07-26-2018, 10:48 AM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Endeavor, WI
Posts: 119
|
.027" or .035"
The Owner's manual says plugs should be at .027" gap but the Les Andrews book says .035". I have a 1931 Tudor...stock. Any thoughts from you pros out there?
__________________
"I have not yet begun to defile myself." -Doc Holliday '31 Tudor, '69 F100, '66 Mustang, '11 Ford Flex |
07-26-2018, 10:57 AM | #2 |
BANNED
Join Date: Oct 2017
Posts: 128
|
Re: .027" or .035"
unfortunately there are many errors in the Andrews books
|
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
07-26-2018, 10:58 AM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NC
Posts: 2,975
|
Re: .027" or .035"
The wider the gap the stronger the spark. But there is a point when it can no longer jump the gap. Pus it will take easies path just like we do. I say .032
|
07-26-2018, 11:04 AM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Connecticut Shoreline
Posts: 1,824
|
Re: .027" or .035"
Have used .35 for almost 60 years.
|
07-26-2018, 11:14 AM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 5,963
|
Re: .027" or .035"
I use .035. and .027 with a high compression head
|
07-26-2018, 12:05 PM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: So Cal
Posts: 8,754
|
Re: .027" or .035"
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
from .027" to .035"." Bob |
07-26-2018, 12:12 PM | #7 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Endeavor, WI
Posts: 119
|
Re: .027" or .035"
Quote:
That settles it! Awesome.
__________________
"I have not yet begun to defile myself." -Doc Holliday '31 Tudor, '69 F100, '66 Mustang, '11 Ford Flex |
|
07-26-2018, 12:20 PM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Battle Ground WA
Posts: 293
|
Re: .027" or .035"
Are you 6v or 12v? A good 12v system should easily support .035". If you are still 6v, you might want to stay around .030", though I've run .035" on 6v without trouble. Tighter gap, easier to fowel, bigger gap more chance of missfire, and hard start if on 6v system. Everything is a trade off, there is no one "right" answer.
__________________
Corley ----------------- Subscribed to the KISS principle! |
07-26-2018, 12:26 PM | #9 |
BANNED
Join Date: Oct 2017
Posts: 128
|
Re: .027" or .035"
exactly
engineering has advanced since the days of the SBs |
07-26-2018, 12:49 PM | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Windy City
Posts: 2,919
|
Re: .027" or .035"
The spark in a Kettering system is a function of coil impedance ratio and current density. Primary voltage, 3,6,12,24V is not related to the output energy or voltage at which the coil will discharge that energy across a plug gap.
The Minimum discharge voltage across a plug gap is determined by the atmosphere in the gap (compression ratio and water content of the air), condition of the electrodes (clean, sharp edges), and surrounding field ionization. With the extremely low compression of an A, even with a 6:1 head, which is LOW, clean plugs will fire reliably on 6V Kettering system at much more than 0.035" gap. Thus the very conservative 35 in the service bulletins. All the talk about smaller gaps is a carryover from non-inertia start magneto systems that produce a much lower output at cranking speed than a Kettering system. Last edited by MikeK; 07-26-2018 at 10:03 PM. |
07-26-2018, 02:03 PM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Alabama
Posts: 8,099
|
Re: .027" or .035"
I agree!!! I have also used a gap of .035 for my model A's and other cars with points ignition for nearly 60 years with good results . Like Bob C said , Ford changed the gap from .027 to .035 . Too much gap with weak ignition can shorten coil life . I run the Pertronix flame thrower coil . An original model A coil can easily handle a gap of .035 or even more . |
07-26-2018, 06:25 PM | #12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Portland OR
Posts: 6,342
|
Re: .027" or .035"
Bob C has it, we just talked about this today at the shop.
__________________
I know the voices aren't real but damn they have some good ideas! |
07-26-2018, 06:39 PM | #13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Danbury Ct
Posts: 1,254
|
Re: .027" or .035"
The coil type can make a difference. I switched from the unknown brand 6V coil that was on my car, to a original slant pole coil that a friend spotted (I sent him picture of one, so he knew what to look for.) and picked up for me at Hersey, because it was more appropriate for my 29 tudor. Well you could practically hear my car sigh when I first started it with the slant pole! It started quicker, idled better, and generally had more pep. Like Model A Viagra!
|
07-26-2018, 10:05 PM | #14 |
BANNED
Join Date: Oct 2017
Posts: 128
|
Re: .027" or .035"
The fact remains that it requires a higher voltage to fire a lean mixture, and A Model A does not have a lean mixture compared to a modern vehicle
https://books.google.com/books?id=UP...ixture&f=false |
07-27-2018, 08:48 AM | #15 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Battle Ground WA
Posts: 293
|
Re: .027" or .035"
Quote:
However, if everything is kept up to snuff, .035 should not be a problem on a 6v car, and it should even be capable of wider gaps. You are absolutely correct in saying that a 6v model A ignition system should work fine at .035 gap, but in my opinion, as an electrical engineer, a good condition 12v system can do even better. Much better. Lean burn? Yes, that is one important reason high energy ignition systems were implimented in all regular cars, nothing to do with racing. Not in our scope of discussion, bringing that in is just adding confusion to a simple topic.
__________________
Corley ----------------- Subscribed to the KISS principle! |
|
07-27-2018, 09:58 AM | #16 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Sunrise Beach, Mo
Posts: 439
|
Re: .027" or .035"
Had some ignition troubles with my purchased Model A. Got the plugs out, and the electrode ends were kind of worn and checked the gap and they varied from 045 to 050!
Replaced the plugs and read someplace a gap of 032 to 035! Set them there, found some other ignition stuff to fix and the car has been running good since then! Plugs are gapped at 032! (or were) |
07-28-2018, 03:46 AM | #17 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 2,101
|
Re: .027" or .035"
|
07-28-2018, 07:46 AM | #18 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Battle Ground WA
Posts: 293
|
Re: .027" or .035"
Pretty sure he is just saying a higher compression ratio requires a hotter spark since the spark does not like to jump as well when under compression. Frankly, any head on a streetable model A engine is low enough CR for this to be a rather moot point. (Streetable infering not a super high performance racing engine.). If everything is sixes, Bob's your uncle with .035" on your model A.
__________________
Corley ----------------- Subscribed to the KISS principle! |
07-28-2018, 09:39 AM | #19 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: FRESNO, CA
Posts: 12,560
|
Re: .027" or .035"
Has everyone "MADE UP" & back to figuring out, "WHAT'S FOR BREAKFAST"???----Who cares what kind of coil you're running??? as long as it runs GOOD!
IF it doesn't run well, try painting the coil a DIFFERENT COLOR. Bill & Dog Hungry
__________________
"THE ASSISTANT GURU OF STUFF" Last edited by BILL WILLIAMSON; 07-28-2018 at 10:16 AM. |
07-28-2018, 10:48 AM | #20 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 5,963
|
Re: .027" or .035"
The smaller gap with higher compression heads is just something I read and adopted. It works fine for me. Smooth running and never fouling.
|
|
|
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|