Go Back   The Ford Barn > General Discussion > Early V8 (1932-53)

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-18-2016, 02:04 PM   #21
V8COOPMAN
Senior Member
 
V8COOPMAN's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: East Shore of LAKE HOUSTON
Posts: 11,115
Default Re: Pros and cons of Lincoln flatheads

Quote:
Originally Posted by Henry Floored View Post
The 337 Lincolns were raced in '50 and '51. While they didn't win overall they ran very competitively with the new OHV Gm V8's most notably the Olds 88.
Those Olds V8s were ONLY 303 CU IN. DD
__________________
Click Links Below __


'35-'36 W/8BA & MECHANICAL FAN


T5 W/TORQUE TUBE
V8COOPMAN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2016, 02:15 PM   #22
Jason in TX
Senior Member
 
Jason in TX's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: ⓉⒺXⒶⓈ
Posts: 2,047
Default Re: Pros and cons of Lincoln flatheads

The Conforth Lincoln racer was the car to beat at TROG. Fast as lightning.


__________________
--------------
Drive it like you know how to fix it!
DMAFC / OILERS CC-MC
Jason in TX is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
Old 12-18-2016, 04:27 PM   #23
Newc
Senior Member
 
Newc's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 2,489
Default Re: Pros and cons of Lincoln flatheads

Hi Ken Austin developed the Lincoln parts in the '50s, and sold the product line to H&H. It's all good stuff for your Hot Rod Lincoln. Those 337's are cheap to purchase to get started. Newc
Newc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2016, 05:35 PM   #24
V8COOPMAN
Senior Member
 
V8COOPMAN's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: East Shore of LAKE HOUSTON
Posts: 11,115
Default Re: Pros and cons of Lincoln flatheads

Ready to get serious! DD

__________________
Click Links Below __


'35-'36 W/8BA & MECHANICAL FAN


T5 W/TORQUE TUBE
V8COOPMAN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2016, 07:26 PM   #25
Henry Floored
Senior Member
 
Henry Floored's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Florida
Posts: 583
Default Re: Pros and cons of Lincoln flatheads

Quote:
Originally Posted by V8COOPMAN View Post
Those Olds V8s were ONLY 303 CU IN. DD
Don't know what to make of this. The Hudson Hornets used to give 'em fits.
Henry Floored is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2016, 07:31 PM   #26
Henry Floored
Senior Member
 
Henry Floored's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Florida
Posts: 583
Default Re: Pros and cons of Lincoln flatheads

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jason in TX View Post
The Conforth Lincoln racer was the car to beat at TROG. Fast as lightning.


Very cool. So I take it this car did well against the tough Chevy six powered Chev roadster? Not sure of the fellow's name.
Henry Floored is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2016, 08:36 PM   #27
skidmarks
Senior Member
 
skidmarks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: newark, delaware
Posts: 3,735
Default Re: Pros and cons of Lincoln flatheads

Quote:
Originally Posted by Henry Floored View Post
Don't know what to make of this. The Hudson Hornets used to give 'em fits.
49 to 53 were 303 ci. 54 it went to 324
skidmarks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2016, 10:56 PM   #28
jagnweiner
Senior Member
 
jagnweiner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Geneseo, IL
Posts: 290
Default Re: Pros and cons of Lincoln flatheads

Quote:
Originally Posted by V8COOPMAN View Post
Ready to get serious! DD

Does anyone else see the irony of all those lightening holes in that axle holding up that heavy Lincoln mill?
__________________
Regards,
Scott

'47 Mercury Convertible
'25 Dodge Bros. Touring Car
'63 MG Midget
jagnweiner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2016, 11:12 PM   #29
drfrankenklein
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Bensenville Illinois
Posts: 32
Default Re: Pros and cons of Lincoln flatheads

This guy is smoking some good stuff wanting $800 for a 2x2 intake! LoL! The guy he gotten the molds from originally had these for $300.00... Look around you find parts and some speed parts for the 337's....
drfrankenklein is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2016, 06:54 AM   #30
Henry Floored
Senior Member
 
Henry Floored's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Florida
Posts: 583
Default Re: Pros and cons of Lincoln flatheads

Quote:
Originally Posted by jagnweiner View Post
Does anyone else see the irony of all those lightening holes in that axle holding up that heavy Lincoln mill?
That's an effort to reduce "unsprung" weight. This would help the axle react to bumps on the road easier as an example.
Henry Floored is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2016, 07:10 AM   #31
Walt Dupont--Me.
Senior Member
 
Walt Dupont--Me.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Gardiner Me.
Posts: 4,200
Default Re: Pros and cons of Lincoln flatheads

Quote:
Originally Posted by skidmarks View Post
49 to 53 were 303 ci. 54 it went to 324
Then they went to 370, I worked for the Olds - Cad Co. in 57 to 60. Walt
Walt Dupont--Me. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2016, 08:20 AM   #32
Henry Floored
Senior Member
 
Henry Floored's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Florida
Posts: 583
Default Re: Pros and cons of Lincoln flatheads

Quote:
Originally Posted by Walt Dupont--Me. View Post
Then they went to 370, I worked for the Olds - Cad Co. in 57 to 60. Walt
Walt I mean this with all due respect either OHV Ford engines were actually terrible or they they had an undeserved terrible reputation during the 50's because it appears to me that hot rodders would convert to any brand OHV except for Ford.

This has bothered me my whole life. Seems like a shame that Ford let their reputation as a V8 company go to hell after the Flathead era.

It is kind of an ironic twist that for two years straight a Ford Y-block has taken top honors in the "vintage engine" class at the Amsoil Engine Masters competition. The class is only two years old.

Now the winners were pretty well built Y-blocks obviously created by two different true "engine masters", but there were also solid performances by less aggressive combinations and even a surprise result from a 368 Lincoln and a 430 MEL.

What was wrong with OHV Fords in the 1950's?
Henry Floored is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2016, 08:23 AM   #33
Henry Floored
Senior Member
 
Henry Floored's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Florida
Posts: 583
Default Re: Pros and cons of Lincoln flatheads

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jason in TX View Post
The Conforth Lincoln racer was the car to beat at TROG. Fast as lightning.


Someone forgot to tell this guy that the 337 Lincoln sucks and is too heavy.
Henry Floored is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2016, 08:29 AM   #34
Ol' Ron
Senior Member
 
Ol' Ron's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Chester Vt
Posts: 8,864
Default Re: Pros and cons of Lincoln flatheads

I'd love to hear a V12 Lincoln with an L-100 cam.
Ol' Ron is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2016, 08:49 AM   #35
big job
Senior Member
 
big job's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Dighton, Mass
Posts: 1,230
Default Re: Pros and cons of Lincoln flatheads

Whats wrong with early Y blocks. Answer = junk oil, lack of oil changing. I remember
those so sledged up when they were only 4-5yrs old. Sad as it is, many back then
poured #90 gear oil in them. On or about 1964 the PVC valve came in, big improvement. I look back and people did stupid things back then - putting saw dust
in rear axles corn and pepper in radiators molasses in the crankcase. oh well thats
what was done. I have 4 big Y blocks 332's clean no problem at all. They really have
more power than my 460 injected 'dog' in a late F350. So now If one has a $30,000
vehicle would you do those things to your engine? NO
big job is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2016, 09:00 AM   #36
big job
Senior Member
 
big job's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Dighton, Mass
Posts: 1,230
Default Re: Pros and cons of Lincoln flatheads

We have 3, 337's in stock of which one has 12,000 miles. My above reply on the
460 'dog' I have been working time to time milling an adapter plate 337 to AOD
4x4. Thinking re drilling 460 to 337 flex plate keeping starter housing. Why, can't
deal with 3mpg down hill 460 fuel injected junk. Yes gone back to dealer with no avail.
Snow Sat plowed & got 4 hrs, tank of gas. thats not acceptable.. Meanwhile a F6
sander runs all night and use couple three gallons
big job is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2016, 09:41 AM   #37
rotorwrench
Senior Member
 
rotorwrench's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 16,442
Default Re: Pros and cons of Lincoln flatheads

FoMoCo came out with the FE block in the late 50s but it didn't really come alive until the 390 cid was developed. That was one of Ford's "light bulb on" better ideas. The Y-blocks were good torque engines and could be built to be even better but the later 390 FE block was good right out of the box.
rotorwrench is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2016, 05:00 PM   #38
cretin
Senior Member
 
cretin's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: S.F.V. Cali.
Posts: 133
Default Re: Pros and cons of Lincoln flatheads

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ol' Ron View Post
I'd love to hear a V12 Lincoln with an L-100 cam.
The '36 roadster we built recently has a Lincoln V-12, and before going to GNRS we didn't have the chance to get mufflers on it, so it was just straight piped.
I loved how it sounded, it sounded like an airplane.
However, I don't know what cam is in it. Are there performance cams available for it?

Hearing that engine really solidified my want to do a lakester with a Lincoln V-12 in it.
cretin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2016, 06:04 PM   #39
Tim Ayers
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NJ
Posts: 6,186
Default Re: Pros and cons of Lincoln flatheads

Quote:
Originally Posted by Henry Floored View Post
Walt I mean this with all due respect either OHV Ford engines were actually terrible or they they had an undeserved terrible reputation during the 50's because it appears to me that hot rodders would convert to any brand OHV except for Ford.

This has bothered me my whole life. Seems like a shame that Ford let their reputation as a V8 company go to hell after the Flathead era.

It is kind of an ironic twist that for two years straight a Ford Y-block has taken top honors in the "vintage engine" class at the Amsoil Engine Masters competition. The class is only two years old.

Now the winners were pretty well built Y-blocks obviously created by two different true "engine masters", but there were also solid performances by less aggressive combinations and even a surprise result from a 368 Lincoln and a 430 MEL.

What was wrong with OHV Fords in the 1950's?
Well, they were low on HP compared to other engines and as someone said, a little sludge clogged the oil passages to the top end and that would quickly kill the valve train.

I have a Snap-on tool used to forcibly eject the sludge out of the top end oil passages for Y blocks, so it was a known problem.

It really wasn't until the 312 did Ford get their OHV engine worked out. Unfortunately, their reputation preceded them. Plus, weren't they heavy and long compared to other OHV engines?

It's hard to even compare a 283 SBC to any Y block. Shortly after the 283 came out, guys had a lot of tricks to wake up those 283's. Plus, there was a host of A/M support for the Olds and SBC engines, not so much for the Y-block.

Ford's OHV engine was a day late and a dollar short.

I think that about sums it up.

Last edited by Tim Ayers; 12-19-2016 at 06:11 PM.
Tim Ayers is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2016, 12:26 PM   #40
Henry Floored
Senior Member
 
Henry Floored's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Florida
Posts: 583
Default Re: Pros and cons of Lincoln flatheads

I wasn't there but here is a '57 Ford putting some work in. This is a Y-block pure stock drag racer against a 60's muscle car.

https://youtu.be/LS37qHLtVrs
Henry Floored is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:14 AM.