to be first.

What size V8 do you have? Seems the '39 I posted above has an 85HP V8. I was curious if that was newer than was in your '36 and for extra credit is that bigger than the V8 that was in the BB? I'm trying to figure out if this is what I hear people refer to as the "later engine" for the Early V8, if that makes sense. Was the difference in HP? Seems the BB was 75HP, but that's by memory. The AA was 40HP and I think the BB was almost twice. Maybe this '39 with an 85HP is a bit more capable?

I guess I'm fishing for a dually...LOL

Alan

[cmbrucew]

Originally Posted by drolston

My brother restored my grandfathers 32 Ford stake body farm truck. It had the four cylinder. Right or wrong, we always referred to it as a Model B. When my granddad hauled a load of firewood from the farm to the cabin, he had to back up the big hill, because reverse was lower than low. Or maybe because the gravity gas flow worked better that direction. It would get to 40 mph on level ground. He got a much stronger International truck in 1949, but used the Ford regularly until he died. It got overhauled about every ten years and finally ran out of cylinder wall. My brother had to replace the engine, but it drives like new now.

My brother can shift without crashing the gears; I have not mastered that art. Even so, it is a joy to drive such a purely functional workhorse with so much family history.

Drolston
You show a VA. address, but this picture looks like the high desert.
Just asking
Bruce