Go Back   The Ford Barn > General Discussion > Model A (1928-31)

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-10-2011, 12:23 AM   #1
mrtexas
Senior Member
 
mrtexas's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Sugar Land, TX
Posts: 4,395
Default Head studs vs head bolts comments LBrumfield?

Pete's Machine Shop in Albuquerque, NM built my new engine using a diamond block. He installs grade 8 head bolts rather than studs. He told me that good strong studs are available but strong nuts aren't. For a high compression head he says torque the bolts to 70#. I got my studs from Brumfield when I bought the high compression head. He was out of nuts so I got them at a swap meet from a Model A vendor.

Head bolts or studs? I'm sure there will be some lively discussion on this one.


Last edited by mrtexas; 02-10-2011 at 06:53 PM.
mrtexas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2011, 08:12 AM   #2
Kevin in NJ
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: South East NJ
Posts: 3,398
Default Re: Head studs vs head bolts

Let me take a stab a this one. The following is really my best guess.

The course threads in the cast iron are great for putting a stud in with no tension and holding a static stud. The cast iron threads are not good at allowing a moving under tension for proper torque. I also think that the cast iron would wear too much after a bunch of uses.

The cast iron is a course metal and is not good at fine threads. The course pitch threads will give you more tension per degrees of rotation. So the torque values you use for nuts may be completely wrong for generating the correct tension needed to hold the head down. I also believe the friction in each hole may vary more due to the course structure of the cast iron leading varying tension on each bolt.

I would also throw in that some the cast threads have issues from use over the years. I would be afraid that during torquing into cast iron with a bolt you would strip a marginal thread.

That is my intuitional guess as to why bolts should be frowned upon.

I have a hard time believing that hard enough nuts are not available. Something does not sound right from a couple of angles in Pete's logic. It seems that Brumfeld and others have been using studs successfully on some fairly high compression applications for quite some time. People like Larry probably have engineered the correct solution so they have checked the real numbers.

Lets hear from someone that has a proper answer.
Kevin in NJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
Old 02-10-2011, 08:29 AM   #3
George Miller
Senior Member
 
George Miller's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NC
Posts: 2,975
Default Re: Head studs vs head bolts

Quote:
Originally Posted by mrtexas View Post
Pete's Machine Shop in Albuquerque, NM built my new engine using a diamond block. He installs grade 8 head bolts rather than studs. He told me that good strong studs are available but strong nuts aren't. For a high compression head he says torque the bolts to 70#. I got my studs from Brumfield when I bought the high compression head. He was out of nuts so I got them at a swap meet from a Model A vendor.

Head bolts or studs? I'm sure there will be some lively discussion on this one.

Studs are going to be stronger. I think you will find they use studs in racing engines, they also use them for the mains. As far as the nuts not as strong that is not true. You have to by grade 8 or better, not the import butter bolts.
George Miller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2011, 10:29 AM   #4
1931 flamingo
Senior Member
 
1931 flamingo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: new britain,ct 06052
Posts: 9,393
Default Re: Head studs vs head bolts

I believe Larry has commented on this in the past AND says studs. Try a search on this topic as it has been covered extensively in the past. It has to do with coarse studs in the block and also being 80 yrs old. JMO
Paul in CT
1931 flamingo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2011, 12:54 PM   #5
MrTube
Senior Member
 
MrTube's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,471
Default Re: Head studs vs head bolts

I remember the previous thread and the out come being stick with studs.

I have to assume Ford used studs for a reason, and it certainly wasn't because they took longer to install.
MrTube is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2011, 01:05 PM   #6
ABento
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: San Luis Obispo
Posts: 237
Default Re: Head studs vs head bolts

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
Studs hold and clamp better than bolts and there are hard washers and nuts from the stud manufactures ERA, I believe the name is the one I use, common problem when doing just a head gasket, is not cleaning everything correctly, remove each stud run a tap in the block and a die on the stud and nuts to clean all the threads now you can clean the top of the block, when putting the studs back in use a high heat teflon, in the squeeze tube, to seal the studs in the block and a drop of oil on each nut to torque.
ABento is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2011, 01:13 PM   #7
MrTube
Senior Member
 
MrTube's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,471
Default Re: Head studs vs head bolts

Whats the best way to tighten studs into the block?
MrTube is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2011, 01:19 PM   #8
Doug in NJ
Senior Member
 
Doug in NJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Princeton, NJ
Posts: 965
Default Re: Head studs vs head bolts

Quote:
Originally Posted by MrTube View Post
Whats the best way to tighten studs into the block?
With your fingers!

Doug
__________________
My '31 S/W sedan project:http://31ford.dougbraun.com
My restoration diary: http://dougbraun.com/blog
Doug in NJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2011, 01:31 PM   #9
MrTube
Senior Member
 
MrTube's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,471
Default Re: Head studs vs head bolts

Quote:
Originally Posted by Doug in NJ View Post
With your fingers!

Doug

I really need to stop over complicating things
MrTube is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2011, 04:04 PM   #10
mrtexas
Senior Member
 
mrtexas's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Sugar Land, TX
Posts: 4,395
Default Re: Head studs vs head bolts

Quote:
Originally Posted by 1931 flamingo View Post
I believe Larry has commented on this in the past AND says studs. Try a search on this topic as it has been covered extensively in the past. It has to do with coarse studs in the block and also being 80 yrs old. JMO
Paul in CT
Someone have a lilnk to the above?
mrtexas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2011, 04:19 PM   #11
bobH
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: so cal, placerville, vegas
Posts: 1,396
Default Re: Head studs vs head bolts

Comments from a guy that knows 'nothing'... First, I've been reading here for a long time that the 'usual' reason for bolts, is for ease of disassembly... nothing else.
Secondly, studs are generally thought to give a stronger, more predictable 'clamping force', if that has any importance (as for 'race' engines).
Thirdly, I'm having trouble understanding the '70-lb-ft'... MUCH lower values have been posted by the experts. What's the compression of this engine?
Forthly, aren't 'decent' nuts available from places like MMC (McMaster-Carr)?
Lastly, some of the experts have opined that (quality) grade 5 is plenty adequate. Again, what is the compression of this engine?
JMHO
bobH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2011, 04:26 PM   #12
George Miller
Senior Member
 
George Miller's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NC
Posts: 2,975
Default Re: Head studs vs head bolts

Quote:
Originally Posted by bobH View Post
Comments from a guy that knows 'nothing'... First, I've been reading here for a long time that the 'usual' reason for bolts, is for ease of disassembly... nothing else.
Secondly, studs are generally thought to give a stronger, more predictable 'clamping force', if that has any importance (as for 'race' engines).
Thirdly, I'm having trouble understanding the '70-lb-ft'... MUCH lower values have been posted by the experts. What's the compression of this engine?
Forthly, aren't 'decent' nuts available from places like MMC (McMaster-Carr)?
Lastly, some of the experts have opined that (quality) grade 5 is plenty adequate. Again, what is the compression of this engine?
JMHO

Probably 70 ft lb because course threads would take more torque to get the same clamping force as a fine thread like on a stud.
George Miller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2011, 06:53 PM   #13
mrtexas
Senior Member
 
mrtexas's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Sugar Land, TX
Posts: 4,395
Default Re: Head studs vs head bolts

Quote:
Originally Posted by bobH View Post
Comments from a guy that knows 'nothing'... First, I've been reading here for a long time that the 'usual' reason for bolts, is for ease of disassembly... nothing else.
Secondly, studs are generally thought to give a stronger, more predictable 'clamping force', if that has any importance (as for 'race' engines).
Thirdly, I'm having trouble understanding the '70-lb-ft'... MUCH lower values have been posted by the experts. What's the compression of this engine?
Forthly, aren't 'decent' nuts available from places like MMC (McMaster-Carr)?
Lastly, some of the experts have opined that (quality) grade 5 is plenty adequate. Again, what is the compression of this engine?
JMHO
Brumfield 6:1 head

I'm not trying to generate conflict, I want all opinions.
mrtexas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2011, 07:47 PM   #14
mrtexas
Senior Member
 
mrtexas's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Sugar Land, TX
Posts: 4,395
Default Re: Head studs vs head bolts comments LBrumfield?

ttt
mrtexas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2011, 10:18 PM   #15
Chris in WNC
Senior Member
 
Chris in WNC's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Spruce Pine, NC
Posts: 1,461
Default Re: Head studs vs head bolts comments LBrumfield?

"He told me that good strong studs are available but strong nuts aren't."

last year when replacing a head gasket & a loose helicoil in our recently purchased Town Sedan I had 3, count em 3, allegedly grade 8 nuts strip out when torquing to 65 foot-pounds.

replaced them with used grade 8's I had on hand and 4000 miles later they are still hanging on.
Chris in WNC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2011, 11:09 AM   #16
Bruce Lancaster
Member Emeritus
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Madison, NJ
Posts: 5,230
Default Re: Head studs vs head bolts comments LBrumfield?

One thing to keep in mind about SAE hardware is that there is no sort of enforcement of standards out there...if someone wants to mark his grade-Z parts and boxes Grade 8, all he needs is to put the marks on. Those who supply low end retailers* have doubtless figured out that it is good to put plenty of lines on bolt heads. There is even counterfeiting of high grade aerospace hardware that is supposed to be traceable through every step of manufacture and heat treating...
Read Carroll Smiths classic book on hardware for car people... some of it is terrifying, all is informative.
If you have Grade 8 nuts stripping out, you need a different supplier, not a higher grade! Somebody sold you out to the lowest bidder!
There is much stronger stuff than SAE hardware out there, but of course none of it is going to look right on and old car.

*I recently saw a sign in the hardware aisle of Home Depot stating that their graded bolts were now connected to traceable standards...this is probably a good development, and probably a result of something labeled "Grade 8" breaking and doing something nasty to someone with a lawyer.
Bruce Lancaster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2011, 11:36 AM   #17
tmiller6
Senior Member
 
tmiller6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Livonia, MI
Posts: 197
Default Re: Head studs vs head bolts comments LBrumfield?

There is enforcement on SAE standards. The United States fastener quality act of 1999 placed controls on the marketing and marking of fasteners. This is the reason that carriage bolt heads are no longer smooth unless you find some old stock. The manufacturer has to place his mark along with the grading. All fasteners and containers have to be accurately marked with grades and country of origin. A decade ago, people were killed or injured because of counterfeiting. If you find something marked Grade 8, that isn't Grade 8, you can go after the manufacturer.
tmiller6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2011, 12:29 PM   #18
just plain bill
Senior Member
 
just plain bill's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 397
Default Re: Head studs vs head bolts comments LBrumfield?

Quote:
Originally Posted by tmiller6 View Post
There is enforcement on SAE standards. The United States fastener quality act of 1999 placed controls on the marketing and marking of fasteners. This is the reason that carriage bolt heads are no longer smooth unless you find some old stock. The manufacturer has to place his mark along with the grading. All fasteners and containers have to be accurately marked with grades and country of origin. A decade ago, people were killed or injured because of counterfeiting. If you find something marked Grade 8, that isn't Grade 8, you can go after the manufacturer.
What if the manufacturer is from China or some where else. ISO and SAE are just symbols to some manufacturers offshore. My son works for a large manufacturer that buys threaded parts from offshore manufacturers. When they receive a shipment of special bolts they have to experiment with different speeds and feeds to finish machine them as the composition of the metal varies from shipment to shipment.
just plain bill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2011, 05:49 AM   #19
brum1
Senior Member
 
brum1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Raynham, Mass.
Posts: 583
Default Re: Head studs vs head bolts comments LBrumfield?

The use of studs is a method to aid the manufacturing process. It helps to hold the gasket in place and align the head during assembly,
__________________
"no one knows more than everyone"
brum1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2011, 08:30 AM   #20
Mike V. Florida
Senior Member
 
Mike V. Florida's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: South Florida
Posts: 14,054
Send a message via AIM to Mike V. Florida
Default Re: Head studs vs head bolts

Quote:
Originally Posted by bobH View Post
Comments from a guy that knows 'nothing'... First, I've been reading here for a long time that the 'usual' reason for bolts, is for ease of disassembly... nothing else.
Secondly, studs are generally thought to give a stronger, more predictable 'clamping force', if that has any importance (as for 'race' engines).
Thirdly, I'm having trouble understanding the '70-lb-ft'... MUCH lower values have been posted by the experts. What's the compression of this engine?
Forthly, aren't 'decent' nuts available from places like MMC (McMaster-Carr)?
Lastly, some of the experts have opined that (quality) grade 5 is plenty adequate. Again, what is the compression of this engine?
JMHO
The original post stated;

"For a high compression head he says torque the bolts to 70#."
__________________
What's right about America is that although we have a mess of problems, we have great capacity - intellect and resources - to do some thing about them. - Henry Ford II
Mike V. Florida is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:16 PM.