|
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2021
Posts: 101
|
![]()
Hi Folks,
I am wanting to reduce engine RPM, when cruising the highway, by increasing rear tire size on a standard 16" rim on our Mercury M47. Currently running 215/70/16 with 3 speed box and Dana 41 rear end. Any experienced suggestions? Thanks. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Solihull, England.
Posts: 9,086
|
![]()
235/85R16 Land Rover size.
|
![]() |
![]() |
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
![]() |
#3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: Southern Oregon
Posts: 783
|
![]()
I run 215 x 85 x 16's on my F350. They are 30.39" tall.
Your 215 x 70 x16, should be 27.85". The 85's should give a extra 2.5+". If your rim width will except the 235's width, you'd have a tire 31.73 tall, a extra 3.88". How wide are your rims? Edit: If you go with the 215 x 85, it will increase your speed from 60 mph, to 65 at the same rpm, the 235 x 85 would be 68 mph.
__________________
Frank '35 Ford Model 51 '48 Ford F3 '54 Ford Tudor Mainline Last edited by frnkeore; 08-31-2021 at 01:25 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Rochester, Il
Posts: 651
|
![]()
A 235/85R16” has a minimum rim width standard of 6.00”. These would be appropriate only if you have non-stock wider rims. If you have stock 4.50” rims even your current 215/70R16s are over spec. Stu
__________________
Stu McMillan Marmon-Herringtons |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2021
Posts: 101
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Encino California, near Burbank
Posts: 945
|
![]() Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Rochester, Il
Posts: 651
|
![]()
I put my name at the bottom of every posting I make, both here and on FTE. I have a reputation and try to give factual info supported by references. When correct tire sizes exist I think it wise to stay within Tire and Rim Association standards. In this person’s case I would stay with stock 6.50-16” tires.
I try to avoid the debate over bias vs radial tires on cars and small trucks. Our old riveted rims were never intended for radials, but I’ve not found an authoritative reference that documents harm due to their use. This is not the case on big truck tubeless sizes used commercially. I have an SAE study showing rim failures due to radial usage on early riveted tubeless wheels. Stu
__________________
Stu McMillan Marmon-Herringtons |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Encino California, near Burbank
Posts: 945
|
![]()
I'm not critical of anything Stu writes. I was impressed that someone other than I notices that there is a standard. There are so many ignored engineering and safety standards in the old car hobby, that it invites unwanted regulation as we got with emissions, and safety industries. Good Luck: Fred A
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2021
Posts: 101
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|