|
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Wisconsin, USA
Posts: 9,852
|
![]()
Thought some of you may enjoy seeing the Mercury engine I have ready to install in my 1940 Ford convertible. This is the factory installed engine, complete right down to the high compression cylinder heads.
Only 111 1940 Ford convertibles were built like this.
__________________
"I can explain it for you. However, I can't understand it for you". |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Gardiner Me.
Posts: 4,200
|
![]()
Are those aluminum heads? Is the cam different than a regular 40merc? Walt
|
![]() |
![]() |
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
![]() |
#3 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Wisconsin, USA
Posts: 9,852
|
![]() Quote:
The cam, etc. is identical to all 1940 Mercury engines. These heads were an additional "option" above and beyond the Mercury (engine) equipped Ford.
__________________
"I can explain it for you. However, I can't understand it for you". |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: now Kuna, Idaho
Posts: 3,818
|
![]()
Any idea of the compression ratio-or how many cc's the combustion chambers are?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Wellington, OH
Posts: 55
|
![]()
Hey Kube,
I thought you might like to see an Ohio Highway Patrol Ford. It is on display at the State Patrol Academy in Columbus, Ohio |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: North Pole, Alaska
Posts: 1,470
|
![]() Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Cloverdale California
Posts: 148
|
![]()
So the wind can blow in your hair and maybe a little sun while your at it!😎
__________________
"DON'T CRUSH IT....RESTORE IT" |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Wisconsin, USA
Posts: 9,852
|
![]() Quote:
Only then was this request approved or denied. There were a total of 4182 Fords (various models) built in this way during the 1940 model run. Why a convertible? I suspect this was possibly an abuse of position. In other words, the vehicle was approved under official request but perhaps intended for personal use. Of course that is merely my theory. A couple of "side notes" might be relevant here. One: NO 1939 Fords were built in this manner. In fact, the practice was strictly prohibited. Two: In 1941 this practice became "official" and as such 1941 Fords equipped with the Mercury engine were not nearly as rare as the 1940 models. I have owned a 1940 Deluxe coupe built in this manner and know of only one other coupe, currently quite a "basket case" built as such. My convertible was "rescued" out of New York after MANY years of negotiations. Read: begging, pleading, bribing, etc ![]() There were no other modifications performed upon these specially built vehicles. It was pretty much a factory "engine swap".
__________________
"I can explain it for you. However, I can't understand it for you". |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Powell, TN
Posts: 2,617
|
![]()
Those heads are really interesting. I cannot find mention in the SB or in the Ford/Merc or Ford(green book) parts book. The 59 series cast iron heads were the highest comp ratio given for v8s according to the SB. There is no doubt that HC heads would have made a good difference in the engines.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Senior Member
|
![]()
Mike I would love to sit in your classroom to know a little of what you have done. Some are dreamers
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Wisconsin, USA
Posts: 9,852
|
![]() Quote:
These particular heads have a 7.1:1 ratio, quite a bit higher than the stock Mercury cylinder heads.
__________________
"I can explain it for you. However, I can't understand it for you". |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Gloucester VA
Posts: 1,042
|
![]()
I've seen dubious iron 81AS heads that are stamped in the face of the head and now your 99AS heads that are stamped on the upper edge. Are you sure of what you have? Why would Ford not be proud enough of their product to cast a number into your heads?
Lonnie |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Member Emeritus
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Madison, NJ
Posts: 5,230
|
![]()
The call out is that the numbers are CAST, not stamped. My 81AS (there are variants with more defined number on face) heads have only "AS" on the front to distinguish them from the normal "A" cast 81A's, and full number cast on upper edge. These "Denver" heads were iron, in three variants...
They were discontinued BEFORE the cumulations...they are listed in some superseded bulletins and prewar parts lists only. Like many discontinued parts, they were never cataloged after the war. I think the S marks then as parts counter only, not assembly line. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Wisconsin, USA
Posts: 9,852
|
![]() Quote:
I have only seen one other 99AS head, corroded so bad as to be worthless, that was cast as mine are. I think the "S" signifies "special". Perhaps I'll someday soon have the opportunity to research these at the Benson Ford Research Center. By the way, one letter of two that came with this car clearly requests "high compression cylinder heads" to be installed at the factory. Unfortunately it does not spell out exactly what that meant but simply states "high compression cylinder heads".
__________________
"I can explain it for you. However, I can't understand it for you". Last edited by Kube; 04-28-2015 at 08:00 AM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
Junior Member
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 14
|
![]()
Where do you get your number of 111?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Harrisburg, PA
Posts: 915
|
![]()
Kube, Do you happen to have any photos of the combustion chambers of these heads?
I have 2 pairs of the 81 "S" heads and just wondered how it compared to them. Now I'll have to start hunting in the aluminum piles too I guess for some of these!
__________________
-WANTED-
CYLINDER HEADS 77-6050B, 81AS - 81SB - 99AS - 99SB - 19AS |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Wisconsin, USA
Posts: 9,852
|
![]()
Benson Ford Research Center. I actually have the break down of exactly how many 1940 Fords were built by month, model, engine, assembly plant, etc.
__________________
"I can explain it for you. However, I can't understand it for you". |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Wisconsin, USA
Posts: 9,852
|
![]() Quote:
I am guessing the biggest difference between the Ford 81S heads and the Mercury 99AS heads would be the size of the chambers.
__________________
"I can explain it for you. However, I can't understand it for you". |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
Member Emeritus
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Madison, NJ
Posts: 5,230
|
![]()
Yes, 81AS are the smallest chamber ones. The only 99AS heads listed in the bulletins are iron...so this is something unusual here!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 7,285
|
![]()
Mike, I know of engine/transmission assembly serial number records by the day, but the trail ends there. Does your research follow those serial numbers farther?
__________________
Alan |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|