Go Back   The Ford Barn > General Discussion > Early V8 (1932-53)

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-28-2010, 08:46 PM   #1
Will Kimble
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 179
Default Pros & Cons: 3.54 vs. 4.44 & Mitchell OD

I have only put a few miles on my new AV8 but I am already concerned about the 4.44 gear ratio that came in the rearend - I don't think it is gonna work for even a short highway trip. I always figured I would switch to a 3.54 and keep things simple, but...

But the car is a hoot to drive around town with the 4.44 rearend. I am starting to think a 4.44 rear with a Mitchell overdrive would be really handy, almost like a four speed. Use 1-3 in town and pull it onto overdrive when you want to go 65.

So I am evaluating the options and looking for input on pros & cons. I don't want to go any faster than 65, but I would like to be able to run 65 from Cincinnati to Columbus, Dayton, Indianapolis or Louisville. My car is pretty light, but is a 221 with a stock cam & heads, dual 97s and headers. And a '39 transmission. I know what goes into a rear gear swap, but have never worked with a Mitchell before - although their product reputation is superb. My only concern would be getting the right size overdrive for my car, since it isn't a stock piece - a '37-40 rearend that has been shortened to fit a '32 chassis and has the short '46-48 rear radius rods.

I guess the big question is should I keep it simple (3.54) or would the extra planning and expense of the overdrive be worth it?

Here's a shot of the car for reference:



Thanks for your thoughts,
Will Kimble
www.kimblemandolins.com
Will Kimble is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2010, 12:33 AM   #2
blucar
Senior Member
 
blucar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Ventura, CA
Posts: 2,466
Default Re: Pros & Cons: 3.54 vs. 4.44 & Mitchell OD

Reviewing your picture I would say that you have a rear tire that is around 600x16. A later model differential, '33-34 would most likely not be to wide for your body, 3.54 would work very well. The overdrives, Columbia and/or Mitchell work very well.... The Columbia's look better under a street rod... If you use an overdrive, a 3.78 would work better with your tire size.
For my point of view, if you intend to drive the car on the highway at 65 mph, you had better plan on doing a lot of suspension improvements to the chassis.
__________________
Bill.... 36 5 win cpe
blucar is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
Old 11-29-2010, 02:30 AM   #3
Human Fly
Member
 
Human Fly's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 59
Default Re: Pros & Cons: 3.54 vs. 4.44 & Mitchell OD

I dont know what the price of the Mitchell, but what about a quick change. I bought a New Zealand one and its a very nice item. Not sure what price it would be in USD.
Human Fly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2010, 05:46 AM   #4
JWL
Member Emeritus
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Fitzgerald, Georgia
Posts: 2,204
Default Re: Pros & Cons: 3.54 vs. 4.44 & Mitchell OD

In my experience with Mitchell I found you can describe the dimensions of your radius rod mount and get the lengths and locations you specify. I have 3.78 & Mitchell and have considered 3.54 plus Mitchell. The 4.44 would be great if pulling a heavy trailer.
JWL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2010, 06:12 AM   #5
flatmotor40
Senior Member
 
flatmotor40's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Georgia
Posts: 635
Default Re: Pros & Cons: 3.54 vs. 4.44 & Mitchell OD

I have a Mitchell in my 40 conv and would not change a thing it works great got the 36% OD from them.Whwn you need the 4.44 you still have it and when you need to cruise push in on the cable and go in any gear.I did opped for the cable because I didn't want any hole in the floor
flatmotor40 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2010, 06:40 AM   #6
Will Kimble
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 179
Default Re: Pros & Cons: 3.54 vs. 4.44 & Mitchell OD

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
Thanks guys, getting some good input.

Blucar, sorry, that is important info - the rear tires are 7.00X16s.

And thanks JWL, that is helpful to know I could give them the measurements and get what I need.

Will
Will Kimble is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2010, 07:23 AM   #7
oldford2
Senior Member
 
oldford2's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: pittsfield, MA
Posts: 2,086
Default Re: Pros & Cons: 3.54 vs. 4.44 & Mitchell OD

Do 7:00-16 tires work on stock 6:00 -16rims? If so, what is the diameter increase? Thanks John
oldford2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2010, 08:31 AM   #8
Will Kimble
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 179
Default Re: Pros & Cons: 3.54 vs. 4.44 & Mitchell OD

I have run the 7.00s on '35 Ford wire wheels and they worked great. These wheels are from a '47 Ford. According to Coker the tires are 30.4" diameter. I will measure them as a double check and report if they are significantly different.

I see quite a few hotrodders running 7.50s on these wheels but that is beyond my comfort zone.

Will
Will Kimble is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2010, 09:10 AM   #9
BrianCT
Senior Member
 
BrianCT's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Windham, CT
Posts: 703
Default Re: Pros & Cons: 3.54 vs. 4.44 & Mitchell OD

Quote:
Originally Posted by oldford2 View Post
Do 7:00-16 tires work on stock 6:00 -16rims? If so, what is the diameter increase? Thanks John
I have looked at that and concluded you gain 2 or 3 % at best.
__________________
[FONT=Comic Sans MS]
BrianCT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2010, 01:30 PM   #10
blucar
Senior Member
 
blucar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Ventura, CA
Posts: 2,466
Default Re: Pros & Cons: 3.54 vs. 4.44 & Mitchell OD

A quick change rear end would be all right for racing and/or bragging rights, however, for daily driving use it would not be practical...
Opps, hill ahead, time to get out the tools and re-gear the diff...
__________________
Bill.... 36 5 win cpe
blucar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2010, 06:32 AM   #11
flatmotor40
Senior Member
 
flatmotor40's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Georgia
Posts: 635
Default Re: Pros & Cons: 3.54 vs. 4.44 & Mitchell OD

change the rear gear and you lose the stump puller go with OD
flatmotor40 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2010, 11:08 AM   #12
Kahuna
Senior Member
 
Kahuna's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NorCal
Posts: 2,617
Default Re: Pros & Cons: 3.54 vs. 4.44 & Mitchell OD

Will, you've got a great, well thought out car. If it were mine, I'd replace the rear axle gears with 3.78 or 4.11. Then go with either a Mitchell or Volvo type overdrive. To me, the Volvo would be best
Great car
Jim
Kahuna is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2010, 03:32 AM   #13
HotRodmicky
Senior Member
 
HotRodmicky's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Germany
Posts: 249
Default Re: Pros & Cons: 3.54 vs. 4.44 & Mitchell OD

use 3.54 r&p

Easy and simple.....no od to hook up etc.

I ran a 3.25 in my `33 Sedan with a 221ci engine.
Later i used a 255ci.
Was the perfect combo.

So 3.54 with a 221ci is fine (and 7.00x16)
HotRodmicky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2010, 06:09 AM   #14
flatmotor40
Senior Member
 
flatmotor40's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Georgia
Posts: 635
Default Re: Pros & Cons: 3.54 vs. 4.44 & Mitchell OD

with OD when you hit freeway and you push OD on engine RPM goes like a new car saves wear and tear on flathead
flatmotor40 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2010, 12:27 PM   #15
Tim
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Aptos, CA
Posts: 334
Default Re: Pros & Cons: 3.54 vs. 4.44 & Mitchell OD

I can only speak from my current situation. 3:54 gears, 7:50-16's and a 28 tooth V8 gearbox all powered by the tough little Banger A motor. I can cruise comfortably all day long at 65-68. The 28 tooth V8 box is the key though as you still have a low 1st. Do the 3:54 and save lots of $. A '36 rear is only 1" overall wider and makes the tires just right in the Rear.


Tim
Tim is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2010, 09:32 AM   #16
38 coupe
Senior Member
 
38 coupe's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: South Texas
Posts: 2,042
Default Re: Pros & Cons: 3.54 vs. 4.44 & Mitchell OD

A 4.44 axle with the 36% overdrive gives you a final drive of 2.84. The same 4.44 axle with 26% overdrive will get you a final drive of 3.29. For hot rod use I think if you are enjoying the 4.44 around town, don't mess that up. Put a Mitchel in and go.
38 coupe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2010, 11:54 AM   #17
Will Kimble
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 179
Default Re: Pros & Cons: 3.54 vs. 4.44 & Mitchell OD

Thanks for the input everybody, I really appreciate it. The Mitchell is tempting and makes a lot of sense, but I think for the sake of simplicity I will proceed with the 3.54. I had it in my last car (Model A roadster pickup with B engine) and was satisfied, I expect I will like it even better with the V8.

Best wishes for the holidays,
Will Kimble
Will Kimble is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:46 AM.