|
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Central Wisc
Posts: 50
|
![]()
Here's a question - how much of a difference is there between truck frame ( '47 pick-up) and a car frame ( '39 ) ? I'm thinking of building a '47 pick-up and I have a very good '39 frame available for which I'd install a pick-up body on . What are your thoughts ?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 7,285
|
![]()
It can certainly be done, but if your thought is to save money because you have that frame, consider the conversions of drive train and suspension.
__________________
Alan |
![]() |
![]() |
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
![]() |
#3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 1,538
|
![]()
1. 1947: 114" wb vs 1935-40 (41PU&SD) 112".
2. 1947: 3" wider track width vs 1935-40. 3. Parallel leaf springs on 1947 vs transverse 1935-40. 4. "ladder" frame on 1947 vs shaped frame with x member on 1935-40. Using the 1939 frame, mounting the pickup body, and converting to 1940-41 front sheetmetal (or fiberglass... hint, hint) and grill is very reasonable (the 47 bed will need to be narrowed 3"). Trying to use the 47 sheetmetal on a 39 frame will be a nightmare, as would trying to use the 40-41 sheetmetal on a 1947 frame. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Solihull, England.
Posts: 9,088
|
![]()
More or less what Karl said. The 39 frame would be a good candidate as a replacement for a 40/41 pickup but not for the 42-47.
Mart. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Southern California
Posts: 7,305
|
![]() Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
Quote:
Charlie Stephens |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|