|
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 650
|
![]()
The first time I removed my manifolds, two of the studs spun out of the block because the nuts were corroded tight. I put them back that way, but now I have a new set of studs and nuts and was wondering if there is a good way to prevent it. Will anti-sieze compound work, or will it just burn off?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
BANNED
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Wa.
Posts: 5,423
|
![]()
Neverseeze or Ledplate work pretty good.
|
![]() |
![]() |
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
![]() |
#3 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Central FL
Posts: 15
|
![]()
I've used copper anti-sieze (not the normal silver stuff) with some success. Had to look for it, but found it at NAPA.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Anchorage, Alaska
Posts: 9,192
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 948
|
![]()
use female manifolds...fwiw,jm
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: So Minn
Posts: 1,580
|
![]() Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
It has worked well for me on exhaust manifold bolts. And not expensive. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Southern Maine
Posts: 162
|
![]()
Just a word of caution. If you use anti sieze you will have to adjust the torque because of the lubricant. A general Industrial standard is to reduce the torque value by about 20% for Anti sieze because it eliminates the running torque normally included in the torque value when studs are torqued dry. Tim
http://www.imperialsupplies.com/pdf/...rqueCharts.pdf |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Anchorage, Alaska
Posts: 9,192
|
![]()
From other threads here, the consensus was just to snug them up, not torque to any particular value.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Lewisburg,PA
Posts: 938
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 650
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Princeton, NJ
Posts: 966
|
![]()
They make the copper stuff in stick form, sort of like a oversize tube of chap-stick. It's much less messy than the kind in the jar with a brush in the lid.
Doug
__________________
My '31 S/W sedan project:http://31ford.dougbraun.com My restoration diary: http://dougbraun.com/blog |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Newburgh, NY
Posts: 222
|
![]()
Sparky, not to make it any more complicated than it needs to be, but be aware that studs should have 2 different class of fits; the fine threads (where the nut goes) is a Class 2 fit or what we normally deal with when using nuts and bolts. But the coarse threads (the end that goes into the base) should be a Class 5 fit or an interference fit. It's the Class 5 fit that holds the stud in the base and allows the nut to be removed with the stud remaining firm. Of course, after 80+ years of use, often the nuts tend to rust or otherwise bind to the fine threads and the stud comes out instead. The studs that I have purchased from the Model A supply houses have not had the Class 5 fit on the coarse end and freely screw into the base. Studs should have to be "driven" usually using double nuts on the fine end. It's advisable then to use some sort of thread locking material on the coarse end of the studs if they can be easily screwed into the bolck. $0.02.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 650
|
![]()
Thanks for the tip, I do have some loctite.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Meridian, ID
Posts: 583
|
![]()
So would you recommend a small amount of blue loctite on the course threads? And maybe anti-seez on the fine threads?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Newburgh, NY
Posts: 222
|
![]()
Montana, yes. With non-interference fit coarse threads, and assuming you would chase the block threads with a standard tap, it's probably the best you could do given the situation. There might be others on this site with machining experience that could advise otherwise. I think the only viable alternative would be to clean the original studs (if they're not too corroded) but not run a die over the coarse threads - just a wire wheel.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Central FL
Posts: 15
|
![]()
Lots of cool tips here about the torque values, stick form of copper anti-seize, and now the proper fit of studs. Hadn't thought of any of it, but glad to have been informed. Let me try to add one more: use a rethreading tap or thread chaser on existing threads to help prevent cutting too much material. I have a Snap On set of the rethreading variety that's great, and not as expensive as most Snap On tools.
Rethreading: http://buy1.snapon.com/catalog/tools...e=snapon-store Thread Chasing (pricey): http://buy1.snapon.com/catalog/tools...e=snapon-store I agree the wire brush on external/male threads is best if sufficient. Edit: just found this is covered quite well here: https://www.fordbarn.com/forum/showthread.php?t=60697 Last edited by Tin Lizard; 01-31-2012 at 06:22 PM. Reason: added link to similiar discussion |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NW Ohio
Posts: 556
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|