|
![]() |
#1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: NM
Posts: 2,443
|
![]()
There were Merc trucks in Canada that came with the 255. I had understood it was only '52's, but possible that also in '51. Only in M5 and M6 "big" trucks.
__________________
'52 F-1, EAB flathead |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Minnesota, Florida Keys
Posts: 11,629
|
![]()
After finding that the truck is an M6, I am revising my bet. (I originally thought it was a pickup.)
|
![]() |
![]() |
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
![]() |
#3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Southern Alberta
Posts: 582
|
![]()
hard to say what to do with it. it sits and does nothing
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: NM
Posts: 2,443
|
![]()
That's a '52 hood on the truck, the hood trim also appears to be '52. Can you post the serial number?
__________________
'52 F-1, EAB flathead |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Southern Alberta
Posts: 582
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Christchurch New Zealand
Posts: 1,640
|
![]() Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
Phil NZ |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: so cal, placerville, vegas
Posts: 1,414
|
![]()
Back to the original question... merc 4-in? Since you say you run it up, that means it's not stuck. So, pull a plug, and measure the stroke. I think it might have been Ron that posted long ago, regarding using a large zip tie (or other flexible 'something', like a cable.) I'll let others elaborate. Should be able to tell if it's 3.75 or 4.00
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Orcas Island Washington
Posts: 5,881
|
![]()
Not a betting man, but I'm hoping the zip tie says it's a 255. That truck that it's in is already a hotrod. Put a license plate on it (or not) and run it into town on a Saturday night. What could possibly go wrong?
__________________
Owner/Operator of 'Jailbar Ranch' on the side of Mt. Pickett. Current stable consists of 1946 1/2 ton pickup turned woodie wagon with FH V8, 1946 Tonner Pickup with 226 H six, 1979 Toyota landcruiser wagon, now wearing 1947 Ford Jailbar sheet metal. 'Rusty ol' floorboards, hot on their feet' (Alan Jackson) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Aliaga,Turkey
Posts: 77
|
![]() Quote:
And Nitrous, don't forget the Nitrous.
__________________
"Sometimes he would accuse chestnuts of being lazy, the sort of general malaise that only the genius possess and the insane lament." |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Liberty, KY
Posts: 987
|
![]()
Put a ramp bed on it and haul your hot rod!
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 17,409
|
![]()
I don't think an accurate measure can be taken with the heads on. The tie strap is generally used to find TDC on #1 cylinder. The crankshaft counterweight measurement across the cheek is a good way other wise pull a head and measure from TDC to BDC.
The F6 we had back in the day had a 239 CID engine but it wasn't made in Canada either. The F7 & F8 Big Jobs all either had the Lincoln 337 till 1952 then they had the 279 CID or 317 CID big Y-blocks in F7/F8 or F700/F800 respectively till 1956. Ford of Canada always did things differently so the larger F5 & F6 Ford trucks may have also had the 255 available to them. This is not common in the US. All the F1 through F6 Ford trucks I've worked on had 239 CID engines with 8RT heads. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Southern Alberta
Posts: 582
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Minnesota, Florida Keys
Posts: 11,629
|
![]()
Since this is said to be an original truck with an untouched engine, the combination of 1CM heads and a three-bolt carburetor has always bothered me. How about this scenario? The trucks had lower compression heads (8RT) than the cars (8BA). Maybe they ran out of 8RT heads and substituted 1CM units. The concurrent year Mercury's had a larger chamber because of the longer stroke. Everything turns out as it should, and the line keeps running.
Unfortunately, that would make it a 239. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2020
Location: BC Canada
Posts: 573
|
![]()
Can you see any casting marks on the block? Like "C1BA"...if so, good chance it has a 4" crank.
__________________
Sometimes, ingenuity gets in the way of sense and sanity. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Southern Alberta
Posts: 582
|
![]() Quote:
![]() ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: NE Iowa
Posts: 1,767
|
![]()
A friends parents bought a new 52 F-2, he was still using it in the 70's and I ask him about the Mercury heads. He said they were on it when it was new and they were to lower compression for trucks. But it was a USA build.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 2,908
|
![]()
Wow all those trucks! Not only was the 255 optional, but the M series 6 cyl 254" was in the mix. Newc
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 17,409
|
![]()
As far as I know (which I will admit is limited), the Canadian trucks came from the same plant whether they were Ford or Mercury at Walkerville at least till the Oakville plant was built later.
I think what Tubman was trying to get across is that Mercury engines generally used the 4-stud Holley 885 type carb so they had a different manifold and air filter. Ford US didn't put a 3-stud model 94 on a Mercury engine for the 8BA era. They generally always used the Holley 885 to the best of my knowledge. I can't say about Canada for any certainty but it does make a person think about what they were doing there. Mercury heads would have been comparable to truck heads for compression but they aren't the same. They are close but not the same. Trucks pulling heavy loads had to have lower compression and gearing for the engine to survive. Mercury heads were not as low a compression as truck heads but not far from it. They lowered the compression due to the increase in cubic inch displacement to keep the overall compression about the same as the 239 CID engines. This would lower the possibility of detonation under extreme loads. This is why I question the use of 1CM heads or any Mercury heads on a truck for that matter. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 523
|
![]()
I have a '50 C8BA block that had the C8CM heads on both sides, a four bolt intake, and a Merc crank and had never been bored.
My best guess is that they were short a proper Merc block and just put all the Merc guts in to satisfy the Merc it was to be matched to as the basic block was used for both Ford and Mercs. The block came out of a Merc. So who knows for sure what happened on the assembly line back in the day... |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: ohio
Posts: 1,103
|
![]()
The 8BA in my 52 Vic had Merc heads & cam. It ran quite well . When i rebuilt it, found out it had domed pistons. I think those pistons may have helped improve performance...?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|