|
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#21 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Jacksonville FL
Posts: 4,806
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#22 |
Member
Join Date: May 2016
Location: The City of Angels, CA
Posts: 62
|
![]()
I've pulled the pumps on my V-12 and I could not remember this "hidden" bolt you all are talking about so I googled some images of the V-8 pump. Wow... that was an interesting design decision, glad that bit of ingenuity didn't transfer to Lincoln.
|
![]() |
![]() |
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
![]() |
#23 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Oakhurst, CA
Posts: 141
|
![]() Quote:
"anti seize" It is just obviously considered a lubricant? The fact that is not listed has me wondering. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#24 |
Member Emeritus
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Wichita KS
Posts: 16,132
|
![]()
There is a lot of information on this to be found on the internet if you are interested. From some of the clamping force testing that has been done anti-seize is a bigger deal than something like oil, meaning the torque has to be reduced more with anti-seize to prevent over torqueing. I has seen suggestions of 35 to 50% reduction required. This is one of those subject like oil additivities where everyone is going to have a different post of view. The point is keep the anti-seize off of anything requiring critical torque values, such as rod bolts/nuts, head bolts, main bolts/nuts, etc.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#25 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Canada Where it snows
Posts: 2,059
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#26 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Coral Springs FL
Posts: 11,604
|
![]() Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|