Go Back   The Ford Barn > General Discussion > Model A (1928-31)

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-21-2013, 01:33 AM   #1
Roadster62
Senior Member
 
Roadster62's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Ridgefield, Ct
Posts: 3,449
Default How the 28-29 Briggs & Murray Fordor COWLS Differ

My pile of '29 60C parts didn't sell at Hershey, so today I started on the cowl save. First off this isn't going to be a 100% perfect restoration, a some day driver I hope. The cowl is a Murray, and a far better design than a Briggs IMO, it is all steel with a lot of factory pinch welds. The A posts and windsheild area is fine but the tin is shot, and I don't like the look of the cowl band. Found a near perfect Briggs tin section (Gray Primer)at the Cider Mill Meet this spring and plan to mate the two. The photos show the differances. The under windsheild area is going to need the most work. Plan is to cut across post to post just ahead of the broken off captive screw holes. If you know what the missing piece looks like please let me know. Don't know if you can see the pinch welds, but they will stay, then the Briggs cowl will be cut to fit, pinch welded and the seam butt welded. The once nailed to wood sides will be spot welded to the posts. Should get the cut made during the week, then the structure is off to the sandblaster. Bob
__________________
They don't have to run to be enjoyed. I'm here to enjoy the hobby, and enjoy the cars no matter what they look like. Most of the worlds problems are electrical.

Last edited by Roadster62; 10-21-2013 at 02:26 AM.
Roadster62 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2013, 01:34 AM   #2
Mike V. Florida
Senior Member
 
Mike V. Florida's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Florida between Sarasota and TampaSouth Florida
Posts: 14,054
Send a message via AIM to Mike V. Florida
Default Re: How the 28-29 Briggs & Murray Fotrdor COWLS Differ

Photos?
__________________
What's right about America is that although we have a mess of problems, we have great capacity - intellect and resources - to do some thing about them. - Henry Ford II
Mike V. Florida is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
Old 10-21-2013, 01:36 AM   #3
Roadster62
Senior Member
 
Roadster62's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Ridgefield, Ct
Posts: 3,449
Default Re: How the 28-29 Briggs & Murray Fotrdor COWLS Differ

The photos:
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 1932 CHASSIS FUND 087.jpg (25.8 KB, 54 views)
File Type: jpg 1932 CHASSIS FUND 083.jpg (31.0 KB, 50 views)
File Type: jpg 1932 CHASSIS FUND 084.jpg (23.2 KB, 48 views)
File Type: jpg 1932 CHASSIS FUND 088.jpg (55.0 KB, 46 views)
File Type: jpg 1932 CHASSIS FUND 089.jpg (41.8 KB, 46 views)
File Type: jpg 1932 CHASSIS FUND 082.jpg (41.4 KB, 44 views)
File Type: jpg 1932 CHASSIS FUND 085.jpg (41.9 KB, 46 views)
__________________
They don't have to run to be enjoyed. I'm here to enjoy the hobby, and enjoy the cars no matter what they look like. Most of the worlds problems are electrical.
Roadster62 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2013, 09:59 AM   #4
Marco Tahtaras
Senior Member
 
Marco Tahtaras's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 3,099
Default Re: How the 28-29 Briggs & Murray Fordor COWLS Differ

My guess is that the grey primered cowl is from a 60-A, B leather back which had more wood. The other Briggs bodies had a cowl almost identical to the Murray.
__________________
http://www.abarnyard.com/
Marco Tahtaras is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2013, 02:26 PM   #5
Dick Carne
Senior Member
 
Dick Carne's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Fayetteville, Georgia
Posts: 472
Default Re: How the 28-29 Briggs & Murray Fordor COWLS Differ

I'm with Marco on this one. I've had an early Brigg's leather-back fordor cowl (the running gear is now under our mail truck), and it is quite different indeed from the post-leather back cowl sections. I seem to recall that there was a good bit more wood, perhaps even across the top of the cowl section on the earlier models, than the later cowl sections. With the introduction of the "three window" styles in both the Briggs and the Murray line, there is no real ascertainable difference that I can determine - in fact I used a Murray town sedan cowl section on my Briggs standard fordor to mate up into a Briggs town sedan. All of the cowl and body components mated up fine. Hope this helps.
Dick Carne is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2013, 09:29 PM   #6
Roadster62
Senior Member
 
Roadster62's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Ridgefield, Ct
Posts: 3,449
Default Re: How the 28-29 Briggs & Murray Fordor COWLS Differ

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
Two nights in a row on the 60C, highly unusual for me. Bought a 3 foot length of 3/4 strap at the hardware store this morning along with a 1/16 inch thin cut off disk. Made my cut, used a screw driver to pry off the ends and I now have a free cowl frame.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 1932 CHASSIS FUND 095.jpg (51.2 KB, 11 views)
File Type: jpg 1932 CHASSIS FUND 096.jpg (55.9 KB, 11 views)
File Type: jpg 1932 CHASSIS FUND 098.jpg (40.3 KB, 12 views)
File Type: jpg 1932 CHASSIS FUND 099.jpg (52.5 KB, 11 views)
File Type: jpg 1932 CHASSIS FUND 101.jpg (30.2 KB, 11 views)
File Type: jpg 1932 CHASSIS FUND 104.jpg (36.7 KB, 11 views)
File Type: jpg 1932 CHASSIS FUND 105.jpg (16.0 KB, 11 views)
File Type: jpg 1932 CHASSIS FUND 106.jpg (21.6 KB, 8 views)
__________________
They don't have to run to be enjoyed. I'm here to enjoy the hobby, and enjoy the cars no matter what they look like. Most of the worlds problems are electrical.
Roadster62 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:10 PM.