Go Back   The Ford Barn > General Discussion > Early V8 (1932-53)

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-15-2023, 01:59 AM   #21
The Liberator
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Redwood City, CA
Posts: 10
Default Re: Coumbia Control 37-41 for a 1932

So does any later speedo changer work on the early fords as well? IE: 46-48 on a 34? Thanks
The Liberator is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2023, 07:41 AM   #22
glennpm
Senior Member
 
glennpm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Wiscasset, Maine
Posts: 1,981
Default Re: Coumbia Control 37-41 for a 1932

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kube View Post
Although I'm not a "hot rod guy", I so appreciate work well done... keep it up
Thanks Kube!

My vacuum unit was stuck before I installed but after a bit of PB Blaster it freed up fine and has worked flawlessly. I also rebuilt my Columbia clutch replacing the cork, which was in excellent condition, with the HDPE plastic that John Connolly sells. This made the shifts a lot quieter.

My Columbia works fantastically and love it!

Glenn
glennpm is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
Old 01-15-2023, 07:43 AM   #23
glennpm
Senior Member
 
glennpm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Wiscasset, Maine
Posts: 1,981
Default Re: Coumbia Control 37-41 for a 1932

Quote:
Originally Posted by solidaxle View Post
That may work for my application, presently I don't have a speedo changer hooked up, but plan to.

Would you know the length of the cables?
No I don't know and I'm not going to measure mine. If you're not going to get an original, work the best lengths for your application. No need to be the same as the original.
glennpm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2023, 07:48 AM   #24
glennpm
Senior Member
 
glennpm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Wiscasset, Maine
Posts: 1,981
Default Re: Coumbia Control 37-41 for a 1932

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bored&Stroked View Post
Hey Glen: Thanks for all the information. One thing stuck out to me - you mentioned using the early 'B' style rear end? Why not the late 32 (scalloped torque tube) - which is what I have? They are pretty hard to come by, but from everything I know are a lot stronger than a 'B' style rear. Thoughts?
Hi B&S,

I wrote these notes up probably 40-50 years ago when I bought my Columbia from a good and very knowledgeable friend in the V8 Club Chapter I belonged to at the time. I edited my post #13 with the reason as I recall it. I didn't need to go further since I planned on using a 40 rear anyway.

But late ‘32 through ‘34 rear ends have narrower center sections. And these narrower center sections will not accept a Columbia made for ‘35 and newer cars (only late ‘32 through ‘34 Columbias fit in these older center sections).
glennpm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2023, 07:53 AM   #25
glennpm
Senior Member
 
glennpm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Wiscasset, Maine
Posts: 1,981
Default Re: Coumbia Control 37-41 for a 1932

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Liberator View Post
So does any later speedo changer work on the early fords as well? IE: 46-48 on a 34? Thanks
We're talking about the vacuum control switch and not the SW speedo gearbox.
Others would have to respond to your question since my gearbox is for the 37-41 Columbia.

Glenn
glennpm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2023, 08:20 AM   #26
glennpm
Senior Member
 
glennpm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Wiscasset, Maine
Posts: 1,981
Default Re: Coumbia Control 37-41 for a 1932

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
B&S, just searched and found this link, 1932 REAR AXLE AND TRANS

https://www.jalopyjournal.com/forum/...trans.1106833/
glennpm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2023, 08:07 AM   #27
Bored&Stroked
Senior Member
 
Bored&Stroked's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Central Ohio
Posts: 5,070
Default Re: Coumbia Control 37-41 for a 1932

Thanks Glen - am quite versed in the various 32 - 34 rears - have all of them. But, I've never 'grafted' a Columbia into a late 32 - 34 rear. I've already got the "bullet proof" steel parts made out of 8620 steel and later style axles. So, I think I have everything I need to give it a whirl. Also, have a big steel alignment bar - used to ensure that when you weld in the grafted Columbia housing and the outer 32 spring bearing/spring hanger, that it is running true to the centerline of the axle and carrier. Will report back next Spring once I'm into it.
Bored&Stroked is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2023, 08:21 AM   #28
glennpm
Senior Member
 
glennpm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Wiscasset, Maine
Posts: 1,981
Default Re: Coumbia Control 37-41 for a 1932

Good, looking forward to your report.

Glenn
glennpm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2023, 01:47 PM   #29
solidaxle
Senior Member
 
solidaxle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: upstate NY
Posts: 478
Default Re: Coumbia Control 37-41 for a 1932

Bored&Stroked




You can easily use your late 32 center section without altering the axles or rear spring. My unit started life as a wider track 42-48 style. The Columbia side of the casing needs to be cut down and a stock 33-34 rear outer axle casing was aligned and welded on to make the Columbia the correct 32-34 width.The drivers side of the rear is my stock 32 housing and axle. A 5/32" ring is also added to the rear banjo housing to get the correct overall length and gear mesh. John Connelly sells the ring.

Last edited by solidaxle; 01-16-2023 at 04:10 PM.
solidaxle is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:27 AM.