Go Back   The Ford Barn > General Discussion > Model A (1928-31)

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-27-2025, 05:41 PM   #41
Steve in Tampa
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 106
Default Re: Oil Pan baffle question

can a model a splash pan be used in a model b oil pan, in a model B engine with a counter balanced crank?
Steve in Tampa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2025, 08:14 PM   #42
Klattu1929
Member
 
Join Date: May 2023
Location: Washington State
Posts: 45
Default Re: Oil Pan baffle question

Could using an oil pump splash shield with the original height rod dipper tray (not lowered 1/8"), and trimming 1/8" from the oil pump splash shield for required clearance be possible for a bit mere oil control? Maybe not as much control as with the ford setup but some none the less. And running the oil level midway on the dipstick. Is there any documentation how successful fords changes to the lowering of the dip tray and addition of the oil pump shield were lowering oil consumption? Not considering the piston ring changes also as part of the equation.
Klattu1929 is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
Old 04-28-2025, 05:50 AM   #43
Joe K
Senior Member
 
Joe K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Cow Hampshire
Posts: 4,610
Default Re: Oil Pan baffle question

Quote:
Originally Posted by Klattu1929 View Post
Could using an oil pump splash shield with the original height rod dipper tray (not lowered 1/8"), and trimming 1/8" from the oil pump splash shield for required clearance be possible for a bit mere oil control? Maybe not as much control as with the ford setup but some none the less. And running the oil level midway on the dipstick. Is there any documentation how successful fords changes to the lowering of the dip tray and addition of the oil pump shield were lowering oil consumption? Not considering the piston ring changes also as part of the equation.
The Service Bulletin is VERY specific: the shield is ONLY to be used with the lowered pan/tray.

The shield/tray warning is probably a "dimensional" thing. One imagines the shield is to guide to the sump the oil that would normally escape the pump/crankcase juncture (no gasket) and otherwise be thrown asunder by windage in the tray/crank area.

Of course if you "modify" the various parts to achieve a fit - one thinks "ok" and hopes that in your various mods, you find the one that does the trick - but what is the trick? Or the mod?

Not to say we shouldn't experiment. You're correct in asking about Ford previous findings. I can't say I've seen anything.

It's curious that Ford "loosened" the ring contact in attempting to limit oil travel "down" into the "windage" area. Almost like he was hoping to increase oil on the cylinder walls. This may be the wear aspect that drives this.

It's hard to know. Human minds are hard to read in the current consciousness, even less so given nearly 100 years elapsed time.

Joe K
__________________
Shudda kept the horse.

Last edited by Joe K; 04-28-2025 at 06:11 AM.
Joe K is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2025, 04:23 PM   #44
Steve in Tampa
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 106
Default Re: Oil Pan baffle question

Does anyone know,can a model a windage tray be used in a model b oil pan, in a model B engine with a counter balanced crank?? steve, thanks
Steve in Tampa is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:05 AM.