Body to frame welting...

[Steve Plucker]

Does anyone know the original part number for the Body to Frame Welting?

Thanks.

Pluck

[Marco Tahtaras]

16540
16541
16542
16543

16540-A is for 28-29 front fenders. 16540-B is longer as it extends to the front tip of the fender @ the apron. 16541 was introduced with the new running board aprons in mid '28. I think that answers all the questions that would have arose when looking them up.

[Steve Plucker]

Originally Posted by Marco Tahtaras

16540
16541
16542
16543

16540-A is for 28-29 front fenders. 16540-B is longer as it extends to the front tip of the fender @ the apron. 16541 was introduced with the new running board aprons in mid '28. I think that answers all the questions that would have arose when looking them up.

That is true...only up to, according to the Part Releases, February 1928 when the length went from 55-1/2 inches to 43-1/2 inches and remaind the same throughout production, according to the drawings.

The only difference I can see from A-16540-A and A-16540-B is when Ford specified that the the "A" be the strip with "round" holes and the "B" was the "strip" with "elongated" holes. This change was implimented on October 15, 1929 according to the Part Releases.

Pluck

[Gary Karr]

Marco, do you have details of these pieces? Also, what is the thickness?

[d.j. moordigian]

Thanks Steve,...I was a-little-lost....

Wasn't there 2 of them on each side, that overlapped, maybe on the 28's?

[Charles Reese]

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)

I don't recall my source (maybe Doc K), I show the frame webbing to be "1-3/4" wide and quite thin (3/64” to 1/16”thick)" and "extended from front edge of fender to the rear end of the running board shield".

Photo shows a sample of my original welting found under my Jan 28 side splash apron = 2” wide x 1/16” thick

[Marco Tahtaras]

Originally Posted by Charles Reese

I don't recall my source (maybe Doc K), I show the frame webbing to be "1-3/4" wide and quite thin (3/64” to 1/16”thick)" and "extended from front edge of fender to the rear end of the running board shield".

Photo shows a sample of my original welting found under my Jan 28 side splash apron = 2” wide x 1/16” thick

That is quite unusual as I've never seen original webbing wider than 1-3/4" and 1/16" sounds a bit thick but could be right.

Originally Posted by Gary Karr

Marco, do you have details of these pieces? Also, what is the thickness?

I thought you had originals. Although I posted that info years ago I can't recall specifically and it appears all my samples are still at the old house. The one thing I can say is that both the front fender to frame anti-squeak and running board apron to frame anti-squeak are the same thickness as the original floor board anti-squeak. I would bet you have samples of that.

[Charles Reese]

remeasured with better calipers .. this is the 'smushed' part (i.e., under apron/fender .... the unsmushed is thicker/covered with mud/oil

[Gary Karr]

Thanks Marco. I do have a set of 16540-A front fender webbing pieces. They are definately 1-3/4" wide and extend from the front of the frame rail to 3" beyond the front body mount bolt. I don't have the 16540-B pieces though and am wondering what they are like for the early-style running board shields since the shields don't lay on the frame rail all the way back to the rear fender.

[Marco Tahtaras]

Gary,

As I said in my post, there was no rear section until the aprons were changed in mid '28. My best guess is that when they transitioned to the later configuration they shortened the length of A-16540. And of course the "A" suffix wasn't used until the "B" version was introduced for the 1930 models.

The one thing that still confuses me is just why they chose to segment the anti-squeak at all. I've not yet found the logic in it.

[Jim Mason]

I've never thought about it. If one piece of the webbing was tacked (stuck) to the fender and the other to the apron...?? the lengths would be easily handled, they would stay where they belonged...hmmm..

[Gary Karr]

Originally Posted by Marco Tahtaras

Gary,

As I said in my post, there was no rear section until the aprons were changed in mid '28. My best guess is that when they transitioned to the later configuration they shortened the length of A-16540. And of course the "A" suffix wasn't used until the "B" version was introduced for the 1930 models.

The one thing that still confuses me is just why they chose to segment the anti-squeak at all. I've not yet found the logic in it.

This all makes sense now as I look at the allignment of the running board shields to the frame rail on E-28's. They are attached to the wood body blocks plus an aditional block that attaches to the sub frame of the body aand the shield.

[ericr]

Originally Posted by Marco Tahtaras

Gary,

As I said in my post, there was no rear section until the aprons were changed in mid '28. My best guess is that when they transitioned to the later configuration they shortened the length of A-16540. And of course the "A" suffix wasn't used until the "B" version was introduced for the 1930 models.

The one thing that still confuses me is just why they chose to segment the anti-squeak at all. I've not yet found the logic in it.

It had to have been cost since much of the anti-squeak is sitting there on the top frame rail doing nothing, but I wonder if they glued it on during assembly to keep it on.

[Steve Plucker]

Originally Posted by ericr

It had to have been cost since much of the anti-squeak is sitting there on the top frame rail doing nothing, but I wonder if they glued it on during assembly to keep it on.

The "glue" that was used was refered to was Aphaltum...This was a black, tar like substance that was heated to 185* and added to the anti-squeak strips. Not know if the strips were punched with holes first or not.

Pluck

[d.j. moordigian]

Please,....I'm not understanding which parts(welt/webbing/anti-squeak) were placed
on the cars, from start of production too when they used one piece from the front
frame horn to just past the end of the shield.

I just can't "see it", and weren't there two at one time?

Thanks, Dudley

[Marco Tahtaras]

Originally Posted by d.j. moordigian

Please,....I'm not understanding which parts(welt/webbing/anti-squeak) were placed on the cars, from start of production too when they used one piece from the front frame horn to just past the end of the shield.

I just can't "see it", and weren't there two at one time?

Thanks, Dudley

They were never one piece except early 1928 which was short. The early running board aprons did not overlap the frame rail beyond the cowl so the rest wasn't needed. When they redesigned the aprons to overlap the frame they added a second section from there back.

It's important to note for those unfamiliar that there was also a small piece on each bracket that would otherwise make contact with the bottom of the fender and/or apron.

Originally Posted by Jim Mason

I've never thought about it. If one piece of the webbing was tacked (stuck) to the fender and the other to the apron...?? the lengths would be easily handled, they would stay where they belonged...hmmm..

No, the split did not align with any seam. Also, the anti-squeak webbing was not "stuck" to the fender and apron although they usually do after decades of being on a car.

All years the front fender, running board, and running board shield were all assembled together on a padded bench. As the chassis approached the station on the assembly line where the fender and running board assembly was to be installed, the webbing was laid down on the frame rail.

[d.j. moordigian]

I get it now......

Thank you.

[Charles Reese]

Originally Posted by Marco Tahtaras

They were never one piece except early 1928 which was short. The early running board aprons did not overlap the frame rail beyond the cowl so the rest wasn't needed.

I wish I had paid more attention to detail during disassembly as I ran my material much further back. I realize the material was/is very thin, but is it possible that this was one factor that gave me fits when trying to align my doors to my cab? I now have webbing material between the frame and all of my body block rubber pads. Hate to think I need (i.e., authenticity) to remove the webbing from the cowl back.

Originally Posted by Marco Tahtaras

When they redesigned the aprons to overlap the frame they added a second section from there back.

Makes sense when presented in this context.

Originally Posted by Marco Tahtaras

It's important to note for those unfamiliar that there was also a small piece on each bracket that would otherwise make contact with the bottom of the fender and/or apron.

Did that!

Originally Posted by Marco Tahtaras

All years the front fender, running board, and running board shield were all assembled together on a padded bench. As the chassis approached the station on the assembly line where the fender and running board assembly was to be installed, the webbing was laid down on the frame rail.

As a matter of curiosity, I wonder if the fender bracket was pre installed to the fender and then bolted to the frame as part of this completed assembly.

I, for one, really enjoy hearing of the nuances of the assembly process!!

[Jim Mason]

I have the assembly procedure as documented by 'American machinist magazine' on my site. check around step 49 and the photos.

[d.j. moordigian]

Originally Posted by Charles Reese

As a matter of curiosity, I wonder if the fender bracket was pre installed to the fender and then bolted to the frame as part of this completed assembly.

I, for one, really enjoy hearing of the nuances of the assembly process!!

Charles, the fender brace was installed on the frame pryer. Look at
1997 JS page 2-11...