|
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
06-22-2018, 10:45 AM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Davenport, Iowa
Posts: 2,112
|
1937 Drag Link Confusion
Hello again from the Model A and T Ford world where I normally live! I’m returning to the “Fordbarn” early V-8 arena with a request for advice to help repair my 88 year-old friend’s 1937 Standard Fordor Sedan, which he has owned from the late 1950’s. You have helped me in the past with questions about repairing the braking system, which turned out quite successfully, thank you. We are now trying to solve a problem with increasing free play at the steering wheel. It’s getting scary to drive the car now! My experience is with 1909-1931 Fords, so my only knowledge in regards to my friend’s early V-8 is what I have gleaned from the Internet, this website and a stack of books and manuals that he owns. An Internet and website search here did not answer my dilemma with the drag link. So, I again turn to you guys. Please forgive my ignorance about what is probably a very mundane problem to you all.
Firstly, I adjusted the large nut on the steering box as far as it would go, which wasn't much. Virtually no change resulted in the play at the steering wheel. I then had my friend turn the steering wheel back and forth while I watched the steering arm (pitman arm in Model A speak) and the tie rod action. The ball joint at the steering arm moved quite a bit before the wheels began to move. That would translate to play at the steering wheel. Aha! Worn ball joints are the culprit! Time to replace all four ball joints, which I’m sure are original and past their expiration date. My friend ordered a new drag link assembly from Mac’s, part #11Y-3306 on page 20 of the 2018 Mac’s catalog, which is supposed to fit 1935-1941 passenger cars and trucks. It’s the only drag link listed for our 1937 passenger car. The shipping box arrived earlier this week, so yesterday I jacked up the front of the car, placed it on jack stands, removed the front wheels and knocked out the drag link and tie rod from their mounts. To my surprise, the removed drag link is a thick, straight bar with no bends, unlike the new drag link. See the attached comparison photo. In reading through a couple 1937 manuals and studying the lone exploded view of the 1937 front end that I could find, this straight drag link is probably Ford part #68-3306, which was a carry-over to early 1937 Fords from the 1936 models. According to the text on page 4-10 of “The 1937 Ford Book”, there were a couple drag link designs used in 1937: 68-3306, 78-3306-A1 and 78-3306-A2 (Thompson design), which had originally been designated 78-3306-B. Is what was on the car as seen in the accompanying photos an early drag link 68-3306? Only one end has a replaceable ball joint, so in order to replace worn drag link ball joints, it appears that the entire assembly must be purchased as a unit. But from where? I see no comparable straight drag link in Mac’s catalog for early V-8's, so I assume such an animal is not available. So, is the new drag link usable or will it cause problems? As long as it is adjusted to the same length as the old one I removed, I can’t see that this one would cause a problem, unless there is an interference issue during its travel side-to-side. Why else would bends be placed in the new drag link, if not to eliminate hitting the oil pan or other chassis components? Is this an improved version of the carried-over 1936 straight bar drag link? Will its noticeably thinner diameter be too weak for this heavy passenger car? Finally, judging by the orientation of the drag link pictured in the catalog, I assume the adjustable end goes on the driver’s side? Because steering is kind of important, I’d like to get this all straight in my mind and install the proper parts. Thanks in advance for your input! Marshall V. Daut Davenport, Iowa |
06-22-2018, 10:58 AM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Coral Springs FL
Posts: 10,950
|
Re: 1937 Drag Link Confusion
I don't know the exact answer to your question but, check out this Speedway drag link available in different lengths for $59.
https://www.speedwaymotors.com/Plain...Ends,3306.html |
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
06-22-2018, 01:28 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: southeastern Michigan
Posts: 10,101
|
Re: 1937 Drag Link Confusion
The original drag link in your photos is one of the 78-prefix versions. The difference between the 68-prefix and 78-prefix versions is simply the location of the grease fitting on the fixed end. That fitting is on the side of the ball joint housing on the 68-prefix version, but it was moved to the bottom, as in your photos, on the 78-prefix version.
It could be the photos, but the replacement looks to be a little longer than your original, but it may work if there are no clearance issues and it can be adjusted to the required length. As for the strength of the replacement bar, it is not so much the diameter alone that will determine its strength, but rather a combination of its diameter and metallurgy that we determine its strength. As shown in the photo below of an installed 78-prefix drag link, the non-adjustable end attaches to the Pitman arm. |
06-22-2018, 01:29 PM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 332
|
Re: 1937 Drag Link Confusion
I recently re built my entire 37 front end. The drag link and tie rods ends I bought from Joe's Antique, and they were reasonable and direct replacement fit for me. The attached PDF illustrates the assembly.
Sorry, just tried to attach the pdf and it failed. It is way under the stated max file size, go figure. You can pm with your email address and I will send it that way. gregg |
06-22-2018, 05:55 PM | #5 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: NorCal
Posts: 68
|
Re: 1937 Drag Link Confusion
I recently replaced all the tie-rod ends and drag-link on my 37 sedan. The aftermarket Bob Drake drag-link that I got has the bend. DavidG is correct about the fixed end attachment to the pitman arm. I have no clearance issues with the new drag-link.
__________________
Ed "I find that the harder I work, the more luck I seem to have." - Thomas Jefferson |
06-23-2018, 06:38 PM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 4,751
|
Re: 1937 Drag Link Confusion
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
The replacement you have looks to be a modern replacement of the 11Y style drag link. If your not happy with it look for a NOS 11Y style drag link |
06-23-2018, 07:05 PM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Davenport, Iowa
Posts: 2,112
|
Re: 1937 Drag Link Confusion
Thank you all for your most helpful input. I had thought that the drag link I removed was original to this car, as its caked-on years of crud matched the thickness and color of the other front end components. It appeared to have come from the factory with the other chassis parts. And once again, as anything Ford post-1931 is unchartered territory for me, I don't have enough knowledge about early V-8's to recognize that the drag link I removed is a Rube Goldberg ad hoc contraption. Now I know better! Because my friend has owned the car for about 60 years and has had no serious mechanical repairs made in the interim (except the brakes that I fixed three years ago), someone must have made the drag link substitution during its first 20 years before he bought the car. With the availability of early V-8 parts from 1937 through the late 1950's, it's hard to believe someone would go to all the trouble of fabricating this drag link, risking his life on the quality of the weld job. Certainly a new replacement drag link could have still been purchased over the counter at any Ford dealership. Oh, well. Now I have yet another interesting story to tell my friend about his car.
So, it would appear that the drag link ordered from Mac's is, in fact, the correct one we need. Based on everyone's input so far, I'll go ahead and match the length of the new drag link to that of the removed one, paint it and then install it. Thanks again to everyone, who responded! Marshall |
|
|
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|