|
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
12-04-2022, 06:21 PM | #21 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 387
|
Re: Super annoyed: front and rear main seal
My guess would be you don’t really appreciate late 20-ties technology … better buy a Burz engine then …
Henry designed an engine knowing the state of the art of sealing materials at the time. So he left them out !
__________________
You don’t own a Model A ... it owns you ! |
12-05-2022, 10:50 AM | #22 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2021
Posts: 130
|
Re: Super annoyed: front and rear main seal
I am wondering what the O.P. has gotten from this thread. Lots of good info. Two things: the aluminum piece that fits into the block A or B is an "oil retainer". It is not a seal of any kind. Ford never called it a seal. Parts houses seem to use the term seal which is misleading especially to newbies. Another point to be made is the crankcase pressure caused by blow by is the same in the air space and in the oil.
|
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
12-05-2022, 11:25 AM | #23 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Red Deer, Alberta
Posts: 5,056
|
Re: Super annoyed: front and rear main seal
If you're going to use plastigage to measure the rear main clearance, w/the engine in the car, you'll need to support the crankshaft (up) so you get a true reading of the clearance.
__________________
If you don't hear a rumor by 10 AM, start one!. Got my education out behind the barn! |
12-05-2022, 11:39 AM | #24 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Cow Hampshire
Posts: 4,188
|
Re: Super annoyed: front and rear main seal
Quote:
Were the crank sitting in a position on the engine stand "up-facing" and no rods attached you would have your best possible reading which is one where gravity works "with" you. Like a reading you could then use to peel off a layer of the rod shims. I think laying under the engine and removing any crank bearing cap, you want to use the jack (or a porta-power) to push the crank "up" and then apply the plastigage and cap to get the reading. There is something satisfying about "removing all the slop" as you get the reading. You can't trust that the crank doesn't "sag" or the bearing possibly "non-concentric" which will affect the plastigauge reading. My first go-around was done with the jack. That engine (red Allstate replacement) had about 70K miles on it (150K total on the car) It's not easy no matter how you do it. Engine later removed I used the engine-stand and did it while standing next to it - MUCH EASIER. Almost human. Now I wouldn't bother to try to plastigage an engine in place. Removal is not that difficult and I do now have the tools (overhead gantry) to do it right. Don't forget to remove the wishbone connection to the transmission - been there done that. Overhead gantry can be made using two 2x12x8' planks, 4x4 verticals and two more 2x12x4' stringers. Use large washers at the allthread-thru bolts holding it together. Diagonal braces nailed in place will increase your confidence against a lateral failure - and can be easily removed. Joe K
__________________
Shudda kept the horse. |
|
12-05-2022, 11:44 AM | #25 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Germantown,TN
Posts: 520
|
Re: Super annoyed: front and rear main seal
Quote:
Again “ I pulled my engine because I had a horrible rear oil leak” Last edited by GPierce; 12-05-2022 at 11:50 AM. |
|
|
|
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|