|
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
09-13-2022, 01:40 AM | #21 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Masterton, New Zealand
Posts: 3,834
|
Re: 1934 ford toe in
Quote - "Nick, the 1/16” toe in is per wheel. Total difference between wheels is what you want to be 1/8”."
Is this correct? I always thought the 1/16" was total difference. Although, as my car runs radials I've always set toe in at 1/8" [total], believing radials prefer a bit more toe...perhaps I should increase a bit more from my current 1/8"? Could someone with the experience please advise? Thanks, Brian
__________________
Unfortunately, two half wits don't make a whole wit! |
09-13-2022, 03:52 AM | #22 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Solihull, England.
Posts: 8,755
|
Re: 1934 ford toe in
My belief was that the 1/16" to 1/8" guidelines were across both wheels. I've never heard a figure quoted as per wheel. I'll stick to what I have been doing.
I have some Dunlop gauges that sit against the wheel rim. As long as your wheels are not buckled they will be as good as anything. Mart. |
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
09-19-2022, 02:28 AM | #23 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Manawatu, New Zealand
Posts: 1,416
|
Re: 1934 ford toe in
Ditto-Its what was used in the Day and still works well -Karl
__________________
Such a fine sight to see-Its a Girl, My Lord, in a Flatbed Ford slowin' down to take a look at me. |
|
|
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|