|
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Central NY 13355
Posts: 710
|
![]()
Does anyone know the shock arm lengths, front and rear for 1935 -1939 Fords? Thank you. John
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: harpursville ny
Posts: 1,114
|
![]()
39s are 4"
|
![]() |
![]() |
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
![]() |
#3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: southeastern Michigan
Posts: 10,601
|
![]()
No period Ford shock arm is only 4" long; perhaps you are thinking of the links between the end of the arm and the axle.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: harpursville ny
Posts: 1,114
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Wisconsin, USA
Posts: 9,853
|
![]()
No, the shock links are NOT 4" on a '39. They are 3" at all four corners.
The 4" links were first placed on '40 Fords, front only and then only the vehicles equipped with the stabilizer bar.
__________________
"I can explain it for you. However, I can't understand it for you". |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 5,187
|
![]() Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Lexington, NC
Posts: 1,016
|
![]() Quote:
With respect, I disagree with your statement. 4 shock links were introduced on the 1937 Ford (NOT the 40) for the front only. The 4 link carries part number 78-18055 A1 or A2. This was carried through 1939 on the front as well, with the only possible change being an early 39 introduction of the Marsden nut for attaching a changed shorter stud on the link versus the 5/16 fine thread and a lock washer attaching hardware on the earlier longer link. This is all documented in both the 37 and 38/9 books. If you believe the Green Book, the Shock Absorber Link Chart on page 325 indicates 3 shock links (48-18055) on both the front and rear (NOT a 4) on 1940 Fords with a 4 link being used on 60hp cars. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Wisconsin, USA
Posts: 9,853
|
![]() Quote:
And perhaps the most glaring; no serious restorer uses the "green bible" for anything but a "loose" reference. The parts therein were intended for service with little to absolutely zero concern of authenticity. When I was researching for the "It's Ford for '40" book, I relied mostly on drawings and service letters. Mostly. The 4" link was placed into service as there was an interference created with the addition of the "new" sway bar in 1940. Hey Terry B. you have always had a great insight to the front chassis on these cars. What say you? In the meantime, I am going to dig deeper. I have been wrong before.
__________________
"I can explain it for you. However, I can't understand it for you". Last edited by Kube; 07-30-2023 at 05:33 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Columbus, IN
Posts: 1,592
|
![]()
The reprint of the Chassis Parts List dated June, 1937 lists the absorber links for 1937 models: 73, 74, 77 and 78 as follows (front) 78-18055 and (rear) 48-18055-A. It also shows that 1935-36 models used the 48-18055-A both front and rear.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Lexington, NC
Posts: 1,016
|
![]()
Using the Green Book is not what I use as well. Notice I said “if you believe the Green Book”….meaning you can take it or leave it.
Therefore, I would venture to say that it is author of the ‘40 book who’s research is flawed. Researching for these books is hard enough and mistakes are made. When I did the research for the ‘37 Book, I found the 78 part number shock link (which is 4”) was introduced in 1937 (actually in October ‘36). I also have torn down and looked at more ‘37 Fords than I care to remember and the long stud shock links happen to be one of the items I always looked for since service replacements used the thin Marsden nut. As a matter of fact, I can most likely get you the entire history of the part. I still have over 500 pages of research done by Gary Mallast when he proofread the ‘37 book and he was working on his ‘38/9 Book. I don’t think anyone can argue his ability to research the archives. (David Rehor, Don Rogers and him are the best, period). He would start with the introduction of the part and research it until it was obsoleted. I would also guess that Ford would not introduce a part in 1940, as suggested, and then retroactively assign a 1937 part number to it. I think Zeke hit the nail on the head (with his chassis parts book reference) Also, as the former Judging Standards Committee Chairman, I would deduct points if a ‘37 didn’t have 4” shock links on the front or have to be shown documentation that they were 3”… which I don’t think exists. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: northeast coast
Posts: 220
|
![]() Quote:
in any event, would anyone happen to have a link or picture of this from underneath? i've seen isometric drawings and top 45 degree photos, but i am not clear how the sway bar ends connect to the axle. dogbones, too? thanks sid |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2019
Posts: 58
|
![]()
I have this image from a repair web site describing the differences in the Ford shocks (so long ago, I don't remember who?).
![]() These are a set of front shocks which I believe are 35 Fords: ![]() The above description states a 35 has a body height of 2 1/2". These do too: ![]() The arms are pressed on starting in 35...much like these. The length of the arms are 6 inches, center hole to center shock: ![]() So to answer some of your Questions John, I believe a 35 front shock arm is 6 inches in length....center hole to center hole. The following image from one of the Ford Chassis Parts Books only covers up to the 34 front shock arm being 5.25 inches long center hole to center hole. ![]() Information beyond this covering up to your original 1939 year is out of my capabilities. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: South Texas
Posts: 2,042
|
![]()
Attached is the Houdaille information I have from a 1940 export catalog. I cannot verify this is 100% correct for all 28-40 Fords, but it is a starting place.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2019
Posts: 58
|
![]()
Thanks 38 Coupe for the Houdaille Repair information, very interesting! I'll admit I didn't read this original message date until posting.....July 2023!?. A little long in the tooth, but still important info just the same.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: northeast coast
Posts: 220
|
![]()
agreed. all information is new (knew?) if you have not been exposed to it.
thanks |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|