Go Back   The Ford Barn > General Discussion > Early V8 (1932-53)

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-17-2018, 11:55 AM   #1
Kube
Senior Member
 
Kube's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Wisconsin, USA
Posts: 9,020
Default rleated to NOS vs NORS thread: "restored"

Id enjoyed the thread started earlier today in regard to the true definition of NOS vs. NORS parts. I am hoping a number of folks will pay attention to Dave and learn from his very accurate response.
Now, along those lines...
"RESTORED" is one word that is nearly always misused.

A fellow can't describe a car as "RESTORED" and then go on to explain all the "upgrades" that he installed as well as the candy apple red paint, etc.

Restore: to repair or renovate (a building, work of art, vehicle, etc.) so as to return it to its original condition.
__________________
"I can explain it for you. However, I can't understand it for you".
Kube is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2018, 12:06 PM   #2
FortyNiner
Senior Member
 
FortyNiner's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: u-rah-rah-Wisconsin
Posts: 1,139
Default Re: rleated to NOS vs NORS thread: "restored"

Amen. Tell this to the auction house folks - who should know better.
__________________
19 and 49 F1 - jes' like Henry II built
1946 Deluxe - as Henry built it
FortyNiner is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
Old 02-17-2018, 12:52 PM   #3
tubman
Senior Member
 
tubman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Minnesota, Florida Keys
Posts: 10,330
Default Re: rleated to NOS vs NORS thread: "restored"

Quote:
Originally Posted by FortyNiner View Post
Amen. Tell this to the auction house folks - who should know better.
Yeah, but it doesn't serve their purposes.
tubman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2018, 01:01 PM   #4
RalphM
Senior Member
 
RalphM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: North Pole, Alaska
Posts: 2,651
Default Re: rleated to NOS vs NORS thread: "restored"

Kinda like the word “Vintage”, which is thrown around a lot. I’ve seen new made stuff for sale advertised as vintage. And they are not wrong because it could be 2017 Vintage!
See Webster’s; “a period origin or manufacture”
RalphM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2018, 01:39 PM   #5
Kurt in NJ
Senior Member
 
Kurt in NJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: on the Littlefield
Posts: 6,159
Default Re: rleated to NOS vs NORS thread: "restored"

I like to look down inside doors when the windows are down to see if the "total restoration " was just a external paint restoration--- only saw one car at Hershey that the inside of the door was restored--- I know it is expensive, I have over 8 hours in a wiper motor and it worked before I started

Proper restoration to original specs would eliminate many "needed" modifications
Kurt in NJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2018, 02:05 PM   #6
Kube
Senior Member
 
Kube's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Wisconsin, USA
Posts: 9,020
Default Re: rleated to NOS vs NORS thread: "restored"

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kurt in NJ View Post
I like to look down inside doors when the windows are down to see if the "total restoration " was just a external paint restoration--- only saw one car at Hershey that the inside of the door was restored--- I know it is expensive, I have over 8 hours in a wiper motor and it worked before I started

Proper restoration to original specs would eliminate many "needed" modifications
You and I are on the same page. There are in reality few true total restorations. Guys that know my work, know that places that will never be seen once the car is assembled are as nice as places that will be seen.
With me, it's a matter of pride.
__________________
"I can explain it for you. However, I can't understand it for you".
Kube is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2018, 02:08 PM   #7
DavidG
Senior Member
 
DavidG's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: southeastern Michigan
Posts: 10,108
Default Re: rleated to NOS vs NORS thread: "restored"

A close second in the misnomer race is "barn find".
DavidG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2018, 02:13 PM   #8
petehoovie
Senior Member
 
petehoovie's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 8,220
Default Re: rleated to NOS vs NORS thread: "restored"

I like the "patina" of an "unrestored" "original" car....
__________________
The only thing nice about being imperfect is the joy it brings to others....

"Silver rings, your butt! Them's washers!"
"We shot our way out of that town for a dollar's worth of steel holes!" - from 'The Wild Bunch' - 1969

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7NReUd2_0u0
petehoovie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2018, 02:58 PM   #9
corvette8n
Senior Member
 
corvette8n's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: 36 miles north of Albany NY
Posts: 2,955
Default Re: rleated to NOS vs NORS thread: "restored"

Another term is how "Henry made it" if Henry Ford spent that much time on the assembly line, I sure Ford wouldn't have produced over twelve million flathead's.

When I was looking to buy my '41 I looked at a lot of "restored" cars with Chebby motors and automatics in them. To some sellers modifying somehow means restored.
corvette8n is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2018, 05:22 PM   #10
DavidG
Senior Member
 
DavidG's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: southeastern Michigan
Posts: 10,108
Default Re: rleated to NOS vs NORS thread: "restored"

Does anyone know how what should be known as a 'body-off restoration' became the term 'frame-off restoration'? Physically, the latter makes no sense whatsoever. Maybe it came from the folks who brought us the sail-less mast of the steering column.
DavidG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2018, 06:45 PM   #11
Jack E/NJ
Senior Member
 
Jack E/NJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 2,173
Default Re: rleated to NOS vs NORS thread: "restored"

I'll guess body off means right side up. Frame off, upside down. Did I guess right? 8^) Jack E/NJ
Jack E/NJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2018, 07:05 PM   #12
flatford8
Senior Member
 
flatford8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Lyman,ME.
Posts: 2,634
Default Re: rleated to NOS vs NORS thread: "restored"

Quote:
Originally Posted by DavidG View Post
A close second in the misnomer race is "barn find".
“Barn find” pi$$es me off more than “restored to original” .
I’m dropping the frame out from under the body on my ‘51 for paint and floor patches but I still won’t call it “restored”......Mark
__________________
I'm thinkin' about crankin'
My ragged ol' truck up
and haulin' myself into town.
Billy Joe Shaver
flatford8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2018, 07:18 PM   #13
Jack E/NJ
Senior Member
 
Jack E/NJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 2,173
Default Re: rleated to NOS vs NORS thread: "restored"

Then how about calling it frame-drop refreshed? I'll bet that would sound impressive to some folks. Jack E/NJ
Jack E/NJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2018, 07:34 PM   #14
Ken/Alabama
Senior Member
 
Ken/Alabama's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Alabama
Posts: 3,265
Default Re: rleated to NOS vs NORS thread: "restored"

In my eyes the term "restored" means it's just like it rolled out of the Rouge plant. There are damn few "restored " Fords out there. I know there are lots of them that I call redone or refurbished , me included ,that have these cars and enjoy them but when the term " restored " is used it means a whole nother ball game for me.
Ken/Alabama is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2018, 02:25 AM   #15
Kurt in NJ
Senior Member
 
Kurt in NJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: on the Littlefield
Posts: 6,159
Default Re: rleated to NOS vs NORS thread: "restored"

On my model A i lifted the body off the frame ---body off restoration,
on my 36 the frame was dropped out from under the body---frame off restoration
Kurt in NJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2018, 08:18 AM   #16
flatford8
Senior Member
 
flatford8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Lyman,ME.
Posts: 2,634
Default Re: rleated to NOS vs NORS thread: "restored"

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ken/Alabama View Post
In my eyes the term "restored" means it's just like it rolled out of the Rouge plant. There are damn few "restored " Fords out there. I know there are lots of them that I call redone or refurbished , me included ,that have these cars and enjoy them but when the term " restored " is used it means a whole nother ball game for me.
I’m going with “ resurrected “......Mark
__________________
I'm thinkin' about crankin'
My ragged ol' truck up
and haulin' myself into town.
Billy Joe Shaver
flatford8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2018, 12:35 PM   #17
skidmarks
Senior Member
 
skidmarks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: newark, delaware
Posts: 3,735
Default Re: rleated to NOS vs NORS thread: "restored"

Fixed up junk fits a lot of stuff, anymore i just like something that's roadworthy and i dont have to worry about it. Both of these fits most cars i see that are called restored.

I remember seeing a car that was suppose to to have nice solid floors. After a closer look most of the the floor was cut out.
The seller was a shister and his patsy stuck up for him by saying YOU HAVE TO READ BETWEEN THE LINES when i asked about the nice solid floors.
skidmarks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2018, 01:16 PM   #18
Karl Wescott
Senior Member
 
Karl Wescott's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 1,292
Default Re: rleated to NOS vs NORS thread: "restored"

"Tongue in cheek" would a 1932 Roadster with Brookville (or Wescott) body, new TCI et al chassis, and a "crate" motor and transmission be considered "ALL ORIGINAL"?
Karl Wescott is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2018, 02:23 PM   #19
BoxCar Tom
Senior Member
 
BoxCar Tom's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Basking Ridge, NJ
Posts: 591
Default Re: rleated to NOS vs NORS thread: "restored"

What if a person started out with a single part (a luggage rack) and spent 30 years collecting only parts (from 23 states and lost track) that are to the best of his knowledge correct for a 65 year old 3 month production window, then rebuilt and refinished every part, then assembled a complete numbers matching finished car from those parts, (luggage rack not used) what would you call the end product. A recreation or a pleasant preoccupation?
BoxCar Tom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2018, 02:28 PM   #20
DavidG
Senior Member
 
DavidG's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: southeastern Michigan
Posts: 10,108
Default Re: rleated to NOS vs NORS thread: "restored"

Both those and also quite possibly a restoration depending on how well all of the parts were put together. In other words, once the parts are off the shelves and put together, how is the result not a whole vehicle?
DavidG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2018, 02:43 PM   #21
Kube
Senior Member
 
Kube's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Wisconsin, USA
Posts: 9,020
Default Re: rleated to NOS vs NORS thread: "restored"

Quote:
Originally Posted by BoxCar Tom View Post
What if a person started out with a single part (a luggage rack) and spent 30 years collecting only parts (from 23 states and lost track) that are to the best of his knowledge correct for a 65 year old 3 month production window, then rebuilt and refinished every part, then assembled a complete numbers matching finished car from those parts, (luggage rack not used) what would you call the end product. A recreation or a pleasant preoccupation?
Does this official definition help?

Restore: to repair or renovate (a building, work of art, vehicle, etc.) so as to return it to its original condition.
__________________
"I can explain it for you. However, I can't understand it for you".
Kube is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2018, 03:36 PM   #22
AnthonyG
Senior Member
 
AnthonyG's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Pa.
Posts: 2,174
Default Re: rleated to NOS vs NORS thread: "restored"

The Rotisserie Refreshed on an auto twirler is interesting. I've seen sellers call it Rotisserie Restored that's possible for everything except what was between the chassis & floors.
__________________
Nomad
AnthonyG is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
Old 02-19-2018, 11:02 AM   #23
itslow
Senior Member
 
itslow's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Central Iowa
Posts: 693
Default Re: rleated to NOS vs NORS thread: "restored"

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ken/Alabama View Post
In my eyes the term "restored" means it's just like it rolled out of the Rouge plant. There are damn few "restored " Fords out there. I know there are lots of them that I call redone or refurbished , me included ,that have these cars and enjoy them but when the term " restored " is used it means a whole nother ball game for me.
Agreed. Very, very few are restored to match how they would have rolled out of the factories.

Many are over-restored. Many are under-restored.
__________________
Mike

Wanted:
- '32-34 Open Cab Pickup (RPU) parts and documents/articles/info
- ARDUN parts
itslow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2018, 11:04 AM   #24
itslow
Senior Member
 
itslow's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Central Iowa
Posts: 693
Default Re: rleated to NOS vs NORS thread: "restored"

Quote:
Originally Posted by DavidG View Post
Does anyone know how what should be known as a 'body-off restoration' became the term 'frame-off restoration'?
What if the car is down-under? "Off-Frame" is a bit more awkward to say.
__________________
Mike

Wanted:
- '32-34 Open Cab Pickup (RPU) parts and documents/articles/info
- ARDUN parts
itslow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2018, 11:19 AM   #25
mike in tucson
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 177
Default Re: rleated to NOS vs NORS thread: "restored"

I am in awe of those who "restore" something like a 1910 Rolls when they start with maybe a small piece of the grille shell and fabricate everything else.
mike in tucson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2018, 11:34 AM   #26
B-O-B
Senior Member
 
B-O-B's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Ft Mohave,Az
Posts: 1,987
Default Re: rleated to NOS vs NORS thread: "restored"

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
The one that gets me is RARE. Overused & abused.
The guy that sold me the 34 roadster said he restored the chassis wow that was funny as it was just painted over the dirt and grease. Shackles & brake shoes were worn out but freshly painted.
They are original only once.
B-O-B is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2018, 12:10 PM   #27
DavidG
Senior Member
 
DavidG's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: southeastern Michigan
Posts: 10,108
Default Re: rleated to NOS vs NORS thread: "restored"

But, "body-off" isn't (more awkward to say) and from that standpoint, slightly less awkward to say.

I have yet to see a restoration commence with turning the car upside down and removing the frame from the body in that position, hence my original question.
DavidG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2018, 12:38 PM   #28
rotorwrench
Senior Member
 
rotorwrench's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 16,453
Default Re: rleated to NOS vs NORS thread: "restored"

Hucksters and sales people in general use every advantageous term in the book to sell stuff whether it is correct terminology or not. They sometimes make stuff up as they go too. A person has to laugh about it and be sceptical of anything that can't be easily verified. If folks were honest and followed a complete path to originality, the only description needed would be "restored to original condition". Unfortunately, we all know that you can't change a half wit into a whole wit.
rotorwrench is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2018, 01:18 PM   #29
Hoop
Senior Member
 
Hoop's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Jacksonville FL
Posts: 1,137
Default Re: rleated to NOS vs NORS thread: "restored"

"Frame Off" was originally "Off-Frame" and makes more sense.

(By the way, I'm of the same mindset as Petehoovie. Preservation tops restoration.)
__________________
"Remember that when it comes to intelligence, half of all of us are below average."

Last edited by Hoop; 02-19-2018 at 04:16 PM.
Hoop is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2018, 03:55 PM   #30
woodiewagon46
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Long Island,NY
Posts: 1,555
Default Re: rleated to NOS vs NORS thread: "restored"

I have a question for David or Mike. I once read that NORS, New Old Replacement Stock, did not mean the stock was good. The article went on to say that, if a part didn't fit correctly on the assembly line or there was some other reason for it to be rejected, it was put into NORS status. Such as a dented fender or untapped hole. It went on to say that Ford wanted nothing thrown away or scrapped, so NORS it was. Any truth to the story?
woodiewagon46 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2018, 05:09 PM   #31
DavidG
Senior Member
 
DavidG's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: southeastern Michigan
Posts: 10,108
Default Re: rleated to NOS vs NORS thread: "restored"

Hoop,

Yes, "off-frame" makes perfectly perfectly good sense.


woodiewagon46,

There's some truth to that in the case of NOS parts, but I've not encountered it with NORS parts from well known period suppliers such as Thompson Products, Toledo Valve, etc.

In the case of "genuine" Ford NOS parts, miss-builds are sometimes encountered, but then they are also sometimes encountered in the parts used to assemble the car such as missing holes in stampings or hood panels that are longer or shorter than they should be. Even if a NOS part requires some rework, that extra effort is usually worth when it comes to fit, finish, and function compared to the alternatives.
DavidG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2018, 07:03 PM   #32
va t
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: small town Iowa
Posts: 55
Default Re: rleated to NOS vs NORS thread: "restored"

I call my project a "pieced together restoration" having started with an original frame and collecting parts over a period of 50+ years. Is it 100% correct? It is close, due to the expertise of David Rehor and others who willingly share their knowledge. The help of others is appreciated and vital when you don''t know the answers.
va t is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2018, 07:22 PM   #33
DavidG
Senior Member
 
DavidG's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: southeastern Michigan
Posts: 10,108
Default Re: rleated to NOS vs NORS thread: "restored"

va t,

Sounds like a net project; have a photo or two to share?

David
DavidG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2018, 11:10 PM   #34
RalphM
Senior Member
 
RalphM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: North Pole, Alaska
Posts: 2,651
Default Re: rleated to NOS vs NORS thread: "restored"

Quote:
Originally Posted by itslow View Post
What if the car is down-under? "Off-Frame" is a bit more awkward to say.
It’s easier “Down Under” because the car is upside down!
RalphM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2018, 08:41 AM   #35
deuce5wndw
Senior Member
 
deuce5wndw's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Liberty, KY
Posts: 905
Default Re: rleated to NOS vs NORS thread: "restored"

Quote:
Originally Posted by skidmarks View Post
Fixed up junk fits a lot of stuff, anymore i just like something that's roadworthy and i dont have to worry about it. Both of these fits most cars i see that are called restored.

I remember seeing a car that was suppose to to have nice solid floors. After a closer look most of the the floor was cut out.
The seller was a shister and his patsy stuck up for him by saying YOU HAVE TO READ BETWEEN THE LINES when i asked about the nice solid floors.
Reminds me of a car I saw at Charotte one time had rusty floors and on the windshield a big sign said Rust free! We never charge for rust!
deuce5wndw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2018, 09:08 AM   #36
rockfla
Senior Member
 
rockfla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Jacksonville FL
Posts: 3,973
Default Re: rleated to NOS vs NORS thread: "restored"

Quote:
Originally Posted by DavidG View Post
A close second in the misnomer race is "barn find".
And third for me is "Rare"
rockfla is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2018, 11:24 AM   #37
Karl Wescott
Senior Member
 
Karl Wescott's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 1,292
Default Re: rleated to NOS vs NORS thread: "restored"

Quote:
Originally Posted by rockfla View Post
And third for me is "Rare"
Tongue in cheek again... "Rare" is the opposite of "Well Done"
Karl Wescott is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2018, 12:40 PM   #38
Byron Warwick
Senior Member
 
Byron Warwick's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Corunna, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 309
Default Re: rleated to NOS vs NORS thread: "restored"

Here are the before and after pictures of my, purchased in 1957 pickup. It now has lots of mods, but it is still flat and still reliable. The renewed picture is the day it came out of the garage in 2009.
What do I call the repairs I made? Refreshed?
Attached Images
File Type: jpg LHS.jpg (62.6 KB, 32 views)
File Type: jpg 100_0624.jpg (121.1 KB, 32 views)
__________________
IT'S NOT YOUR AGE, IT'S YOUR ATTITUDE !
Byron Warwick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2018, 01:07 PM   #39
DavidG
Senior Member
 
DavidG's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: southeastern Michigan
Posts: 10,108
Default Re: rleated to NOS vs NORS thread: "restored"

Extensive!
DavidG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2018, 01:54 PM   #40
Kube
Senior Member
 
Kube's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Wisconsin, USA
Posts: 9,020
Default Re: rleated to NOS vs NORS thread: "restored"

Quote:
Originally Posted by rockfla View Post
And third for me is "Rare"
I've actually written sellers on eBay that have advertised "rare this, rare that" and then within the description, admit they have no clue what it is for. I ask them how they know it is rare if they have no clue what it is or what it is for.
Because they only have one?
__________________
"I can explain it for you. However, I can't understand it for you".
Kube is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2018, 03:00 PM   #41
V8COOPMAN
Senior Member
 
V8COOPMAN's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: East Shore of LAKE HOUSTON
Posts: 11,117
Default Re: rleated to NOS vs NORS thread: "restored"

Quote:
Originally Posted by Byron Warwick View Post
Here are the before and after pictures of my, purchased in 1957 pickup. It now has lots of mods, but it is still flat and still reliable. The renewed picture is the day it came out of the garage in 2009.
What do I call the repairs I made? Refreshed?
Isn't that what is now referred to as....."It'll polish right out".....? DD
__________________
Click Links Below __


'35-'36 W/8BA & MECHANICAL FAN


T5 W/TORQUE TUBE
V8COOPMAN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2018, 07:14 PM   #42
NealinCA
Senior Member
 
NealinCA's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Central Coast, Calif.
Posts: 839
Default Re: rleated to NOS vs NORS thread: "restored"

"Rebuilt" is also subject to interpretation.
NealinCA is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
Old 02-23-2018, 08:02 PM   #43
cas3
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: sw minnesota
Posts: 4,584
Default Re: rleated to NOS vs NORS thread: "restored"

i always say, rebuilt by who, and what did they do.
cas3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2018, 08:21 PM   #44
tubman
Senior Member
 
tubman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Minnesota, Florida Keys
Posts: 10,330
Default Re: rleated to NOS vs NORS thread: "restored"

I'm beginning to think "Refurbished" means a spray bottle of "409" and a rag.
tubman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2018, 08:32 PM   #45
V8COOPMAN
Senior Member
 
V8COOPMAN's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: East Shore of LAKE HOUSTON
Posts: 11,117
Default Re: rleated to NOS vs NORS thread: "restored"

Personally, I like the term "Earl Sheib Restoration"! That should cover a large portion of the BS being passed-off as anything like a true RESTORATION. DD
__________________
Click Links Below __


'35-'36 W/8BA & MECHANICAL FAN


T5 W/TORQUE TUBE
V8COOPMAN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2018, 09:25 PM   #46
va t
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: small town Iowa
Posts: 55
Default Re: rleated to NOS vs NORS thread: "restored"

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
Here is my "Pieced together restoration" retirement project. It lacks a few correct pieces but has correct 32 v8. After owning original frame for over 50 years, found I had matching # transmission, all junk except for the case! Car is owner built to this point. Metal work is my "golf game". Feel fortunate to be working on one of my favorite automobiles. Vance
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 100_2682.jpg (55.5 KB, 47 views)
va t is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2018, 09:49 PM   #47
V8COOPMAN
Senior Member
 
V8COOPMAN's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: East Shore of LAKE HOUSTON
Posts: 11,117
Default Re: rleated to NOS vs NORS thread: "restored"

Quote:
Originally Posted by va t View Post
Here is my "Pieced together restoration" retirement project. It lacks a few correct pieces but has correct 32 v8. After owning original frame for over 50 years, found I had matching # transmission, all junk except for the case! Car is owner built to this point. Metal work is my "golf game". Feel fortunate to be working on one of my favorite automobiles. Vance
va t....I really don't believe that YOU're gonna have to dodge too much flack on that one when using the term "restored"! That 3-window looks awfully nice from here!! DD
__________________
Click Links Below __


'35-'36 W/8BA & MECHANICAL FAN


T5 W/TORQUE TUBE
V8COOPMAN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2018, 12:32 PM   #48
Byron Warwick
Senior Member
 
Byron Warwick's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Corunna, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 309
Default Re: rleated to NOS vs NORS thread: "restored"

I remember being at that stage. It gets exciting to be that close. Looks like a spring debut; be sure to post the "ITS ALL DONE" pictures.
Cheers, Byron.
__________________
IT'S NOT YOUR AGE, IT'S YOUR ATTITUDE !
Byron Warwick is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:18 AM.