|
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#41 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: on the Littlefield
Posts: 6,555
|
![]()
Those “big things” are usually in the end of the bore of single master cylinders.
Most of the dual master cylinders don’t have residual pressure valves — there was a change in the wheel cylinders— instead of just a spring a tapered expander was added to the spring to put pressure on the edges of the cup to keep them in contact with the walls of the cylinder taking over the function of the residual pressure valve. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#42 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Mid-Coast Maine
Posts: 2,815
|
![]()
They're not big and yes they look like the picture, most 10psi valves are red. Note the end fitting, i.e., not big.
Look at this ebay link. https://www.ebay.com/sch/i.html?_fro...acat=0&_sop=15 Glenn |
![]() |
![]() |
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
![]() |
#43 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Mid-Coast Maine
Posts: 2,815
|
![]() Quote:
The wheel cylinder expander spring coils were not used on the early Fords. There use and exclusion of a check valve in the master cylinder has in many cases been moved to a brake line manifold, So each arrangement needs to be checked for "Where is Waldo (RCV )"? This table which I just found on HAMB is a great reference. https://www.jalopyjournal.com/forum/.../watch-confirm Glenn
__________________
Archives of historical but relevant older articles: ------------- Hover mouse over the links below and click! ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~--------------- Rumble Seat's Notes Techno-Source-for-the-1932-thru-1953-Flathead-Ford |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#44 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Mid-Coast Maine
Posts: 2,815
|
![]()
Ford part of linked table
Last edited by glennpm; 10-23-2024 at 02:39 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#45 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Yucaipa, CA
Posts: 1,360
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#46 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Lyman,ME.
Posts: 2,890
|
![]() Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
__________________
I'm thinkin' about crankin' My ragged ol' truck up and haulin' myself into town. Billy Joe Shaver…RIP |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#47 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 2,027
|
![]() Quote:
Pedal ratio isn't to bad to figure out. Long side measurement (from pad center to pivot center) divided by short side measurement (pushrod pin center to pivot center) equals the ratio. '40 pedal picture as an example; 12 divided by 1.875 = 6.4 to 1 ratio. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#48 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2023
Posts: 218
|
![]()
GlennPM Sir, 1 great BIG THANK YOU, and 1 regular sized thank you, for your time and research!!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#49 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Mid-Coast Maine
Posts: 2,815
|
![]()
You’re welcome and I’m glad to help you.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#50 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2023
Posts: 218
|
![]()
I am more confused now than ever over the required (now) use of a brake component I have never had to use, and know nothing about.
I have built 3 other vehicles that have had the MC's mounted BELOW the wheel clyinder level plane. NONE have required any residual valves, pedal ratios or some wild mechanical engineering! Mount the MC in line with the bottom of the pedal, make a rod between the two, bleed, adjust and go have fun! Those three past builds have the same brakes, ('48 car and F-1, F-100 PU) a dual port, front rear MC as this build. Why, all of a sudden I seem to be in over my head trying to get a simple brake system to work now like it has done successfully in the past? There is no way those residual valves sticking out of the MC, with 90 degree tubing bends will clear the park brake system, or the drive shaft tube. It's too late into the build to redesign the frame for the MC location. Besides, the entire frame is original holes and all. The parking brake system is all mounted, chromed, powder coated, working. Cant redesign that. The rear end is all new (except for axles) inside, and can't change it to open drive. So I seem to be now stuck between a rock and a hard place,,,,,,,, don't quite know what to do. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#51 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2023
Posts: 218
|
![]() Quote:
The bleeders "look" to be at the top of each wheel clyinders. The came from Bob Drake. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#52 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2023
Posts: 218
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#53 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Mid-Coast Maine
Posts: 2,815
|
![]() Quote:
The first thing you should do today is unscrew the brake lines from the master cylinder. Then poke gently into the center of the MC fittings. If you have RPVs, you'll feel resistance right away. If a paperclip or better, the blunt end of a drill bit slides way in, you have no RPVs. Regarding the inline RPVs, the red 10psi ones, can be installed in the closest hard lines to the MC like I have done on my '32. There is absolutely NO reason that they have to be screwed directly into the MC ports. Here is the my rear RPV circled in a blue oval. .. and here is the one for the front brakes Also note that you can have RPVs in the MC and also in the rigid brake tubing too. Make sure the flow arrows on the added RPVs are orientated toward the brakes. Glenn
__________________
Archives of historical but relevant older articles: ------------- Hover mouse over the links below and click! ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~--------------- Rumble Seat's Notes Techno-Source-for-the-1932-thru-1953-Flathead-Ford |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#54 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2023
Posts: 218
|
![]() Quote:
Very hard to see. Took someone that wasn't hard of hearing in one eye and couldn't piss out of the other eye, to look up in there to see where one of the welds wasn't completely blended in. Normal look up in there that pedal looks "factory"! Somebody did a nice job of converting that pedal. Ok, measuring with my 6" machinest scale,,,,,,,, I'm partly guessing (because i am not looking straight on) there is 3 and 3/8" from the center of the pedal pivot to the center of the pin that goes through the MC rod clevis, or that hole in the bottom of the pedal. Am I making any sense? So, if you do your "Jethro Bodine siphern", you know, ought into ought and carry five. What ratio do you come up with in corrlation with a 1" ID MC bore? What do I need, a bigger bore or smaller.? Thanks |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#55 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2023
Posts: 218
|
![]()
Hey PM Glenn! Early this afternoon, wifey brought soem "You-Tube" viedos showing "how to mount", "how to adjust", and abunch of other interisting tid-bits up on the TV
The main topic on here of where the residual valves were located, was in the MC. You come along and show pictures of these long looking valves. I am trying to picture how those long S ah B's go into the MC ports! Well, I think that they must screw into the MC ports and the brake line screws into them! All that sticking out from the MC 3" or so. See, remember, I have NO knowledge of these residual valves, and why this is all a shock to me, since swapping brakes around from the very early '70's! The one video shows those valves mounted IN LINE on the brake lines! Ah, so THAT is how they go! I understand now! (actual mental relief) They said the 2 psi valves are for disc brakes, and the 10 pounders go for drum brakes. Another one of those videos said that the smaller MC bore, the more pressure, the bigger the MC bore the more volume. Didn't know that. They used a math formula to figgure of whitch MC bore to the pedal ratio to use. All that math 'siphern is way above my 6 remaining "brane sells." I can do fractions in my head, but that is it. Another one of those videos, guy was talking about what size and what kind of tubing to use for brake lines. The one guy said that one can't use stainless steel for brake lines, because they are too hard (brittle) to bend or double flair. I bent and double flaired all of mine! A machinest showed me a little trick in the '90's to use when double flairing stainless with a regular tubing flairing tool that has the double flair dies. Oh well. Now, none of those videos showed EXACTLY where to place those residual valves in corrlation of the MC! Close as possible? Anywhere there is a long enough straight-a-way? Do both valves have to be the same distance from something? MC, wheel cly, first bend? Then I get on here a little bit ago, and see where you posted your pictures. Wish you would have posted those pictures earlier. I wouldn't have had so much of a shock attack on something i know nothing about. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#56 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2023
Posts: 218
|
![]()
GlennPM. Let me ask yoiu this. Once someone helps me figgure out my pedal ratio, then find the correct size MC bore diameter required for that ratio.
Wouldn't it be easier to get a manual drum/drum MC with that required bore diameter and already have those residual valves in the MC line ports, like in your picture there? Instead of trying to install those in-line valves ( in your pictures) in my existing lines? In the valve ebay listing you posted, there are several hundred of those valves listed! Boo-coo of those 10 pounders are listed with different part #'s. Confusing to try and figgure which ones will work for me. I think a MC with the correct bore, and the residual valves (which look like they can be removed to powder coat) would be easier and better for me? whaddyatink? Thanks |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#57 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Mid-Coast Maine
Posts: 2,815
|
![]()
Please unscrew the fitting to your MC and see what you have before doing anything else. Ten minute job, well 1/2 hour to gather a drain pan, drill bit and wrench :-)
__________________
Archives of historical but relevant older articles: ------------- Hover mouse over the links below and click! ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~--------------- Rumble Seat's Notes Techno-Source-for-the-1932-thru-1953-Flathead-Ford Last edited by glennpm; 10-26-2024 at 10:33 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#58 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 2,027
|
![]()
I would avoid the multiple Chineseum valve listings on eBay and instead get either the USA made residuals from SS Brakes or Wilwood valves from Speedway Motors. We have had good luck with both.
Have had trouble with 1/8 NPT threads in the cheapo valves a couple times; they seem off and tend to want to leak up until the point of the aluminum body cracking. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#59 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Mid-Coast Maine
Posts: 2,815
|
![]() Quote:
I have a '32 and from the center of the shaft to the pedal mounting bolt is 13" So for you: 13"/3.375 = 3.85 ratio (My ratio is 13/3 = 4.33) Almost all hydraulic converted systems for '32s will have similar ratios since the MC pushrods are below the K member.
__________________
Archives of historical but relevant older articles: ------------- Hover mouse over the links below and click! ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~--------------- Rumble Seat's Notes Techno-Source-for-the-1932-thru-1953-Flathead-Ford Last edited by glennpm; 10-26-2024 at 10:31 AM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#60 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Mid-Coast Maine
Posts: 2,815
|
![]() Quote:
For the location, the first straight run before any branch , splitting between LF, RF RR or RL brake cylinders. 10psi will then be maintained from the check valve back to the MC. Any other reference regarding just length or bends is wrong for this application. Sorry I didn't post my pictures earlier. You can see from them how they are located from the MC.
__________________
Archives of historical but relevant older articles: ------------- Hover mouse over the links below and click! ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~--------------- Rumble Seat's Notes Techno-Source-for-the-1932-thru-1953-Flathead-Ford |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|