|
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#1 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2025
Location: Western Washington
Posts: 7
|
![]()
We inherited a 1940 Ford Deluxe recently and overall it's in great condition. One thing we noticed on our second drive was that the outside face of the left rear tire is rubbing at the rear lower corner of the wheel well.
It looks like from my father-in-laws notes, that he put new rims and tires on it recently (235/65/R17). I'm sure they are bigger and wider than stock, but what's odd is that on the right side rear fender there's plenty of room for the tire. There are no wheel spacers or anything. It's the stock rear end, brakes, and springs. I looked and I don't see any evidence that one fender was bent/damaged and repaired. When I start measuring from the edge of the fender to various spots on the rear end and frame, I'm definitely seeing numbers that show the fender is a bit closer (narrower, more curved?). It also looks like the rear end isn't quite centered to the frame (it might be shifted a bit to the left). The differences I'm seeing are in the range of 3/8" - 3/4" between left and right sides. A couple of questions: Is that type of variation (1/2") normal just because of the manufacturing techniques of the day or is that something I should dig into more? The car seems to drive fine. I feel like I can solve the rub issue a few ways (and yes, I know smaller tires is one, but since one side isn't rubbing, that's not my first pick). Should I lift the body a bit? Can I do that just with spring adjustments? Should I shim out the fender brace a bit with some washers? Should I try to shift the whole body/suspension so that it's more centered? Lots of questions I know, and thank you in advance. Ian |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Hancock, New Hampshire
Posts: 393
|
![]()
It’s unlikely but the transverse spring might not be centered. The bolt that holds the spring together has a square head that fits into a square hole in the center of the rear cross member. It’s not too much of a job to undo the 4 nuts that hold the spring up into the cross member and check that the square is in the hole. Those of us who have pulled transmissions know the procedure pretty well but jack up the axle, put jack stands on the frame and lower the axle just enough to check that side to side alignment.
|
![]() |
![]() |
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
![]() |
#3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Southern France
Posts: 5,837
|
![]()
IMO It's the fender ,damaged and not repaired properly.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Mid-Coast Maine
Posts: 2,815
|
![]()
This is pretty easy to check. Put your finger on the top center of the crossmember. If you feel that the crossmember and the spring bolt head are close to flush, the rear-end is centered correctly. If the square headed spring bolt is not in the square crossmember hole, your fingertip will feel a depression. A small inspection mirror would help too.
__________________
Archives of historical but relevant older articles: ------------- Hover mouse over the links below and click! ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~--------------- Rumble Seat's Notes Techno-Source-for-the-1932-thru-1953-Flathead-Ford Last edited by glennpm; 07-14-2025 at 05:38 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 1,538
|
![]()
One issue not of a concern to the restorer crowd (stock suspension/stock wheel and tires) but can rear its ugly head to the rodder crowd (bigger tires and lowered suspension) is that the Ford fender wheel opening was staggered 3/8" front to back 1938-1948. Just an idiosyncrasy of Ford's manufacture.
On our 1938-40 fenders (fiberglass of course) we cheated the wheel opening 3/16 on each fender to compensate. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Napa,California
Posts: 6,566
|
![]() Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Lake worth Florida
Posts: 1,376
|
![]()
Also check rear spring shackles and bushings .
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2025
Location: Western Washington
Posts: 7
|
![]()
Thanks everyone! That's a good list of things for me to take a look at over the next couple of days.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2025
Location: Western Washington
Posts: 7
|
![]()
I was wondering about the shackles and bushings. What would I be looking for in terms of good/bad? I assume I don't want to have any slop in them, but should I also be looking at the shackle angle? It wasn't clear to me if the shackle angle impacts the body height, or if it's more of an indicator of leaf spring health (which might also impact the body height).
Thanks! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Lake worth Florida
Posts: 1,376
|
![]()
Looking at the shackles, the shaft should be centered in the spring and axle mount . Both should be at the same incline , though weight distribution on the car and spring conditions would alter the angle
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2025
Location: Western Washington
Posts: 7
|
![]()
Looking at the spring and shackles everything seems OK, or at least seems symmetrical.
The center bolt holding the spring is seated correctly, but the nut isn't tight, so I'll snug that up. The shackles are at even angles, but if someone wants to let me know if it's a 'good' angle that would be awesome. I think I could shim the fender brace and gain maybe 1/2", but I'm not comfortable doing any more than that and I don't think that's probably going to yield enough clearance for highway driving, so probably not useful. Unless someone says my springs and shocks are abysmal, I think I've probably come up with "tires are too wide" as the root cause. Many thanks everyone! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 10,158
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Lake worth Florida
Posts: 1,376
|
![]()
In the first picture it looks like a bar is attached by the fuel pump , if so is it an aftermarket track / panhard bar ? Again if it is it could be adjusted incorrectly.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Southern France
Posts: 5,837
|
![]()
Looks like a fuel line to me. How about a pic of the fender in relation to the tire? Several views.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Napa,California
Posts: 6,566
|
![]()
From my perspective the shackles look like they are longer than stock, but they appear to be in good shape. The wider tires and possibly wheel offset are the problem.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Mayville WI
Posts: 62
|
![]()
nothing to do with the tire clearance issue but that angle of those shocks is making them almost totally ineffective.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Mid-Coast Maine
Posts: 2,815
|
![]()
Another problem you need to fix is the awful leaned over angle of your shock absorbers.
If the shocks were vertical, they would be most effective, allowing the shocks to actually stroke and damp out road irregularities. On the other hand if the shock was laid over horizontally, they wouldn't work at all. The angle of your shocks will stroke the shocks very little and not do their job. Good sketch from the HAMB
__________________
Archives of historical but relevant older articles: ------------- Hover mouse over the links below and click! ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~--------------- Rumble Seat's Notes Techno-Source-for-the-1932-thru-1953-Flathead-Ford Last edited by glennpm; 07-14-2025 at 11:35 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2025
Location: Western Washington
Posts: 7
|
![]()
Day 2 (?) Report:
Someone had asked about something near the fuel filter that was maybe a suspension piece. It's not, it's either fuel line or fuel gauge wire. I checked up and around that area and there are no suspension parts like you were describing. Regarding the shocks, I'm glad a couple of you mentioned that. When I got under there I did think they were fairly horizontal. I can see a spot where I could bolt them more vertical, but I'll need to get the exhaust re-routed. While I can turn a wrench or wire a relay, I'm not a cutter/welder! I do think that's a project to do down the line, though, so thank you for calling it out. There was also a request for pictures of the fender and tire. Take a look at those on this post. For reference there's also one picture of the right rear tire's fender gap. Thanks everyone! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Star, MS
Posts: 4,120
|
![]()
That is a lot of tire where a 6.00x16 is supposed to go. It would be interesting to see the gap between the back side of the tire and the body. Sometimes people who modify a car spend a lot of money for aesthetics over function.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 10,158
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|