|
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Eastern Iowa
Posts: 354
|
![]()
I have a great running rebuilt 144 c.i. motor and was wondering if a 3 speed trans. from a 60's vintage mustang or Ford will interchange and work behind my 144? Any fitment issues? such as input shaft length, splines,bolt pattern, etc.?Anyone ever do this?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Howell, Michigan, USA, The Peoples Slightly Overspent Demodependancy of Michigan
Posts: 637
|
![]()
Join the TFFN ( The Ford Falcon Network ). I've been on it for some other Falcon projects and that subject has come up.
|
![]() |
![]() |
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
![]() |
#3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Midland Park, NJ
Posts: 4,290
|
![]() Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
Since the 144 is the same casting as the 170 and 200, the 3.03 trans should fit. I don't know if the light duty trans had the same bellhousing as the 200 though ( transmission bolt pattern wise). You may have to use the 200 bellhousing. I don't know if this was the same in 63 and 65. Logic tells me it is so, but Ford sometimes did not seem to use logic at times. The 3.03 trans was used in lot of cars in the 60's. I don't have any info on input shaft length or splines. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|