Go Back   The Ford Barn > General Discussion > Model T (1909-1927)

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-27-2015, 10:48 PM   #1
Bruce Compton, Canada
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 416
Default Lowering a T

I'd like to lower the rear end of my T coupe at least 2". Can anyone see a problem by removing a few of the top "short" leaves, as they appear to do very little except add some height and maybe a little stiffness to the rear of the car. I have two reasons for wanting to do this: one is that my wife cannot get in because of the huge 17" first step, and the second is that I'd like to decrease the angle between the rear of the tranny and the driveshaft ( at the U joint) . I've already lowered the front a little by using the '26-27 front spindles but the car still has a definite "rake". Thanks : Bruce
Bruce Compton, Canada is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-2015, 11:19 PM   #2
redmodelt
Senior Member
 
redmodelt's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Portland OR
Posts: 6,342
Default Re: Lowering a T

My T is bouncy enough with the full pack, I don't think you would like the ride with less springs in a coupe and yes they do more then add height. You could carry a small step stool like they use to have for boarding trains or add a rung under the running board. There was a photo just shown on the MTFCA site in the last couple of weeks of a touring with the extra rung. Maybe one of the slide out RV steps could be used under the running board. The "rake" between the rear end and transmission is how the car was designed and unless you have something way different then stock from the transmission back don't see why you would want to change it.
You could also get one of the reverse eye main leafs and see if that would do the job.
https://www.modeltford.com/item/3824RVA.aspx
redmodelt is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
Old 05-28-2015, 12:44 AM   #3
Layden B
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 300
Default Re: Lowering a T

The way it was often done in the era.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg t spring a.JPG (206.3 KB, 41 views)
File Type: jpg t spring b.JPG (192.6 KB, 27 views)
Layden B is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-28-2015, 08:43 AM   #4
BUBBAS IGNITION
Senior Member
 
BUBBAS IGNITION's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: SPEEDWAY INDIANA
Posts: 4,148
Default Re: Lowering a T

I have removed a couple leaves ( top) and reversed the spring eyes on two of my Ts and they rider good and set lower .......
__________________
If it Makes Spark, we do it !!!!
www.bubbasignition.com
[email protected]
BUBBAS IGNITION is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-28-2015, 07:05 PM   #5
Bruce Compton, Canada
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 416
Default Re: Lowering a T

Layden , do they get bent cold or with heat? Bruce
Bruce Compton, Canada is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-28-2015, 07:17 PM   #6
redmodelt
Senior Member
 
redmodelt's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Portland OR
Posts: 6,342
Default Re: Lowering a T

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
Bending them cold or hot it should be re-tempered to hold the bend. Some people get by and have no problems. Same with re-arching springs some get by, while others, the springs just go flat again.
redmodelt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-28-2015, 09:37 PM   #7
Bruce Compton, Canada
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 416
Default Re: Lowering a T

Thanks for the input guys. I'm almost done building a second step from a section of an old running board on parallel links and powered by a '54 Lincoln power seat drive. It works great and will ease the entry problem. I still would somehow like to minimize the drive angle ( I know all Ts have this situation), but it seems to me that the U-joint never sees a straight line and is always working to deal with this unnecessary angle to transmit power, and I can't raise the front of the motor. I know lots of builders that go to great lengths to set the drive angle to zero to make things more efficient and vibration free. Thanks again : Bruce
Bruce Compton, Canada is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-29-2015, 06:50 AM   #8
Royce P
Senior Member
 
Royce P's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Tulsa OK
Posts: 476
Default Re: Lowering a T

I don't see any advantage in making the model T single universal joint aim directly at the engine / differential. I think you are imagining something that is not a problem. Pack the U-joint with grease and forget about it.
__________________
1910 Touring
1914 Touring
1915 Touring
1917 Torpedo Runabout
Royce P is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2015, 06:09 PM   #9
flatheadman
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Lovelock, Nv
Posts: 20
Default Re: Lowering a T

I've found that a straight ujoint will vibrate more than one with at least 2 degrees of angle. They are designed to run at an angle.
flatheadman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2015, 10:17 PM   #10
Bruce Compton, Canada
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 416
Default Re: Lowering a T

I agree with 2 degrees, but my coupe is sitting at around 15 degrees, maybe more. I'm still thinking of removing the top two short leaves. Thanks : Bruce
Bruce Compton, Canada is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2015, 01:30 AM   #11
40 Deluxe
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: now Kuna, Idaho
Posts: 3,779
Default Re: Lowering a T

Part of the fun of this hobby is the personal tweaks we give our cars. It never hurts to experiment. Maybe your car has had extra spring leaves added in the past (you know, an early moonshine runner!).
40 Deluxe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2015, 03:44 AM   #12
C26Pinelake
BANNED
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Michigan / Ontario border, Sarnia, Ontario. 50 miles from Detroit and 150 from Toronto.
Posts: 5,800
Default Re: Lowering a T

Quote:
Originally Posted by redmodelt View Post
My T is bouncy enough with the full pack, I don't think you would like the ride with less springs in a coupe and yes they do more then add height. You could carry a small step stool like they use to have for boarding trains or add a rung under the running board. There was a photo just shown on the MTFCA site in the last couple of weeks of a touring with the extra rung. Maybe one of the slide out RV steps could be used under the running board. The "rake" between the rear end and transmission is how the car was designed and unless you have something way different then stock from the transmission back don't see why you would want to change it.
You could also get one of the reverse eye main leafs and see if that would do the job.
https://www.modeltford.com/item/3824RVA.aspx
This is good advice ! Wayne
C26Pinelake is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:40 AM.