Go Back   The Ford Barn > General Discussion > Model A (1928-31)

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-26-2023, 11:36 AM   #1
brito36
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Marengo. Illinois
Posts: 269
Default Re: Claim of 25% HP bump true?

With all the conversations on increased compression, larger carburetors, and intake manifolds, I would make sure that my lower end could handle all these improvements.
brito36 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2023, 01:02 PM   #2
47topless
Senior Member
 
47topless's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2022
Location: Northern Colorado
Posts: 463
Thumbs up Re: Claim of 25% HP bump true?

Quote:
Originally Posted by brito36 View Post
With all the conversations on increased compression, larger carburetors, and intake manifolds, I would make sure that my lower end could handle all these improvements.


Good suggestion. I'll start the Imodium right now.
But seriously, how would a person go about testing the integrity of the lower end engine components?
Thank you,
Phil
47topless is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
Old 11-26-2023, 02:13 PM   #3
Dodge
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Sonoma, CA.
Posts: 1,568
Default Re: Claim of 25% HP bump true?

Rob Doe,

Yes, its done all the time. If your going to run a B carb you need either a B manifold
or a bored out Model A manifold. The B manifold sets the carb at a different angle but can be corrected with ovaling the holes in the manifold out or using smaller bolts.
Dodge is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2023, 04:10 PM   #4
Synchro909
Senior Member
 
Synchro909's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 8,043
Default Re: Claim of 25% HP bump true?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dodge View Post
Rob Doe,

Yes, its done all the time. If your going to run a B carb you need either a B manifold
or a bored out Model A manifold. The B manifold sets the carb at a different angle but can be corrected with ovaling the holes in the manifold out or using smaller bolts.
Live and learn. I didn't know that. It might explain why my B carburettor cuts out when braking to a stop. The problem with a RHD car is the lug on the intake manifold for the ignition advance mechanism which is present on an A manifold but missing on a B because they supposedly had automatic advance in the distributor.
I am guessing here but does the change lower the intake or raise it. Details would be very welcome.
__________________
I sometimes wonder what happened to the people who asked me for directions.
Even at my age, I still like to look at a young, attractive woman but I can't really remember why.
Synchro909 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2023, 11:03 PM   #5
Dodge
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Sonoma, CA.
Posts: 1,568
Default Re: Claim of 25% HP bump true?

The difference is the carburetor sitting at a different angle side to side not front to back or up and down.
Your carb cutting out might be fuel shoshing, might be float level.
Dodge is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-2023, 01:03 AM   #6
1928 Sport Coupe
Member
 
1928 Sport Coupe's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2022
Location: Ohio
Posts: 84
Default Re: Claim of 25% HP bump true?

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
Quote:
Originally Posted by brito36 View Post
With all the conversations on increased compression, larger carburetors, and intake manifolds, I would make sure that my lower end could handle all these improvements.
I would like to install a High Compression head in either 5.5:1 or 6:1 such as Snyders, a "B" cam, a "B" carb, and a bored out "A" intake. If I were to use new poured Babbitt mains and rods would that be sufficient for the improvements I want to do? Which head would be the better choice, the 5.5:1 or 6:1? I have been told any HC head could destroy the center main bearing if you drive it at all aggressively. I would just like to be able to keep up with traffic when needed.
As far as I know this is the original 35K miles engine in the car (1930 Town Sedan) and I would like to keep it in the car. This way I could always return it to stock.

Thanks
1928 Sport Coupe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-2023, 12:25 PM   #7
Jim Brierley
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Temecula, CA
Posts: 4,251
Default Re: Claim of 25% HP bump true?

Quote:
Originally Posted by 1928 Sport Coupe View Post
I would like to install a High Compression head in either 5.5:1 or 6:1 such as Snyders, a "B" cam, a "B" carb, and a bored out "A" intake. If I were to use new poured Babbitt mains and rods would that be sufficient for the improvements I want to do? Which head would be the better choice, the 5.5:1 or 6:1? I have been told any HC head could destroy the center main bearing if you drive it at all aggressively. I would just like to be able to keep up with traffic when needed.
As far as I know this is the original 35K miles engine in the car (1930 Town Sedan) and I would like to keep it in the car. This way I could always return it to stock.

Thanks
Higher compression and other things that make more power CAN be harder on bearings, BUT don't if you ease back on the ignition timing a bit, which does 2 things. 1) it prevents detonation and 2) is needed because the fuel will be burning faster so is more apt to knock (detonate) Also, driving down the road takes exactly as much power with or without more power, so most driving will not affect the babbitt or anything else.
Jim Brierley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-2023, 12:15 PM   #8
Jim Brierley
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Temecula, CA
Posts: 4,251
Default Re: Claim of 25% HP bump true?

Quote:
Originally Posted by brito36 View Post
With all the conversations on increased compression, larger carburetors, and intake manifolds, I would make sure that my lower end could handle all these improvements.
Always a good idea, I have always run Model B engines, and they are strong, bigger bearings and better oiling system, but A engines are very strong and reliable too.
Jim Brierley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2024, 11:13 PM   #9
Charlie Stephens
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Southern California
Posts: 7,305
Default Re: Claim of 25% HP bump true?

Quote:
Originally Posted by brito36 View Post
With all the conversations on increased compression, larger carburetors, and intake manifolds, I would make sure that my lower end could handle all these improvements.
I was just going to post to watch out for the top end. Be sure there is adequate clearance between the head and the piston. The original and many reproductions had a recess in the head above the piston. Many high compression heads lack this recess. If the top of your block has been machined a couple of times you could have a problem when the piston pops up above the block..

Charlie Stephens
Charlie Stephens is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2024, 08:48 PM   #10
Synchro909
Senior Member
 
Synchro909's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 8,043
Default Re: Claim of 25% HP bump true?

Quote:
Originally Posted by brito36 View Post
With all the conversations on increased compression, larger carburetors, and intake manifolds, I would make sure that my lower end could handle all these improvements.
Easy fix. Wear a diaper.
__________________
I sometimes wonder what happened to the people who asked me for directions.
Even at my age, I still like to look at a young, attractive woman but I can't really remember why.
Synchro909 is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:48 PM.